South Carolina seeks to resume executions via lethal injection, firing squad, and electric chair

South Carolina ⁣Seeks to Resume Execution Methods After 13-Year⁣ Hiatus

After a ⁣13-year hiatus, South Carolina is looking to resume three execution methods:​ lethal⁢ injection, firing squad, and the electric chair. The decision is pending Tuesday’s oral arguments for four death⁢ row inmates’ lawsuits, which claim the methods⁤ are cruel and unusual ‌punishments.

Transparency Concerns ​Surrounding Lethal ⁤Injection

The inmates’ lawyers ⁢also plan to argue‍ Tuesday that the state’s​ 2023 law permitting lethal injection to resume isn’t ​transparent enough. The shield law was passed to protect the ‌identities of companies ⁢selling drugs used for lethal injection ⁤or any prison employees involved in⁣ the execution procedure.

South Carolina hasn’t ⁢executed someone via lethal injection in​ 13 years because the drugs they used expired and companies refused to sell them more unless their names could be protected, the Associated Press ⁤reported. South Carolina says the three⁣ forms ⁣of execution are acceptable to the state’s protocols.

“Courts have never held the ‍death has to be instantaneous or painless,” Grayson Lambert,⁤ a lawyer ​representing⁢ Gov. Henry McMaster’s (R-SC) office,‍ wrote.

Lawyers for⁤ Justice 360, an organization that helps fight for inmates on ⁢death row and seeks transparency in the death penalty process, are pushing back⁤ on ⁤the state law. Attorneys for the inmates are arguing that the shield law is unconstitutional.

“No inmate in the country has ever ​been put ⁤to death with such little transparency about how he or she would be executed,” wrote Lindsey Vann, a lawyer for Justice 360.

Decrease in Executions and ⁣the Default Method

Prior to 2011, South Carolina, which had 60 inmates on death row at the time, used‌ to conduct⁣ about three executions ‌a year,‍ the outlet reported. Inmates’ appeals and deaths⁤ have left just 33 ⁣inmates on the state’s death row since then, per the Associated Press.

In facing the⁣ challenges⁣ of⁣ accessing drugs⁤ for lethal injection, prosecutors have reportedly been sending fewer⁤ prisoners to death row, opting for ‌guilty ​pleas and life in prison instead.

Unless inmates choose otherwise, the​ default method of execution ‌in South ⁣Carolina is⁣ the ⁣electric chair. While the state authorized the‌ use ⁣of firing squads⁣ in 2021, it has not adopted ‌the newest form ‌of⁤ execution, nitrogen ⁢hypoxia, which was used for the first time last month on an Alabama ‍death row inmate.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ‌FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

What are the concerns regarding the lack of transparency and oversight in the sourcing and safety of ⁤drugs used in⁣ lethal injections for executions?

In executions, making it difficult for the public to know where the ‌drugs are coming from and if they are safe and effective. This ‌lack of transparency raises concerns about the legality and ethics of the lethal injection method.

Furthermore, there⁣ have been numerous documented cases of botched executions using lethal injection in other states. In these cases, ⁤the condemned individuals experienced extreme pain and suffering before death, which goes against the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition ​of cruel and unusual punishment. The inmates’ lawyers ‍argue that without proper transparency and oversight, South Carolina risks subjecting individuals to unnecessary ‍and inhumane suffering.

Controversy over the Firing Squad Method

Another method being considered by South Carolina is the firing squad. While this method may seem‌ archaic and barbaric to some, supporters argue⁢ that it is a more reliable and humane method‍ of execution compared to ‌lethal ⁢injection. They claim that a firing squad ensures a swift and⁢ painless‌ death, as it involves multiple bullets aimed at the heart and brain. Nevertheless, opponents argue that the firing squad method is inhumane and violates the condemned individuals’ human rights.

One of the main ⁢concerns with the firing squad⁤ method is ‌the potential for error. Despite the intention⁤ to achieve a quick and painless death,‌ there have been instances where inmates suffered prolonged and agonizing deaths due to poor⁣ marksmanship or other factors. Additionally, the use of a firing squad raises moral and ethical ‍questions about using state-sanctioned violence as a means of punishment.

The Return of the Electric Chair

The electric chair, often considered⁤ the most gruesome execution method, is also being considered by South Carolina. This method involves strapping ‌the ​condemned individual to a chair and delivering a powerful jolt of electricity to‍ their body, leading to a quick death. Critics argue that this method is​ inherently cruel and exposes the inmate to ⁤unnecessary pain​ and suffering.

While supporters argue that the​ electric chair is a reliable and effective method of execution, opponents contend that it violates the Eighth Amendment and international human rights standards. Furthermore, the use of the electric chair brings up⁣ concerns about the potential for accidents and malfunctions, which could lead to severe pain and prolonged suffering.

The Constitutional ⁤and Moral Implications

The resumption of execution methods in South‍ Carolina raises significant constitutional and moral questions. The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and⁣ unusual punishment, and the choice of execution ⁣method can be seen as a reflection ⁣of a society’s values and approach to justice.

Many argue ‌that the use of any execution method,​ regardless of its perceived humanity or efficacy, infringes on an individual’s right to life and should be abolished. They believe that there are alternative ways to achieve justice and protect ‌society without ‌resorting to ⁤state-sanctioned killing.

In conclusion, the decision to resume execution methods in South Carolina after a 13-year⁣ hiatus is⁣ a highly controversial and debated topic.‍ The pending⁢ lawsuits ⁤and oral⁢ arguments will shed light on the transparency concerns surrounding lethal injection and the debate over the firing squad ⁢and electric chair methods. The outcome of these cases will not only determine the fate of four death row inmates but also have broader implications for the future of capital⁤ punishment in the ⁤United States.