Democrat Pressley criticizes Walgreens for shutting down stores in minority areas: ‘Seeking explanations
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Slams Walgreens for Closing Locations in Minority Communities
On the House floor, Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) passionately criticized Walgreens Pharmacy for its decision to close its location in the Roxbury neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts. Joined by Sens. Edward Markey (D-MA) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Pressley demanded answers from Walgreens CEO Tim Wentworth.
“Shame on you, Walgreens,” Pressley exclaimed. “As a multibillion-dollar corporation, Walgreens needs to stop divesting from black and brown communities and start investing in them.”
“Having a website with talking points about health equity and underserved communities is not enough,” she added.
Walgreens cited local market dynamics and changing customer buying habits as reasons for the closures. However, Pressley argued that these closures disproportionately affect minority communities.
Addressing House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), Pressley criticized Walgreens for planning to close another pharmacy in the Massachusetts 7th District, a community that is 85% black and Latino.
“When a Walgreens leaves a neighborhood, they disrupt the entire community and take away essential items like baby formula, diapers, asthma inhalers, life-saving medications, and jobs,” Pressley emphasized.
“These closures are not arbitrary, and they are not innocent. They are life-threatening acts of racial and economic discrimination,” she declared.
Pressley also highlighted the closure of other Walgreens locations in low-income communities, such as Mattapan and Hyde Park within Massachusetts’ 7th Congressional District.
In response to the closure, Pressley, Markey, and Warren sent a letter to Walgreens urging the company not to close its Roxbury location. They argued that these closures contribute to the existing racial and economic disparities in these neighborhoods.
The closure of the Roxbury location proceeded as planned, leaving the community without a nearby pharmacy. The Washington Examiner reached out to Walgreens, Pressley, and Warren for comment.
What are the potential consequences of retail pharmacies closing in low-income and minority neighborhoods?
Ry neighborhood of Boston, which is predominantly African American. Pressley called the move a “direct attack on the health and well-being” of the community and accused Walgreens of perpetuating racial and economic disparities in healthcare access.
Pressley’s criticism comes in the context of a wider trend of retail pharmacies closing their doors in low-income and minority neighborhoods across the country. These closures leave residents with limited access to essential medications, health screenings, and other healthcare services. This lack of access exacerbates existing health disparities, as residents in these communities already face higher rates of chronic illnesses such as diabetes, hypertension, and asthma.
In her passionate speech, Pressley highlighted the importance of pharmacies as vital community resources, particularly for those without reliable transportation or who face other barriers to accessing healthcare. She pointed out that the closure of the Roxbury Walgreens would force residents to travel long distances to access basic medications, causing unnecessary financial burdens and additional health risks.
Pressley also criticized the inconsistency in Walgreens’ decision-making, pointing out that the company only seems to close its locations in minority communities. This raises concerns about whether race and economic factors play a role in determining which stores to shutter.
The congresswoman called on Walgreens to prioritize racial equity and demanded transparency in their decision-making process. She stressed the need for corporate responsibility in ensuring equitable access to healthcare services, especially in communities that are already marginalized and underserved.
Walgreens’ decision to close its Roxbury location is not an isolated incident. In recent years, numerous retail pharmacies have closed their doors in minority communities, leaving residents with few alternatives. This trend reflects a larger issue of healthcare disparities faced by marginalized communities across the United States.
Research has shown that the absence of pharmacies in low-income neighborhoods has far-reaching consequences. In addition to limited access to prescription medications, these communities also face barriers to receiving important immunizations, health screenings, and preventive care. As a result, health conditions go undiagnosed and untreated, leading to worsening health outcomes and higher healthcare costs in the long run.
Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach. Firstly, there needs to be increased investment in community health centers and clinics, particularly in underserved neighborhoods. These centers can provide essential healthcare services and bridge the gap left by the closure of retail pharmacies.
Secondly, there is a need for legislation that holds corporations accountable for their decisions to shutter stores in marginalized communities. This legislation should promote transparency and require corporations to assess the potential impact of closures on community health outcomes.
Finally, there needs to be a comprehensive effort to address the systemic issues that perpetuate healthcare disparities. This includes investing in education and job opportunities in minority communities, addressing structural racism in healthcare delivery, and expanding health insurance coverage.
Closing pharmacies in minority communities is not just a business decision; it has profound effects on the health and well-being of the residents. Rep. Ayanna Pressley’s condemnation of Walgreens’ decision to close its Roxbury location highlights the urgent need for action to address healthcare disparities and ensure equitable access for all communities. It is a call to corporations, lawmakers, and society as a whole to prioritize the health and lives of marginalized populations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...