Prosecutors Targeting Trump Get Slammed by Judge, Apologize to Her After Tense Exchange – ‘I Don’t Appreciate Your Tone’
The summary discusses a court hearing in which U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon criticized a prosecutor from special counsel Jack Smith’s team, during proceedings related to former President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents. This session revolved around the Department of Justice’s request for a gag order to limit Trump’s public communications. During the hearing, Judge Cannon insisted on maintaining courtroom decorum and emphasized the need for a clear link between Trump’s statements and any incitement of violence, as per the legal requirements for imposing a gag order.
The debate included Trump’s defense attorney, Todd Blanche, arguing that the former president’s statements were political speech critiquizing President Biden and the Justice Department, and thus protected by the First Amendment. The prosecution, on the other hand, claimed that Trump’s statements were out of bounds for First Amendment protection. Additionally, defense attorney Emil Bove argued against the funding mechanism for the special counsel’s office, suggesting it was unconstitutional due to the lack of a budgetary cap, posing concerns over control and oversight.
The passage ends with a promotional message from The Western Journal, urging readers to support their journalism, emphasizing the importance of the upcoming 2024 election and claiming that mainstream and tech companies are limiting their advertising reach due to their editorial stance.
By Jack Davis June 25, 2024 at 4:58am
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon laid into a prosecutor with special counsel Jack Smith’s team on Monday during a hearing in which the Department of Justice wanted to put limits on former President Donald Trump’s speech.
Cannon is overseeing Trump’s trial in federal court in Florida on allegations he mishandled classified documents. Prosecutors are demanding she impose a gag order on Trump, according to Fox News.
Cannon lashed out at prosecutor David Harbach, saying at one point he was being snippy.
“I don’t appreciate your tone,” Cannon told Harbach, according to CNN.
She told him she would “appreciate decorum at all times.”
“If you aren’t able to do that, I’m sure one of your colleagues can take up arguing this motion,” she said.
CNN did not report what Harbach said that drew Cannon’s fire, but did report that the attorney later apologized to the judge.
During the hearing, Cannon said that the prosecution needed to specifically connect statements Trump made with any incitement to violence.
The law under which a gag order is being sought “still requires a finding” that there is a risk associated with a defendant’s speech, she said, according to CNN.
Is Trump being persecuted?
“There still needs to be a factual connection between A and B,” Cannon said.
During the hearing, Trump defense attorney Todd Blanche said Trump made no threats against FBI agents.
“The attacks, very clearly, are against President Biden,” Blanche said of Trump’s communications at issue.
“Of course, President Trump has absolutely no desire for anything bad to happen to law enforcement,” Blanche said, referring to a Trump post on his Truth Social platform that declared that the Justice Department “AUTHORIZED THE FBI TO USE DEADLY (LETHAL) FORCE. NOW WE KNOW FOR SURE, THAT JOE BIDEN IS A SERIOUS THREAT TO DEMOCRACY,” according to The Washington Post.
“It is a critique of President Biden and his Justice Department and it is completely fair and protected political speech,” he said.
Harbach, however, claimed Trump’s comments are “way out of bounds” and “nothing like speech that should be protected by the First Amendment,” according to CNN.
Blanche said prosecutors are too vague in their allegations, suggesting they want to punish Trump for comments made by others.
“Steve Bannon making a comment is potentially the kind of thing that could send President Trump to jail,” Blanche said.
Also ]during the hearing, defense attorney Emil Bove argued Monday that the special counsel’s office was funded by an unconstitutional “permanent indefinite appropriation” not covered by the budget process, according to ABC.
“Is there any cap to the funding?” Cannon asked.
“No, and I think that is part of the reason … to be very wary of who can access it and why,” Bove said. “There is no check on the scope of what’s going on here.”
An Important Message from Our Staff:
In just a few months, the world is going to change forever. The 2024 election is the single most important election of our lifetime.
We here at The Western Journal are committed to covering it in a way the establishment media simply will not: We will tell the truth, and they will lie.
But Big Tech and the elites don’t want the truth out. That’s why they have cut us off from 90% of advertisers. Imagine if someone cut your monthly income by 90%. That’s what they’ve done to people like us.
As a staff, we are asking you to join us to fight this once-in-a-lifetime fight. Without you not only will The Western Journal fail, but America will fail also. As Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”
Will you support The Western Journal today and become a member?
A Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.
This is the time. America will live or die based on what happens this year. Please join us to get the real truth out and to fight the elites, Big Tech, and the people who want America to fail. Together, we really can save the country.
Thank you for your support!
P.S. Please stand with us!
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...