Washington Examiner

Senate Democrats plan to advance a bill enforcing a binding ethics code for the Supreme Court, despite Republican opposition.

The ⁣Senate Judiciary ⁤Committee to ​Debate⁢ Bill Imposing Ethics⁣ Code for‌ Supreme Court

The Senate Judiciary‍ Committee⁤ is ⁣set to⁢ discuss and​ vote‌ on⁤ a‍ bill​ supported by ⁣Senate⁤ Democrats that⁣ would‍ establish ⁢a binding ethics code‍ for the Supreme Court.⁢ The bill, ⁤introduced by‌ Sen.⁢ Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI),⁢ aims to‌ introduce ​new⁣ requirements ⁢for‍ financial disclosures and recusal‍ in cases‍ where a justice ⁣may​ have⁣ a⁤ conflicting‍ interest.

Concerns⁣ Over Justices’​ Conduct

The hearing, ⁢scheduled for 9:30‍ a.m., ⁤follows recent ⁤reports revealing that some⁣ Republican-appointed ‌justices failed⁣ to disclose⁤ trips ​funded‌ by​ wealthy​ GOP ‌donors and⁤ undisclosed real ⁢estate transactions. ⁣Sen.⁤ Dick ​Durbin (D-IL), the⁢ committee chairman,​ expressed his concerns⁣ about the conduct of ‌the⁢ justices ⁤outside⁢ the courtroom, ⁣stating, “Just about every ⁤week now,⁢ we learn ⁢something new and deeply troubling about ​the ⁢Justices ⁤serving ‍on ‍the Supreme‍ Court—the ⁤highest court‍ in​ the land​ in the ​United States—and their conduct outside⁣ the ⁢courtroom.”

He further emphasized the ⁤potential ⁢consequences for members of‌ the Senate if they⁣ were ‌to engage in similar conduct, saying, “Let ‌me ​tell you, ‌if I or‌ any member⁣ of the Senate failed to​ report ​an all-expense paid luxury getaway or if​ we used our⁢ government staff to help sell books we ⁣wrote, we’d ‍be in big trouble.”

Symbolic Hearing Ahead of 2024 ⁣Election

While Republican committee ⁢members are ‌expected ‍to oppose the ​bill, the hearing⁤ is seen as​ more ‌symbolic, with Democrats likely​ using the opportunity to‍ advance their ‍agenda ahead⁢ of‍ the ‌2024‌ election. The increased ‌criticisms ⁢of the 6-3 ‍Republican-appointed supermajority‍ on the Supreme ​Court ⁢have‍ prompted ⁣Democrats ⁤to take ​action.

“It’s not gonna⁣ get 60 votes⁣ in‍ the Senate⁤ and certainly isn’t ‍going to pass the ‍House ‌because the‌ Republicans say⁤ they​ see⁣ this a ⁣backdoor⁤ attack on the court’s jurisprudence‌ with ‌the six⁣ conservatives,” ‍said Russell Wheeler, a ⁤governance studies expert ⁤with the⁣ Brookings ‌Institution.

Republicans’ ⁤Concerns⁢ and ⁣Proposed ​Alternatives

Some ​Senate Judiciary Committee‍ Republicans ‍argue ⁣that the ethics reform push ‍is an​ attempt ​by‌ liberals ‌to undermine​ the court and believe​ that the ‍justices should ⁤establish‌ their own policies. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) acknowledged the effort to ‍discredit⁢ the court​ by his colleagues across ⁣the aisle but also encouraged the Supreme ‍Court to⁤ take action to ‌restore public confidence.

Republicans, ⁤including Sens.‍ John Kennedy⁢ (LA),‌ Marsha Blackburn (TN),‌ Chuck ​Grassley⁣ (IA), Thom Tillis ⁢(NC), ​and⁤ Ted ‍Cruz (TX), expressed their opposition to Whitehouse’s bill,⁣ stating‍ that it is unlikely⁤ to pass⁢ the Senate or⁣ the House.

When asked about Chief Justice John ⁤Roberts’ role in ‌addressing​ the ⁢court’s⁢ issues,​ Graham emphasized⁣ that‌ the​ decision should⁤ be​ left ‍to Roberts. Roberts⁢ declined an ⁣invitation ​to⁢ testify⁤ at⁤ a previous⁣ hearing, citing the⁤ importance of preserving judicial independence.

Whitehouse’s Bill and⁤ Potential Changes

Whitehouse’s ⁢bill ⁣would ⁣require​ the ⁣Supreme ⁢Court⁣ to⁤ adopt⁤ a code‍ of conduct ‌and establish ‍a ‌mechanism to investigate ​alleged violations.⁤ The Supreme Court has previously shown interest⁤ in‌ ethics changes,⁤ with ⁤Justice ⁢Elena ⁢Kagan mentioning ⁢in 2019 ​that⁣ Roberts was considering ​a code⁢ of ethics.

According⁤ to governance studies‌ expert ‍Russell ​Wheeler, ⁢if ⁤the ⁤justices took‍ the initiative ⁤to draft ‌a code of ethics, ⁤it could help address some of the criticism. ​However, there may ⁣be some holdouts⁣ on ⁤the⁢ court, ⁣such ⁤as ⁢Justices Samuel⁤ Alito or‌ Clarence Thomas,​ who have been‌ the ⁣focus of Democrats’ ⁣complaints⁢ regarding their ⁢disclosures.

Wheeler​ also noted that some ⁢members⁣ of​ the ⁣court may⁤ be⁢ hesitant to ‍adopt an ethics‍ code ⁣at this time ⁢to​ avoid the perception of‍ pandering ⁢to the ⁤media ‍or​ the Democrats.

Click here to read more from The​ Washington Examiner.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker