Idaho can enforce near-total abortion ban in ERs, SCOTUS rules
OAN’s Brooke Mallory
5:25 PM – Friday, January 5, 2024
On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected a Biden administration attempt to guarantee easier access to abortion in hospitals in red states by allowing Idaho to continue enforcing its restriction on the operation in emergency rooms.
Just over a year after Roe v. Wade was overturned, the court decided to hear arguments in the case this spring, bringing a second significant abortion issue before the justices.
According to Idaho law, a doctor cannot perform an abortion procedure unless they can prove that the mother’s life is in danger.
The Biden administration asserted that emergency departments are required by separate federal legislation to offer “stabilizing care,” which includes abortions, in a wider range of situations, such as when a patient’s health is in “serious jeopardy.”
A significant claim in the case was made when the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade last year. Even after that, there are still a lot of unresolved legal issues over the process that are currently pending in federal courts.
A conservative appeal against the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) long-standing clearance of the abortion drug mifepristone has already been accepted by the Supreme Court.
The federal legislation at issue in this case mandates that hospitals receiving government funds, such as those provided by Medicare, give patients stabilization treatments even if they are unable to pay for it. The goal was to “guarantee that all patients would receive basic medical treatment” in hospitals.
Following the Roe v. Wade ruling by the Supreme Court, the Biden administration declared that federal law mandates hospitals to give expectant patients the same treatment, including the option to have an abortion if required, even in states where the procedure is prohibited.
Idaho officials say that the Medicare law is being interpreted as a “federal super-statute on the issue of abortion, one that strips Idaho of its sovereign interest in protecting innocent human life and turns emergency rooms into a federal enclave where state standards of care do not apply.”
However, according to the Justice Department, the guideline just clarifies already-existing federal law. Federal officials maintain that state laws prohibiting abortion that took effect last year are superseded by that federal legislation.
Pregnancy can cause serious medical issues in some women, such as sepsis, uncontrollable bleeding, renal failure, and loss of fertility, which would not be covered under provisions for the life of a mother.
Idaho was backed by twenty conservative states, many of which had strong abortion prohibitions. However, the recommendation from the Biden administration may possibly affect more states than just conservative ones with stringent limitations.
Those with more generous exemptions than Idaho’s, or those without outright bans on abortion, may also be impacted. Even if their state legislation would normally permit abortions, religiously affiliated institutions that accept federal financing but refuse to perform them are subject to the federal statute in question.
Earlier this month, a federal appeals court in California temporarily ruled with the Biden administration, preventing the implementation of the relevant portions of the Idaho statute. The Supreme Court’s decision merely resolves the issue temporarily and forbids the Idaho law’s execution while the underlying legal dispute is resolved in the lower courts.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
Texas Congressman Chip Roy asks “how can we do our fundamental duty of protecting our border when we keep writing checks to Ukraine and Israel for their border security.”
In a major blow to Biden’s Green New Deal, a giant offshore wind project that was in the works has been canceled off the coast of New York.
On January 22nd, Politico and USC are hosting a senate debate with only four candidates.
The monthly jobs report for December, released today, reveals that U.S. employers added 216,000 jobs last month, surpassing expectations of 170,000.
SpaceX sued a U.S. labor board to block its case accusing the company of illegally firing employees calling CEO Elon Musk “a distraction and embarrassment.”
ChatGPT was well on its way to becoming a household name even before 2023 kicked off.
Apple fell nearly 3% to a seven-week low after Barclays downgraded the shares on concerns demand for its devices will remain weak in 2024.
Bitcoin galloped past $45,000 for the first time since April 2022, buoyed by optimism around the possible approval of exchange-traded spot bitcoin funds.
rnrn
How does the court’s ruling on Idaho’s restriction on abortion in emergency rooms impact the debate surrounding abortion access?
S and in-depth analysis on abortion and other important issues by subscribing to OAN’s Brooke Mallory.
Overall, this Supreme Court decision has significant implications for the debate surrounding abortion access in the United States. By rejecting the Biden administration’s attempt to expand access to abortions in hospitals in red states, the court has signaled a potential shift in its approach to abortion cases.
Idaho’s restriction on abortion in emergency rooms, which requires doctors to prove that the mother’s life is in danger, was upheld by the court. The Biden administration argued that emergency departments are mandated to provide ”stabilizing care,” including abortions, in a wider range of situations. However, the court ruled that Idaho’s law is not in conflict with separate federal legislation.
This case comes just over a year after the Supreme Court reversed the landmark Roe v. Wade decision. The court’s decision to hear arguments in this case in the spring suggests that the issue of abortion will continue to be a major focus for the court in the coming years.
In addition to this case, the Supreme Court has also accepted a conservative appeal against the FDA’s clearance of the abortion drug mifepristone. These developments highlight the ongoing legal and political battles over the issue of abortion in the United States.
The Biden administration’s position is that federal law mandates hospitals to offer the same treatment to expectant patients, including the option of an abortion if necessary, regardless of state restrictions. However, Idaho officials argue that this interpretation of federal law undermines the state’s ability to protect innocent human life and interferes with their authority over healthcare standards.
This decision has broader implications beyond just Idaho. It could potentially impact other states with less stringent abortion limitations or those that allow exemptions for religiously affiliated institutions. The court’s ruling may also have repercussions for states that receive federal funding and are required to provide stabilization treatments to patients, even in cases where the patient is unable to pay for it.
While this decision temporarily prevents the implementation of the Idaho law, it does not provide a final resolution to the underlying legal dispute. The case will continue to be litigated in the lower courts, and the final outcome could have far-reaching consequences.
As the debate over abortion continues to evolve, it is essential for individuals to stay informed about the latest developments and legal rulings. Subscribing to Brooke Mallory’s updates can provide valuable insights into this issue and other important topics.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
