Supporters of Ohio’s Issue 1 are aware of the cruelty of abortion, but remain indifferent.
The Fight for Life in Ohio
In 1862, a soldier of the 20th New York State Militia, posted to the shore of the Rappahannock, marveled at the crowds of black slaves making their way away from their plantations to Union lines and freedom. In a letter home, he mused, “Is not the negro a man? Warmed with the same sun, hurt with the same weapons, having the same feelings, affections, aspirations that the white man has? Why then should he be a slave to his fellow man?”
I’ll tell you why, Alexander Stephens, vice president of the Confederacy, declared a year earlier. There is, he said, this “great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition.”
For decades and before, the pro-life movement in Ohio — as in the rest of the county — has asked, like the soldier on the Rappahannock, Is not the child in the womb a human being? Does she not have a heart? Can he not feel pain? Does not her humanity move toward a future?
Ohio has long been the protector of the unborn. In 1834, the Ohio General Assembly passed a law banning abortion, save to “preserve the life” of the woman. In 1913, the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed that protection. After Roe v. Wade destroyed the protections of the unborn in all 50 states, Ohio and many of its municipalities attempted to pass limited protective legislation.
But following the shock of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, the pro-life movement set to work to rectify the harm wrought by that fractured decision. Among the states, Ohio has been in the lead in the passage of legislation affirming the humanity of the unborn.
In 1995, just three years after Casey, Ohio was the first state to pass a ban on partial-birth abortion, later repassed when such a restriction was constitutionally approved. A “heartbeat” bill was first brought before the Ohio General Assembly in 2011, and, although defeated at the time, spurred other states to enact “heartbeat” bills. Along with other states, Ohio passed its own such bill in 2019 (which is now enjoined awaiting appeal and decision by the Ohio Supreme Court). Now 15 states have similar “heartbeat” bills.
Other protections dot the Ohio Revised Code. Abortions may not be performed after viability (set at 22 weeks of gestation) or, in another law, after 20 weeks (when the unborn child can feel pain). Ohio also has a fetal homicide act (effective from the time of conception) and a Born Alive Act (currently enjoined) that would protect a child born alive after a failed abortion. Babies with Down syndrome cannot be aborted for that reason.
Women seeking abortion must be provided with information about the status of their unborn child. The Woman’s Right to Know Act requires women to be given information not only of their developing baby (with pictures), but also of the help that is available to them (including free pregnancy centers), and the legal requirement of the father to provide child support. There is a 24-hour waiting period, and if the procedure involves an ultrasound, the woman must be given the opportunity to view the results. There is also a parental consent requirement for minors seeking an abortion and a requirement that a physician be present when an abortifacient drug is administered (currently enjoined for other reasons).
Nothing in these laws makes any sense unless that entity in the womb is a human person — in fact, a child.
The proponents of Issue 1 have an answer: They don’t care. They don’t care if the fetus is a human person. The child’s subordination to the will of its mother is, as Alexander Stephens would have put it, “his natural and normal condition.”
James Madison, on the floor of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, recoiled from the proposition that the Constitution should formally recognize slavery. There should be “no property in man,” he declared. But for the proponents of Issue 1, the child is “part” of a woman’s body, her property.
Abraham Lincoln saw the moral truth as well. As slavery demeans the humanity of the slave, it corrupts the humanity of the slaveholder: “As I would not be a slave, so would I not be a master.”
For those of us living in Ohio, Issue 1, if cemented into the fundamental law of our state, would not only sweep away the humanity of the unborn child — it would sweep away ours as well.
What efforts have been made in Ohio to expand access to abortion and undermine existing protections for the unborn?
T requires physicians to provide women with information about the risks and alternatives to abortion, as well as information about fetal development. In addition, minors seeking an abortion must obtain parental consent, unless they are granted judicial bypass. These laws are all aimed at protecting the unborn and ensuring that women are fully informed before making a decision about abortion.
Despite these protections, the fight for life in Ohio is far from over. The pro-life movement continues to face challenges and opposition from those who advocate for unrestricted access to abortion. In recent years, there have been attempts to pass laws that would expand access to abortion and undermine the existing protections for the unborn. However, the pro-life movement in Ohio remains resilient and committed to protecting the sanctity of life.
One of the key battlegrounds in the fight for life in Ohio is the issue of taxpayer funding for abortion. Ohio has a longstanding policy that prohibits the use of state funds for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. However, there have been efforts to repeal this policy and use taxpayer dollars to fund abortions. The pro-life movement in Ohio has been steadfast in opposing any attempts to use public funds for abortion and has successfully prevented the expansion of taxpayer-funded abortion in the state.
The pro-life movement in Ohio is also focused on supporting women facing unplanned pregnancies and providing them with alternatives to abortion. There are numerous pregnancy resource centers and organizations across the state that offer counseling, financial assistance, and other support services to women in need. These organizations work tirelessly to empower women and provide them with the resources they need to choose life for their unborn children.
In addition, the pro-life movement in Ohio is working to educate the public about the humanity of the unborn and the devastating impact of abortion. Through grassroots efforts, community outreach programs, and educational initiatives, pro-life advocates are raising awareness about the value and dignity of every human life. They are challenging the prevailing narrative that treats abortion as a simple medical procedure and highlighting the complex ethical and moral questions surrounding the issue.
The fight for life in Ohio is not just a political or legal battle. It is a struggle for the hearts and minds of the people and a fight to uphold the principles of justice and equality. The pro-life movement in Ohio is driven by a deep belief in the inherent worth and dignity of every human being, from conception to natural death. Through their tireless efforts, they are working to build a culture of life in Ohio and create a society that respects and protects the sanctity of every human life.
As the soldier on the Rappahannock recognized more than a century ago, the question of whether the unborn child is a human being is a fundamental moral and philosophical question. In Ohio, the pro-life movement is answering that question with a resounding “yes” and fighting to ensure that every child in the womb is given the chance to live and thrive. The fight for life in Ohio is a fight for justice, compassion, and the future of our society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...