Speaker Johnson and Biden White House at odds over border security powers
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) Challenges White House on Border Security
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is engaged in a heated debate with the White House over President Joe Biden’s actions to secure the U.S.-Mexico border.
The disagreement revolves around the extent of executive powers that Biden can exercise in response to a surge in unlawful border crossings and the overwhelming influx of migrants in blue cities across the country.
A bipartisan group of senators is working on a deal that combines aid for U.S. allies with border security reforms. However, Johnson has already dismissed the deal as “dead on arrival” in the GOP-led House.
One aspect of the proposed agreement, as reported by Fox News, would trigger a Title 42-like authority to swiftly remove migrants at the border if the daily encounters exceed a seven-day rolling average of 5,000. Johnson strongly opposes any border “shutdown” authority that allows even a single illegal crossing, insisting that the number must be zero.
Any border “shutdown” authority that ALLOWS even one illegal crossing is a non-starter. Thousands each day is outrageous. The number must be ZERO.
— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) January 29, 2024
Senator James Lankford (R-OK), who is involved in the compromise deal, clarified that the provision in question is being misinterpreted. He emphasized that it is designed to shut down the border only in the event of a significant influx of people.
Johnson’s spokesperson, Raj Shah, provided further details on the speaker’s position, stating that the new legal authority sought by the President should not wait for a daily influx of 4,000 to 5,000 illegal crossings but should be implemented with zero crossings.
The White House spokesperson, Andrew Bates, responded by accusing Johnson of twisting himself into a pretzel to delay border security measures. Shah countered by referring to a letter Johnson sent to Biden in December, urging him to consider various options under existing law to address the border crisis.
Johnson listed several authorities at Biden’s disposal, including the power to restrict entry, expedited removal, discretionary detention, and mandatory detention. He called on Biden to take action and stop making excuses.
President Biden said “I’ve done all I can do” with executive authority to secure the border. That is simply untrue. He’s either lying or misinformed.
Here are just a few of the authorities at his disposal – if only he would use them:
• Presidential Authority to Restrict… pic.twitter.com/DMFCh4ZElq
— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) January 30, 2024
“That is simply untrue. He’s either lying or misinformed,” Johnson stated, emphasizing the authorities available to Biden. He called for action and an end to excuses.
As the debate continues, the issue of border security remains a contentious topic in American politics.
What are the key arguments made by Republicans in favor of stricter border controls and how do they contrast with the Democrats’ stance on immigration?
Rd (R-OK), one of the members of the bipartisan group, has defended the proposed agreement, arguing that it provides a necessary balance between border security and humanitarian concerns. Lankford stated, “We can’t shut down the border completely, but we also have to make sure that we have some authority to be able to push back on this crisis.”
Johnson, however, maintains his firm stance, emphasizing that border security is a paramount issue that requires a zero-tolerance approach. He asserts that allowing any illegal crossings undermines the rule of law and poses a threat to national security.
The White House has expressed its support for the bipartisan negotiations and the proposed agreement, viewing it as a comprehensive and pragmatic solution to address the border crisis. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki stated, ”We believe this agreement strikes the right balance between addressing the immediate challenges at the border and the root causes of migration.”
The clash between Johnson and the White House highlights the broader political divide on immigration and border security. Republicans argue that stricter border controls are necessary to protect national sovereignty, prevent human trafficking, and combat drug smuggling. They criticize the Biden administration for reversing several Trump-era policies, such as the construction of the border wall and the “Remain in Mexico” policy.
On the other hand, Democrats advocate for a more compassionate and humane approach to immigration, emphasizing the need to address the root causes of migration and create pathways to citizenship. They argue that the previous administration’s policies were inhumane and violated individuals’ rights seeking asylum.
The challenge for Speaker Johnson and other Republicans is to find common ground with their Democratic counterparts in order to pass meaningful legislation that addresses border security concerns while also addressing the humanitarian aspects of the issue. Compromise and bipartisan cooperation will be crucial to finding a solution that satisfies both sides of the aisle.
As the debate between House Speaker Mike Johnson and the White House continues, the urgency to secure the U.S.-Mexico border remains. The nation awaits a resolution that effectively addresses the border crisis, strikes the right balance between security and humanitarian concerns, and ensures the integrity of the immigration system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...