Senate GOP negotiators oppose Johnson’s criticism of leaked bipartisan border deal terms
The Truth Behind the Border Security Deal: Don’t Believe Everything You Hear
The top Senate Republican negotiators are setting the record straight on the bipartisan border security deal, urging people not to believe reports about the agreement. This comes after House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) dismissed the terms mentioned on a news broadcast.
Johnson took to X, formerly Twitter, to share a photo of a Fox News graphic that listed the alleged terms of the agreement, which has not yet been released by the negotiators.
What’s in the Deal?
- Increase the number of available green cards by 50,000 annually
- Allow work permits for adult children of H-1B visa holders
- Grant immediate work permits to every illegal migrant released from custody into the U.S. interior
- Provide taxpayer-funded lawyers to unaccompanied alien children and mentally impaired migrants
- Allow 5,000 migrants per day into the U.S.
- Restrict parole for those who enter the country between ports of entry without authorization
However, Johnson made it clear that the House would “absolutely not” pass legislation that includes such measures.
Senator James Lankford (R-OK), the lead GOP negotiator, emphasized the importance of reading the border security bill before passing judgment. He also advised people not to believe everything they read on the internet.
Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), another key player in the negotiations, highlighted the importance of truth over falsehoods. “A lie has speed but the truth has endurance,” he stated.
Tillis reassured the public that the leaked information about the deal does not reflect what is actually on the table. He explained that Republicans will only agree to a deal that addresses the abuse of the asylum system and the Biden Administration’s misuse of parole to release illegal immigrants.
According to Tillis, Senator Lankford has been instrumental in holding President Biden and Secretary Mayorkas accountable for their failures at the border. Lankford’s efforts aim to secure the border and put an end to the disastrous influx of illegal immigrants.
A bipartisan group of senators has been working tirelessly for over a month to negotiate a border security deal. This deal would be added to a defense spending bill that includes aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. Both sides acknowledge that the border measure is crucial for passing the legislation through both chambers.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), a staunch ally of Ukraine, has expressed his support for the larger supplemental package as long as it includes ”credible” border policy changes.
Senators Lankford and Chris Murphy (D-CT) have been leading the negotiations, focusing on changes to federal asylum policy and the Biden administration’s use of humanitarian parole authority. Senator Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) has also played a significant role in the talks.
There have been reports of the White House offering to establish a new border expulsion law and increase mandatory detention rates as part of the negotiations. However, no one from the Senate working group or the Biden administration has confirmed these reports publicly.
Johnson has been adamant that the border provision in Biden’s defense legislation aligns with the Senate’s version of H.R. 2, the House Republicans’ signature border bill.
Senate GOP negotiators, on the other hand, have clarified that they are not demanding Democrats agree to H.R. 2. They understand the dynamics of the Senate and the need for bipartisan cooperation.
Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) predicts that the GOP will remain united on policy and strategy regarding the border issue. He believes that GOP leadership will block a supplemental bill that lacks adequate policy changes, as they currently have significant leverage.
It’s important to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the border security deal. The negotiations are ongoing, and the leaked information may not accurately represent what is being discussed. Stay informed and don’t believe everything you hear.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
What are the potential consequences of insufficient funding for national security priorities on military families?
To military families and funding for national security priorities.
However, it is important to note that the terms listed in the leaked information may not accurately represent the final agreement. Negotiations are complex and often involve multiple revisions and compromises. It is crucial to wait for the official release of the border security deal before making any judgments or assumptions.
The Senate Republican negotiators are committed to addressing key issues such as the abuse of the asylum system and the release of illegal immigrants through parole. They are working towards an agreement that reflects these concerns and promotes effective border security measures.
While there may be disagreements and differing opinions among lawmakers, it is important for the public not to jump to conclusions based on leaked information or sensationalized media reports. It is always advisable to rely on official statements and verified sources when seeking accurate information.
As the negotiations continue, it is crucial to keep in mind the ultimate goal of securing the border and finding solutions that prioritize the safety and well-being of all Americans. Constructive and informed discussions are essential in order to reach a bipartisan agreement that effectively addresses the challenges of border security.
In conclusion, the truth behind the border security deal should not be blindly accepted or dismissed based on preliminary information or personal biases. It is important for the public to remain informed and engaged in the ongoing negotiations, and to rely on credible sources for accurate updates on the progress and details of the agreement. The final deal will only be known once it is officially released, and until then, it is crucial not to believe everything you hear or read.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...