RFK Jr.’s speech triumphs despite Dems’ attempt to silence him.
In a Paradoxical House Session, Democrats Attempt to Censor RFK Jr.’s Speech
In a paradoxical House session on Thursday, House Democrats made a desperate attempt to censor Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s speech at a meeting addressing censorship and targeting concerns. The session, which resembled an episode of “The Twilight Zone,” was intended to discuss the weaponization of the federal government.
Despite running for president against Joe Biden, Kennedy was invited by Republicans to testify at the House Judiciary Subcommittee. However, during the hearing, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz moved to take the hearing into executive session, citing Kennedy’s alleged “antisemitic and anti-Asian comments.”
House Democrats voted to censor RFK Jr during a hearing on censorship at which he was invited to speak pic.twitter.com/tsw8ETMydL
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) July 20, 2023
In addition to attempting to censor Kennedy, Democrats also tried to limit his speaking time, questioning why he should be given 10 minutes when witnesses usually receive five minutes.
Rep. @Jim_Jordan Just Publicly Humiliated Stacey Plaskett’s Hostility Towards RFK Jr.
PLASKETT: “Excuse me, point of order. I know that witnesses usually have five minutes. I see 10 minutes on the board. Is it going to be 10 minutes?”
JORDAN: “Five minutes, but we’re pretty… pic.twitter.com/jBnXbyFuqI
— The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) July 20, 2023
Despite their efforts, Schultz’s attempt to halt the hearing and transition to an executive session was defeated by the Republican majority within the committee. During the vote, several Democrats opposed the GOP’s rejection of Schultz’s motion, uttering phrases like “no to hate speech.”
In his remarks, Kennedy criticized the Democrats’ attempts to censor his speech and his run for the White House. He also highlighted the censorship he faced on YouTube, where his speech announcing his candidacy was cut off after five minutes, even though it did not discuss vaccines.
Kennedy waved a letter signed by 102 fellow Democrats, calling it an attempt to “censor a censorship hearing.” He emphasized that censorship goes against the principles of democracy and cited historical figures such as his father, his uncle, FDR, Harry Truman, and Thomas Jefferson who would find it appalling.
Kennedy argued that a new word, “malinformation,” was invented to censor people like him because there was no misinformation on his platform. He defined “malinformation” as information that is true but inconvenient to the government.
Do you agree with RFK Jr.’s message of unity?
Kennedy’s organization, Children’s Health Defense, has filed a lawsuit against various news organizations, including The Associated Press, for alleged antitrust violations related to their actions to identify COVID-19 misinformation. Kennedy defended himself against accusations of racism and anti-Semitism, highlighting his pro-Israel record and his opposition to the Biden administration’s payout to Iran.
His appearance at the hearing reflects the ongoing debates surrounding free speech and censorship in the realm of social media and online information dissemination. Despite facing criticism and attempts to silence him, Kennedy’s speech received roaring applause in the House, resonating with many Americans who long for a return to civility and the upholding of the First Amendment.
RFK Jr.’s testimony on censorship was met by applause in the chamber.
MORE: https://t.co/FLGYoZ3Xhh #MorningInAmerica pic.twitter.com/QicrtMoZzr
— NewsNation (@NewsNation) July 20, 2023
In these trying times, Kennedy’s speech serves as a call to stop the madness and find common ground. It is no wonder that Democrats were so determined to silence him. Regardless of political affiliation, his impassioned plea for unity and the preservation of the Constitution resonates with many Americans.
The post RFK Jr.’s Speech Gets Roaring Applause After Dems Attempt to Stop Him From Testifying appeared first on The Western Journal.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...