Special Counsel Smith aims to strengthen Trump’s release terms.
OAN’s Daniel Baldwin
11:46 AM – Friday, October 27, 2023
In a new court filing, Special Counsel Jack Smith is seeking to make President Donald Trump’s conditions for release even stricter. This comes after a Federal Judge temporarily stayed her own gag order on the 45th President. One America’s Daniel Baldwin has more on what this could mean for Trump moving forward.
Lawmakers in Washington are questioning President Biden’s lenient sanctions policy towards Iran and its impact on funding recent terror attacks.
An alarming surge of anti-Semitism is sweeping through college campuses.
Arizona Congressman Andy Biggs weighs in on new findings from a medical examiner suggesting that George Floyd’s death in May 2020 may have been caused by the drugs in his system.
Exclusive interview with Rep. Brian Babin
Intel’s stock surges over 9% as the personal computer market bounces back from a prolonged slump.
Amazon.com rises 7% in a race with Microsoft to dominate the booming artificial intelligence market.
Malaysia’s communications regulator to issue a warning to TikTok and Meta for allegedly blocking pro-Palestinian content on their platforms.
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s fraud trial begins with opening statements from his lawyers.
rnrn
On what grounds did the Federal Judge decide to temporarily revoke Trump’s pre-trial release earlier this month?
Decision to revoke Trump’s pre-trial release earlier this month.
The Special Counsel’s filing argues that Trump has repeatedly violated the conditions set for his release, including making public statements that could potentially obstruct the ongoing investigation. Smith is requesting a revision of the release conditions to include a gag order, prohibiting Trump from discussing the case or any parties involved.
The decision to revoke Trump’s pre-trial release was made by the Federal Judge after she found that Trump had violated the conditions set for him, which included refraining from making any public statements that could prejudice the case. However, this decision was temporarily stayed, pending further arguments from both parties.
The insistence on stricter conditions for release demonstrates the Special Counsel’s concern over potential obstruction of justice. Trump’s public statements have raised questions about his willingness to cooperate fully with the investigation and his respect for the legal processes in place.
In recent public remarks, Trump has continued to assert his innocence and question the legitimacy of the investigation. These statements not only risk prejudicing the case but also undermine the public’s trust in the legal system. A gag order could help mitigate these concerns by preventing Trump from publicly commenting on the ongoing investigation.
Critics argue that imposing a gag order on Trump would be a violation of his First Amendment rights. While individuals do have the right to freedom of speech, certain limitations can be imposed when it comes to ongoing legal proceedings. Gag orders are not unprecedented and have been used in high-profile cases to ensure the integrity of the judicial process.
It is important to note that the Special Counsel’s filing is only a request, and a final decision will be made by the Federal Judge. The court will carefully consider the arguments presented by both the Special Counsel and Trump’s defense team before making a ruling.
This latest development in the investigation into President Donald Trump’s actions highlights the ongoing tensions between the Special Counsel and the former President. As the legal proceedings continue, it is crucial to uphold the principles of due process and ensure that the investigation is conducted in a fair and impartial manner.
In conclusion, the Special Counsel is seeking to tighten the conditions for President Donald Trump’s release, including a gag order to prevent him from making public statements. This request comes after Trump’s pre-trial release was temporarily revoked due to his alleged violation of the initial release conditions. The court will now consider these arguments and make a decision that upholds the integrity of the ongoing investigation.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
