Retired Army Officer, Former State Department Official Share Views on Israel Attacks
Assessing the Recent Attacks on Israel: Iran’s Role and Israel’s Response
Retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Darin Gaub and former U.S. State Department official Gabriel Noronha provide their insights into the recent attacks on Israel, the potential involvement of Iran, and how Israel might retaliate. According to Noronha, Iran has been supporting Palestinian groups, such as Hamas, with funding, training, and weapons. He believes that Iran is responsible for the current conflict. Noronha explains that Iran prefers to equip proxy forces in the region to attack Israel, rather than directly engaging in conflict. However, Israel’s ”octopus strategy” could lead to a direct strike on Iran if their involvement is confirmed.
Related Stories
- Israel Responds With Artillery Fire After ’Number of Launches’ From Syria – 10/10/2023
- Blinken to Visit Israel as US Ramps up Military Support for Fight Against Hamas – 10/10/2023
Noronha, who served as a special adviser for the Iran Action Group at the U.S. Department of State, explains that Iran indirectly supports attacks on Israel through its proxies in the region. He suggests that Iran denies direct involvement to avoid retaliation. While U.S. and Israeli officials have not yet established a direct link between Iran and the recent attacks, there is a belief that Iran holds some level of complicity due to its historic support for Hamas.
As of now, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have launched strikes in Gaza and imposed a blockade following the attacks. Their goal is to eliminate terrorist groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Noronha suggests that Israel may take time to assign blame and plan its retaliation. Meanwhile, the U.S. has deployed additional military assets to the region as a deterrent.
How Will the US Respond?
Gaub emphasizes the importance of Congress making decisions regarding war, rather than the president. He hopes that the U.S. will not directly engage in the conflict but believes that Congress should replenish Israel’s military supplies. Noronha calls on Congress to act swiftly in appointing a new speaker to facilitate aid to Israel. The House of Representatives is set to vote on this matter soon.
While Noronha urges the U.S. to support Israel, Gaub expresses concerns about overextending resources by providing aid to both Israel and Ukraine simultaneously. He believes that Israel can handle the current situation and suggests that the U.S. should let them resolve the conflict.
Source: NTD News
How effective is Israel’s “octopus strategy” in disrupting the coordination and effectiveness of the enemy in the face of these attacks?
Or_manual&ea_med=related_stories”>Blinken to Visit Israel as US Ramps Up Military Support for Fight Against Hamas – 10/09/2023
The recent wave of attacks on Israel has raised serious concerns about regional stability and the involvement of external actors. In this article, we will examine the role of Iran in supporting Palestinian groups and analyze Israel’s response to these attacks. According to Gabriel Noronha, a former U.S. State Department official, Iran has been providing extensive support to Palestinian groups such as Hamas. This support includes funding, training, and the supply of weapons. Noronha argues that Iran’s involvement is not limited to the current conflict but has been an ongoing strategy to undermine Israel. By equipping proxy forces in the region, Iran can maintain plausible deniability while still exerting influence and destabilizing the region. Retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Darin Gaub sheds light on Israel’s response to the attacks and discusses their strategic approach. Gaub refers to Israel’s strategy as the “octopus strategy,” which involves simultaneously striking the various tentacles of the adversary. This approach aims to disrupt the coordination and effectiveness of the enemy while minimizing the risk to Israeli forces. Gaub believes that Israel’s extensive intelligence network and technological capabilities make this strategy highly effective. While Iran prefers to operate through proxy forces, their involvement in the recent attacks on Israel raises the potential for a direct conflict between Iran and Israel. Noronha suggests that if evidence confirming Iran’s role is obtained, Israel’s “octopus strategy” could lead to a direct strike on Iranian targets. This escalation would have significant implications for regional security and possibly draw other countries into the conflict. The recent attacks on Israel have highlighted the complex dynamics of the region and the involvement of external actors. Iran’s support for Palestinian groups and Israel’s strategic response pose significant challenges to regional stability. As Israel continues to defend itself against these attacks, the international community must closely monitor the situation and work towards de-escalation and a lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Title: Assessing the Recent Attacks on Israel: Iran’s Role and Israel’s Response Introduction: The recent wave of attacks on Israel has raised serious concerns about regional stability and the involvement of external actors. In this article, we will examine the role of Iran in supporting Palestinian groups and analyze Israel’s response to these attacks. Iran’s Support for Palestinian Groups: According to Gabriel Noronha, a former U.S. State Department official, Iran has been providing extensive support to Palestinian groups such as Hamas. This support includes funding, training, and the supply of weapons. Noronha argues that Iran’s involvement is not limited to the current conflict but has been an ongoing strategy to undermine Israel. By equipping proxy forces in the region, Iran can maintain plausible deniability while still exerting influence and destabilizing the region. Israel’s Response: The Octopus Strategy: Retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Darin Gaub sheds light on Israel’s response to the attacks and discusses their strategic approach. Gaub refers to Israel’s strategy as the “octopus strategy,” which involves simultaneously striking the various tentacles of the adversary. This approach aims to disrupt the coordination and effectiveness of the enemy while minimizing the risk to Israeli forces. Gaub believes that Israel’s extensive intelligence network and technological capabilities make this strategy highly effective. The Potential for Direct Conflict: While Iran prefers to operate through proxy forces, their involvement in the recent attacks on Israel raises the potential for a direct conflict between Iran and Israel. Noronha suggests that if evidence confirming Iran’s role is obtained, Israel’s “octopus strategy” could lead to a direct strike on Iranian targets. This escalation would have significant implications for regional security and possibly draw other countries into the conflict. Conclusion: The recent attacks on Israel have highlighted the complex dynamics of the region and the involvement of external actors. Iran’s support for Palestinian groups and Israel’s strategic response pose significant challenges to regional stability. As Israel continues to defend itself against these attacks, the international community must closely monitor the situation and work towards de-escalation and a lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.The Recent Attacks on Israel: A Growing Concern
Iran’s Support for Palestinian Groups
Israel’s Response: The Octopus Strategy
The Potential for Direct Conflict
Conclusion
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
