“Today marked the beginning of the US v Google trial.”
US Accuses Google of Breaking the Law in Battle for Internet Dominance
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States argued on Tuesday that Alphabet Inc’s Google broke the law in its efforts to dominate online search, as a trial seen as a battle for the soul of the internet got underway before a packed court in Washington.
Quotations from Top Lawyers:
-
KENNETH DINTZER, deputy branch director at the U.S. Justice Department:
- “This case is about the future of the internet.”
- “If Google sets the rules, it will always be to their advantage.”
- “Google manipulates auctions for ads placed on the internet” to raise ad prices.
- Regarding Google communications about revenue sharing deals with companies like Apple: “They knew these agreements crossed antitrust lines.”
-
JOHN SCHMIDTLEIN, lead lawyer for Google:
- Defending Google’s 90% market share in search: “The large majority of Windows PC users search on Google, not (Microsoft’s) Bing.”
- Regarding the market place for search engines: “Users today have more search options and more ways to access information online than ever before.”
- Discussing Apple’s and Mozilla’s competitions to pick best search engines: “Google won these competitions on the merits.”
- Describing how easy it is to replace Google with a different search engine: “A few easy clicks.”
(Reporting by Diane Bartz; Editing by Richard Chang)
In the first segment of an exclusive interview for weekly briefing, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan says he believes that most Americans think there is a ‘double standard’ of justice at the Biden DOJ.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has officially declared an invasion at the southern border because of the Biden Administrations polices.
New details emerge surrounding the death of a baby after he was exposed to Fentanyl at a Bronx daycare center.
The Biden Administration is under scrutiny over its role in colluding with social media companies to censor free speech online.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States argued on Tuesday that Alphabet Inc’s Google broke the law in its efforts to dominate online…
By Mathieu Rosemain and Silvia Aloisi PARIS (Reuters) – Apple said on Wednesday its iPhone 12 model was certified by multiple international…
By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate’s top Democrat is bringing U.S. technology leaders including Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Meta…
By John Revill ZURICH (Reuters) – ABB is spending $280 million on a new robotics factory in Sweden, the Swiss engineering and…
rnrn
What are the specific allegations made by the US Justice Department against Google in the battle for internet dominance?
US Accuses Google of Breaking the Law in Battle for Internet Dominance
In a high-stakes legal battle that could shape the future of the internet, the United States has accused tech giant Google of breaking the law in its quest for online dominance. The trial, taking place in Washington, has drawn significant attention as it highlights the immense power and influence of one of the world’s leading tech companies.
The case, brought forth by the US Justice Department, centers around Google’s alleged manipulation of online search results and its control over the digital advertising market. The government argues that Google’s actions have harmed competition and have ultimately hindered innovation and consumer choice.
Kenneth Dintzer, the deputy branch director at the U.S. Justice Department, emphasized the significance of the case, stating, “This case is about the future of the internet.” He highlighted Google’s ability to set the rules in the online space, giving them an unfair advantage over competitors.
Dintzer further accused Google of manipulating ad auctions to increase prices, disadvantaging advertisers and ultimately hurting consumers. He also pointed to Google’s revenue-sharing agreements with companies like Apple, suggesting that Google was well aware that these agreements crossed antitrust boundaries.
John Schmidtlein, the lead lawyer representing Google, defended the company’s dominant position in the search market, citing the overwhelming preference of Windows PC users for Google over Microsoft’s Bing. He argued that Google’s market share reflects the competitive landscape and the choices made by users.
Moreover, Schmidtlein highlighted the wide range of search options available to users today, suggesting that competition in the search engine market is robust. He pointed to competitions held by companies like Apple and Mozilla to select the best search engine, stating that Google emerged victorious based on its merits.
The outcome of this trial will have far-reaching implications not only for Google but for the entire tech industry and the future of the internet. If the court rules against Google, it could lead to significant changes in the way the company operates, potentially opening up opportunities for smaller competitors and fostering a more competitive environment online.
The trial also underscores the increasing scrutiny of big tech companies by governments worldwide. As concerns over antitrust issues, data privacy, and the concentration of power grow, regulators continue to grapple with how best to ensure fair competition and protect consumers in the digital age.
As the trial unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom in Washington. The verdict will undoubtedly shape the trajectory of the internet and have far-reaching implications for the tech industry’s giants. Ultimately, the battle between the United States and Google represents a crucial moment in the ongoing struggle to balance innovation, competition, and consumer welfare in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...