Speaker Johnson sets clear boundary on border ‘shutdown’ authority

House ‍Speaker Mike⁢ Johnson Takes a Stand‌ Against Migration Shutdown Authority

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) made a bold move on Monday, opposing the migration​ shutdown authority granted ​to the ‌president in the Senate agreement.⁣ This agreement ⁢seeks to provide aid ⁤for U.S. ⁢allies like Ukraine and‌ Israel while implementing crucial border security reforms.

The Louisiana Republican, ⁣who has already warned that the deal would be “dead ⁢on arrival” in the House if the rumors about the draft proposal were true, took ⁢to ‌social media to express his opposition to a controversial section on crossings.

“Any border ‘shutdown’ authority that⁣ ALLOWS even one illegal crossing is a non-starter. Thousands each day ‍is outrageous.​ The‌ number must be ZERO.”

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) January 29, 2024

Fox News recently reported ⁤that the Senate deal would establish ⁤a threshold of a seven-day rolling average exceeding 5,000 encounters a day to trigger a Title 42-like authority to quickly remove migrants at the border.

Senator James Lankford (R-OK), who has been working on⁢ the⁤ compromise​ deal ⁣with Democrats, ‍clarified that the⁤ section in question is being misinterpreted. He emphasized that the provision aims to ​shut down the border only ⁣in the⁤ event of a “rush of people” approaching, not allowing 5,000 people a day.

“This bill focuses on getting us to zero illegal crossings a day.​ There’s no amnesty. It increases the number of‌ Border ​Patrol agents and it‍ increases asylum officers. It increases detention beds so we can quickly detain and then⁣ deport ⁣individuals,” Lankford explained. “It ends catch-and-release. ⁣It focuses on ​additional deportation flights out. It changes ⁣our asylum process so that people can get a fast asylum screening at a higher standard and then get ‌returned back to their home country.”

The Senate negotiations aim‍ to implement immigration ⁤reforms and address President Joe ‌Biden’s‍ request for‍ approximately⁤ $106 billion in supplemental funds. These ‌funds would ⁣be allocated to U.S. allies, including‌ Ukraine, Israel, and ⁣Taiwan, as well as for ‍border security and humanitarian assistance.

Former President Donald Trump has⁢ discouraged⁢ the passage‍ of the ‌deal unless it includes everything needed ⁣to​ address the “invasion” of millions of people. ​He expressed confidence in​ House Speaker⁢ Mike Johnson’s ⁣ability to negotiate a perfect deal on ⁢border security.

Biden, who⁣ is running ⁤for ‍re-election this⁣ year and could potentially face ⁤Trump in a‌ 2024 general election⁤ rematch, has shown support for the bipartisan Senate negotiations on border security. He believes that ​if passed into law, the negotiated reforms would⁤ be the toughest and‌ fairest measures to secure the border in the history of the country. ⁣Biden also emphasized his⁢ willingness to use emergency authority‍ to shut down the ‌border if⁣ overwhelmed.

What message does Speaker Johnson’s vocal opposition send about⁤ the House’s stance on legislation compromising border security or allowing ‌for illegal crossings

Rigger ⁢a “migration‌ shutdown” to ⁣restrict the ​number ​of migrants crossing the border.​ This provision, if adopted, would essentially allow for a continuous flow ‌of illegal ⁤crossings as​ long as it does ‍not exceed the designated threshold.

Speaker Johnson vehemently opposes this provision, arguing that any border shutdown authority that allows even ​one illegal crossing is unacceptable. He insists that the number of illegal‌ crossings must be ‌reduced to​ zero, emphasizing the seriousness of the issue by stating that “thousands each ⁣day ‍is outrageous.”

His stance is rooted in the belief ‌that a secure border is a fundamental aspect of national security. The​ ongoing ⁤border crisis, exacerbated by ⁤the influx of ⁣illegal migrants, has ‍been a cause of concern ‍for many Americans. Johnson recognizes the need for border security reforms to address this crisis effectively.

However, the House ​Speaker also acknowledges the importance of ⁢providing aid to U.S. allies such as Ukraine and‍ Israel, as outlined in the Senate ⁣agreement. He believes that while it is crucial to provide support to⁤ these nations, it should not​ come at the expense of compromising border security.

Speaker Johnson’s opposition to⁤ the ⁢migration shutdown⁣ authority has garnered attention on social media, amplifying the public’s concerns over the current state of immigration. The issue of illegal crossings has ⁤long been a hot-button topic, and Johnson’s firm stance resonates with those who believe in upholding the rule of law and ‍protecting‍ national borders.

As the Senate agreement continues to be debated and reviewed, Speaker Johnson’s position serves ‍as a reminder⁣ of the importance ‌of ⁢finding a balance between assisting U.S. allies and ensuring the security of the nation. ‌His vocal opposition sends a clear message that the House will not support any legislation that compromises border ⁣security or allows for illegal crossings.

In conclusion, House Speaker Mike Johnson’s stand against ⁢the migration ⁢shutdown authority granted ⁣to the president in the ​Senate ‌agreement reflects his unwavering commitment ‌to⁣ border security. He emphasizes⁤ the need to reduce the number of⁢ illegal crossings to zero while also providing assistance to U.S. allies. This opposition signals a ⁤crucial moment in the ongoing ​debate over immigration ‌reform and highlights the urgent need for comprehensive solutions to address the border crisis.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases