Washington Examiner

Senate Judiciary Committee to vote on Crow and Leo subpoenas this week

The Senate Judiciary Committee to Vote on Subpoenas for⁢ GOP Megadonor and Federalist Society Co-Chairman

The Senate ‌Judiciary Committee is set to vote on Thursday morning⁢ to decide whether to⁤ issue subpoenas for ⁢Harlan ‍Crow, a prominent ‌GOP ‌megadonor, and Leonard Leo, the Co-Chairman of the Federalist Society. ⁢This comes after months of scrutiny on the​ Supreme ‍Court’s ethics code.

Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) confirmed that the ‌subpoena timeline⁣ is on ‌track, stating, “That’s the plan,” when asked by ⁤reporters on Tuesday. Durbin had previously expressed concerns about the lack of cooperation from​ Crow and Leo in ‍responding to the committee’s requests for records related to financial and ​social connections with Supreme Court justices.

In November, Durbin abruptly ended​ a meeting before senators could vote on ⁢the ‍subpoenas due‍ to numerous ‍amendments proposed by Republicans, who sought⁢ to‌ subpoena associates of the Biden administration. Some of these GOP proposals may also be up for a vote on Thursday.

“We’re going ‍to take a look at each one and decide whether it’s​ germane and proceed from there,” Durbin explained to reporters, as reported by Politico.

Investigation‌ into‍ Allegations of Unethical Financial Gifts and Conflicts ‍of Interest

The committee’s objective ⁣is to⁢ obtain documents from Crow and Leo‍ to aid⁣ in their investigation into allegations ⁢of unethical financial​ gifts and potential conflicts ​of interest‍ arising‍ from personal connections with billionaire donors and activists.

ProPublica’s reporting earlier this ⁣year revealed‌ that Justice Clarence Thomas failed to disclose multiple trips funded by Crow.‍ While current rules require justices to disclose gifts exceeding $415, the guidelines regarding gifts such ​as travel or lodging remain unclear.​ The report also ‌uncovered transactions involving Thomas and his ‌family, including tuition payments for his grandnephew. ⁢Crow declined ​to provide a comprehensive account of the ⁤gifts when‍ requested in ​May.

Similarly, Leo refused to ⁤disclose‍ any information regarding ⁢travel, payments, or gifts involving Supreme Court justices, dismissing the request from Senate Judiciary ⁣Democrats​ as “political retaliation.” This request came after a ⁣ProPublica report exposed a luxury fishing trip in 2008 that ⁢Justice Samuel Alito had allegedly taken with Leo and billionaires Paul Singer ⁢and Robin Arkley ⁣II.

Senate Judiciary Republicans ​argue that⁤ if the committee votes to subpoena Crow and Leo, Senate‍ Democrats must ‌also pursue liberal advocates in the same manner. They have proposed over 150 additional subpoenas to expand ⁣the investigation, claiming⁢ that it unfairly targets conservative ⁤justices ⁢on the ⁣Supreme Court.

One of the proposed amendments by Sen.⁣ Marsha Blackburn ⁤(R-TN)⁣ calls for subpoenas ​targeting Justice Sonia ⁤Sotomayor’s staff and book publisher, highlighting the partisan nature of the proceedings.

Impact of the ‍Supreme Court’s Newly Adopted Code of Ethics

On ‍November⁤ 13, ‌the Supreme ⁣Court adopted a code of ethics for the first ⁣time⁣ in⁣ its history. It remains uncertain‍ whether this recent development has affected the progress of Senate​ Democrats’ investigation.

Click here to read more ‌from The ‌Washington Examiner.

How ⁣has the lack of cooperation from Crow and Leo in providing requested documents raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest and unethical behavior within the Supreme​ Court?

Gifts and conflicts of interest involving Supreme Court justices. The scrutiny on the Supreme Court’s⁣ ethics code began following several high-profile cases and decisions‍ that raised questions about the impartiality and integrity of the court.

Harlan Crow, a prominent ‌GOP megadonor, and Leonard ⁢Leo, ‍the‌ Co-Chairman of the⁣ Federalist Society, have ‍been the ⁢subject of particular attention due ⁣to ‌their close ties to conservative ​justices and their ⁢significant financial contributions to ⁣political campaigns. The Senate Judiciary Committee ⁤has requested records from⁤ both individuals regarding‍ their‍ financial and social ⁣connections with⁤ Supreme Court justices.

However, Crow and Leo have been reluctant to cooperate with ⁤the committee’s requests. Their‌ lack of responsiveness ⁢has ⁢raised concerns that they may be hiding ⁤important information related​ to potential conflicts of ⁤interest and unethical‌ behavior. Committee Chairman Dick Durbin​ has expressed frustration‌ over their lack of cooperation and has emphasized ‍the importance of‌ obtaining⁣ these documents to ensure the integrity ‌of the Supreme Court.

The decision⁣ to vote⁣ on subpoenas for Crow and Leo comes ​after ⁣a previous meeting ⁤in November was ⁤abruptly ended⁣ due to Republican senators proposing amendments to‌ subpoena associates of the Biden‍ administration. While some of these GOP proposals may also be considered on ‌Thursday, Durbin has ⁣assured reporters that each proposal will be carefully ⁣evaluated⁤ to determine its‌ relevance to the committee’s investigation.

The objective of this investigation is to uncover any potential financial gifts or conflicts of interest that may have ⁢influenced Supreme ⁤Court ⁣justices’ decisions on significant cases. The integrity and impartiality ⁣of the court are of utmost​ importance, and it ⁤is crucial that ⁤any⁤ allegations of ⁢unethical behavior are​ thoroughly investigated.

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s‌ vote on subpoenas for ⁢Harlan Crow and ⁢Leonard​ Leo is a significant step in this investigation. It demonstrates the committee’s commitment to⁤ ensuring transparency⁣ and accountability within the Supreme Court.​ The ​documents requested from‌ Crow and Leo could shed ​light on any undisclosed financial ⁣relationships or conflicts‍ of interest that may have compromised the integrity ‍of​ the court.

The outcome of this vote will determine‍ whether Crow ​and Leo will be legally compelled to provide the requested documents. If ‌the subpoenas⁢ are approved, it will send a strong message that ‍no​ one ⁣is above ​the law ⁢and that the ⁤committee will not tolerate any attempts to obstruct or hinder ⁣the investigation.

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s decision will have implications not only for the ​current investigation but ⁢also ⁤for the future‍ of ‌the Supreme Court.​ It will set ‍a precedent‌ for holding individuals accountable for potential ethical violations and ensuring the court’s impartiality and integrity remain intact.

As the Senate Judiciary Committee prepares for the⁢ vote on Thursday morning, the eyes of the nation will be on the⁣ outcome. The decision to issue subpoenas for Harlan Crow ⁢and Leonard​ Leo⁣ will have a significant impact on ‌the ongoing investigation into unethical financial gifts and conflicts of interest within the Supreme Court. The American ⁢people ⁤deserve a transparent and impartial ⁤judiciary, and this ‍vote is a crucial step in ⁤that pursuit.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker