Same economists who said Biden would ease inflation say Trump will make it worse – Washington Examiner
A group of 16 Nobel Prize-winning economists issued a caution about the potential economic repercussions if Donald Trump were to be re-elected. They asserted that Trump’s economic strategies would be significantly inferior to President Joe Biden’s and could reignite inflation, which according to them has reduced substantially. Criticism towards Trump’s economic policies comes in light of some economists previously asserting that Biden’s policies—specifically citing the ’Build Back Better’ plan later named the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)—would curb inflation despite apparent increases under his administration.
The letter mentioned that the BIL, with a new expenditure of about half a trillion dollars, was expected to ease future inflationary pressures even though inflation rates were about 5% at the time of endorsement. This expectation came despite early cautions around the American Rescue Plan (ARP), also endorsed by economist Joseph Stiglitz, which predicted minimal risks of inflation at a time when inflation was merely 1.7%. However, post the signing of ARP and later BIL, inflation surged, eventually necessitating aggressive monetary tightening by the Federal Reserve to begin reversing inflationary trends.
In sum, these Nobel laureates, many of whom had previously supported Biden’s economic policies that seemed to exacerbate inflation initially, warned that Trump’s return might revert improvements made in controlling inflation, posing a fragile outlook for Biden’s economic framework.
A group of 16 Nobel Prize-winning economists authored an open letter warning that if Donald Trump won a second presidential term, his economic agenda would not just be “vastly” inferior to that of President Joe Biden’s but that Trump would also “reignite” the inflation “which has come down remarkably fast.” Of course, a criticism of Trump’s heterodox economic proposals would mean a little more from a team of economists that did not previously lie that Biden’s empirically abysmal policies would bring down inflation instead of supercharging price instability to its worst crisis in 40 years.
You see, 14 of the 16 economists from the 2024 letter wrote another letter in September 2021 cheering on Biden’s “Build Back Better” agenda, which would later become the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Spearheaded by Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia, George Akerlof of Georgetown, Sir Angus Deaton of Princeton, Sir Oliver Hart of Harvard, Eric Maskin of Harvard, Daniel McFadden of Berkley, Paul Milgrom of Stanford, Roger Myerson of the University of Chicago, Edmund Phelps of Columbia, Paul Romer of NYU, William Sharpe of Stanford, Robert Shiller of Yale, Christopher Sims of Princeton, and Robert Solow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology claimed that the BIL, which infused about half a trillion dollars of new spending into the economy, would “ease longer-term inflationary pressures” despite inflation already running at 5%. Again, this September 2021 letter would be less embarrassing if Stiglitz hadn’t already endorsed the preliminary portion of the BBB agenda, the American Rescue Plan.
Rewind back to February 2021, when inflation was just 1.7%, Stiglitz called a refusal to pass the “urgently needed” $1.9 trillion ARP “irresponsible and reckless.”
“Opponents of the Biden plan also disingenuously warn against inflation — that lurking bogeyman that is more fantasy than real threat nowadays,” Stiglitz wrote in support of the ARP. “Indeed, some data suggest that wages may be falling in parts of the economy. But if inflation does emerge, the US has ample monetary and fiscal tools at the ready.”
Of course, after Stiglitz got his wish when Biden signed the ARP into law, the “fantasy” of inflation jumped from below the Federal Reserve’s maximum target of 2% to 5% when Stiglitz and 15 other Nobel laureates pushed Biden to pass the next phase of BBB. Within the year after the BIL was signed into law, inflation almost doubled to the near double digits. Only after the Fed enacted its fastest monetary tightening in four decades did inflation begin to slow.
Even so, the Fed’s unilateral war on inflation, which is not just being unassisted by the Biden administration but actively undermined, has slowed to a crawl. In the past year, the annual inflation rate has barely slipped from 4% to 3.3%, or a progress rate of 1.5% per month. And recall that as a result of Bidenomics and big spending, real average wages are down 5% since Biden took office, a laughable and predictable result of the bills Stiglitz said would spur wage growth.
Economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco explicitly blamed “fiscal support measures” such as the ARP and BIL for increasing inflation about three percentage points higher than it would be by the end of 2021, while economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago upgraded the estimate even higher, to about four points.
The same economists who backed BBB from the start and doubled down even when the inflation it wrought became evident are now tripling down. After lying that Biden is responsible for “lowering long-term inflationary pressures,” the Nobel signatories of the 2024 letter claim that Trump is worse than the alternative because he would worsen inflation.
“Donald Trump and the vagaries of his actions and policies threaten this stability and the U.S.’s standing in the world,” the signatories write. “We believe that a second Trump term would have a negative impact on the U.S.’s economic standing in the world and a destabilizing effect on the U.S.’s domestic economy.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
The letter does not even cite specific Trump policies, just his “fiscally irresponsible budgets” that historically had a deficit of a full trillion fewer than Biden’s today.
Voters can find honest reasons to justify not voting for one guy or another, but a letter claiming Trump will stoke inflation while Biden is responsible for taming it just is not one of them.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
