Hillary Clinton, a Russia hoaxer, should face charges for election conspiracy instead of being invited to support Trump on TV.

Hillary Clinton Should Face Criminal Charges for Election Conspiracy

Hillary Clinton, the woman who⁢ still⁣ denies the results of the ‌2016 election and whose campaign is responsible for the treasonous Russia-collusion hoax, should be facing ‌her own criminal election “conspiracy” charges. Instead, she is cheering on the indictment against former President Donald Trump and his⁤ lawyers and advisers for challenging the 2020 election in Fulton County, Georgia.

On “The Rachel Maddow Show” ⁢Monday, Clinton expressed “great profound sadness” over the latest ⁤Trump indictment, claiming that he‌ set out to⁤ defraud the United States and its citizens. She described it⁣ as a terrible moment for our country to have a former president accused of such important crimes. However, she believes that justice is being pursued and that the‍ efforts​ to undermine democracy are being brought into the​ light.

Clinton’s Hypocrisy and Involvement ​in Election Interference

Ironically, it was Hillary Clinton who actually threatened the republic by using illegal‌ tactics to try to thwart the ⁣2016 election.⁣ Her campaign paid for the infamous Steele dossier, which was used ⁤to smear Trump as a Russian stooge. Despite her involvement​ in⁢ a years-long plot to ⁣take down her opponent,‍ Clinton faced minimal consequences for her lies and illegal activities.

Furthermore, Clinton has continuously denied the ​results of the 2016 election and has not retracted her unfounded claims that the Russians were responsible for Trump’s victory. Her hypocrisy is evident ⁢as she now cheers on the latest indictment against‍ Trump,⁣ which​ is seen as ‌a transparent attempt to punish him for legally challenging the 2020 election results⁣ in Georgia.

As noted by The Federalist’s John Davidson, the indictment criminalizes mundane activities and First Amendment-protected activity. Trump is potentially facing⁤ a ⁤lifetime in prison for simply objecting to election results, while Clinton​ has ⁢faced zero consequences for her interference in the 2016 election and her mishandling of classified information.

The⁣ Media’s Role in Enabling Clinton and Interfering in Elections

Equally appalling is the ⁢media’s enabling of Clinton’s actions and their interference in American presidential elections. ⁤Rachel Maddow and others within the corporate media ‌have protected Clinton, promoted ‌the Russia-collusion hoax, and played a role in undermining the integrity of our democratic process.

Evita Duffy-Alfonso is a staff writer for The Federalist and co-founder of the Chicago Thinker.⁢ She is passionate about the Midwest, lumberjack sports, writing, and‍ her family. Follow her on ‍Twitter at @evitaduffy_1 or contact her at [email protected].