The daily wire

Megyn Kelly slams media on E. Jean Carroll/Trump case: ‘She’s crazy! What can he say

Megyn Kelly Challenges⁣ $83 Million ⁣Fine ⁣Against Trump in ‍Defamation Case

Journalist and podcast host Megyn Kelly expressed her concerns ‌about the hefty $83 million fine that former President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay in⁣ the defamation case ⁤of writer ​E. Jean Carroll. Kelly also criticized‍ the media’s coverage ​of the case.

Kelly raised the possibility that Carroll may not be telling the truth⁢ and that Trump ⁢should be allowed to defend himself ⁣if he didn’t assault her. She questioned why the media is not ⁢open to considering this perspective.

“She’s a⁣ wack job! What’s he supposed to say?” Kelly‌ exclaimed, highlighting the ‍lack of ⁤consequences for Carroll’s public criticism of Trump.

Furthermore, Kelly emphasized that Trump was never criminally convicted for assaulting Carroll, and the decision was made by a civil jury based on the ‍likelihood of the assault.

She also ⁤pointed ‍out the challenges ‍of defending oneself ​against an accusation ⁢that occurred 30 years ago, highlighting the difficulty of recalling specific details from ⁤such a long time ago.

Joining Kelly on the episode, ‍journalist‍ Glenn Greenwald expressed his concern ⁢about ⁤the “weaponization ‍of the judicial system” and the bias of some judges against Trump.

Trump has consistently ⁤denied assaulting Carroll‍ and claimed not to know her. Throughout ⁣the trial, he used social media to criticize the writer.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

In one ‍instance, Trump shared a viral video of Carroll discussing rape with CNN anchor Anderson Cooper, where she made controversial statements. Trump captioned ‌the video, “Can you believe I ​have to defend myself against this woman’s fake story?”

Related:​ Court ​Fines Trump $83.3 Million, Over Eight Times Lawsuit’s ⁤Request, In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case

What concerns does journalist‍ Glenn Greenwald raise​ about⁢ the judicial system ⁣and how ‍it is being ‌used against political ​opponents, as seen in the case ⁣of Donald Trump and E. ‌Jean ⁢Carroll

⁣In a recent episode of her podcast,⁣ journalist‌ and podcast host⁣ Megyn Kelly challenged the $83 million fine that⁤ former President⁢ Donald Trump ⁢has been ordered to pay in the defamation case of ​writer E. Jean Carroll. Kelly also criticized the media’s coverage of the ⁢case,‍ raising concerns about the lack of objectivity and open-mindedness in their​ reporting.

One ​of Kelly’s main points was the ⁤possibility that Carroll may not ⁢be telling the truth, and therefore,⁤ Trump should be ‍allowed to defend ⁢himself if⁤ he did not assault her. She questioned why the media is not open to considering this perspective and seems ⁣to give Carroll the benefit of the ⁢doubt ⁢without proper evidence.

“She’s a wack ⁢job!‍ What’s⁤ he supposed to say?” Kelly exclaimed, highlighting the lack of consequences for Carroll’s public criticism of Trump. She emphasized that Trump was‌ never criminally convicted for assaulting Carroll, and the decision was made by a civil jury⁣ based on the likelihood ⁢of ⁣the assault. Kelly argued that this should be taken into consideration when discussing the case.

Additionally, Kelly pointed out the challenges of defending oneself against an accusation​ that occurred ⁢30 years ago, highlighting the difficulty of recalling specific details from such a​ long time ago. She acknowledged the importance of taking allegations⁣ seriously but‍ also emphasized the need for⁢ fair and thorough investigation before jumping to conclusions.

Joining ⁤Kelly on the episode, journalist Glenn Greenwald expressed ⁤his concern about the “weaponization of ⁢the‍ judicial system” and the bias of some judges against Trump. Greenwald argued‌ that this ⁤case reflects a larger problem of⁢ using ‍legal mechanisms to attack political ⁣opponents, rather than seeking truth and justice.

Kelly’s comments and ⁤Greenwald’s concerns shed light on the ​potential flaws in the way the media and the judicial system handle high-profile‍ cases‍ involving public‍ figures. It is essential to maintain objectivity, ⁤fairness, and due process, regardless ⁣of personal biases and⁣ political affiliations.

As⁤ this case continues to unfold, it is crucial for the media and the public to listen to different perspectives, consider all the evidence, and ensure ​that justice is served. Kelly’s challenge to the⁢ $83 million fine and ⁢her criticism of the media’s coverage serve as a reminder of the importance⁣ of a fair and balanced approach to reporting and analyzing legal matters.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker