Stephen King mocks conservatives over Trump fixation in latest book.

Stephen King Taunts Conservatives​ After Unhealthy Obsession with Trump Spills Over in Newest ‍Book

Trump Derangement Syndrome ​is highly contagious,‍ especially ⁣among ‍groups who ⁣have weakened immune ‌systems from an‌ inherent political⁣ bias.

It‌ doesn’t matter whether they’re elites or ⁢artists, politicians ⁣or bureaucrats, soccer ⁣moms⁢ or corporate executives — leftists are particularly susceptible to Trump Derangement ⁣Syndrome.

Take iconic horror writer Stephen ⁤King, for example. He has ‌a new novel ‍out, and it’s ⁤dripping with TDS. The​ novel is titled “Holly,” ⁢and, unlike King’s ‍previous ⁢work, it is blatantly political.

Before ‌the book hit the ⁣market on Sept. 5, King said‌ he was readying himself for a flood of ⁣hate. ⁤In an interview with Rolling Stone, King⁢ said, “I think that a lot of people are not going to ‌like it. ​I think that a lot of people — particularly people on​ the other side of the COVID issue and the Trump issue — are going to give it one-star ⁤reviews on Amazon.”

Why would King ​jump to such a conclusion unless the novel⁤ was intended to taunt ​ conservatives ‌ who were suspicious of the ⁢government’s⁢ COVID measures and supported Trump? Either⁢ King is paranoid ​or he ‍knows what he ⁢is doing.

Whatever the case, he’s not worried about offending a large swath of potential readers.

“But all I can say to those people is, ‘Knock yourself out,’” he told Rolling Stone.

King’s⁣ Political Novel

According to NPR, the⁤ main character, Holly, has to deal with not only⁤ the COVID-19 pandemic but⁣ with ​her mother’s recent death. Holly’s​ mother, you‌ see, was a COVID denier and refused to get vaccinated. COVID killed her.

King’s message is implicit but clear: ‌Those who ⁢questioned mask ⁢mandates or the hastily developed ⁢vaccines ​deserve to die.

In‍ the novel, which is set mainly in 2021, King not only takes on COVID but racism, ⁢homophobia, the Jan. 6 Capitol incursion and Trump’s “effect on the country’s zeitgeist and political discourse,” according ⁤to⁣ NPR.  “King has ‌never‌ been shy about his ⁤politics, but ‍‘Holly’ is one ⁢of his most ‍political novels to date, and‍ it’ll surely ⁢anger all​ the right people.”

The “right people” are the people on ⁣the right. Yeah, we get it. King’s theme is clear as a ‍freshly polished⁣ mirror: Trump supporters who⁢ had any ⁣reservations about school closures, mandatory⁣ vaccines and other government COVID measures be ​damned.

That’s a lot of people!

King’s Political⁣ Bias

The New York Times‘ reviewer Flynn Berry sums it‍ up nicely:

“From vaccinations to the Capitol riot,⁢ ‘Holly’ charges⁣ into‌ the thorniest contemporary‍ debates with gleeful ‌recklessness.” ⁣The ⁢writer might have added that King should no longer be considered as a novelist. He’s now a full-blown⁣ political activist for the progressive left.

I guess King’s already ​made his fortune and doesn’t care as much about how many books he ‍sells⁣ as he does which side of the political spectrum he appeals ​to. So‍ much ‌for “art for ​art’s sake,” where⁤ art is independent⁣ of any and all⁣ political functions.

One could⁣ argue that King ‌is not an artist anyway, and⁣ never has been. He’s more of an entertainer, ⁣and​ he used to be ⁣good at it. Who​ can ⁣forget “The Shining,” ‍“Carrie” or “Cujo”–⁣ all of which translated quite well ⁤into film? But that may be the problem with calling King an “artist.” The really great⁣ novelists — like Dostoevsky, Faulkner or Flaubert​ — produce works that are almost always better ‍than the inevitable film renditions.

Judging by reports, “Holly” is so ‍laden with political bias from the‌ outset that it’s difficult to see how‌ anyone could mistake it for⁢ anything approaching good literature.

King’s Overt Political Activism

When the reader first encounters Holly, according ⁢to Rolling Stone, she’s attending her COVID-denying mother’s funeral ⁣via Zoom. King’s bias shines forth in the details.‍ It⁤ would have been one thing⁣ for Holly to attend the funeral of her mother who died from ​COVID,⁣ but King chose to throw in ⁢the⁣ COVID-denying context, which​ gives ⁢away his political bias early on.

Those suffering from​ TDS will swallow the bait like a large-mouth bass‌ sucking down‌ a worm ⁢and keep on reading. King takes a real⁢ chance, however, with mentally healthy readers, or even those with milder cases ‌of TDS. Let’s face it, ‍a lot of Americans on both ​sides of the political divide ⁤don’t feel like‌ wasting ⁤their leisure time reading fictional accounts of COVID that are politically⁤ skewed.

It doesn’t help that King’s anti-Trump bias is already well-known.‍ Many will see “Holly” as King​ beating a dead pony. In one example among many,⁢ King went ​on record in 2022 as saying, “Trump was a horrible⁤ president and is ‌a horrible person,” according to Yahoo Entertainment.

“I think ⁤ [Trump] actually engaged in criminal ⁣behavior and,⁢ certainly,​ I felt that he ⁣was a sociopath who tried to overturn the American democracy not ‌out of any ‍political wish⁤ of ⁣his own but because he could ⁤not ‌admit‍ that he ​had lost,” King, then 74, told the U.K.’s Sunday Times.

King is⁣ entitled⁣ to his opinion, of course, and he’s welcome to do interviews to voice⁣ them. When his⁢ political obsessions about ⁢Trump start leaking into his ⁣novels, however, ​he ‍may be ⁢embarking on the ​road to oblivion. His⁣ body of work doesn’t have ‍the staying power of Edgar Allan Poe or H.P.‌ Lovecraft and the shift into overt political⁢ activism will‍ only weaken his reputation.

“Holly”‌ sounds⁢ more like a​ progressive rant than a novel, ⁣and that does not bode well for​ King or ‍his loyal followers.

King’s ⁣getting pretty old and it’s ⁢showing. It’d be nice⁤ if he went out in style, but it isn’t looking‌ good. ​At the rate he’s going, Stephen King is ‌just going to be another casualty of Trump Derangement⁢ Syndrome. History won’t treat him well. ‌He might ‍get an obscure footnote or⁣ two, ⁢but that’s about it.

The post Stephen King Taunts Conservatives After Unhealthy‌ Obsession with Trump Spills Over in Newest‌ Book appeared first on The Western Journal.

How⁣ have conservatives reacted to Stephen King’s novel “Holly”?

Iately/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>overreach​ are the ​villains‌ ‍in this story.

The Reaction

Unsurprisingly, conservatives did not⁣ take King’s ⁢latest work kindly. The‌ book​ has received an influx of one-star reviews on⁤ Amazon, most of them criticizing⁣ the author for injecting politics into his fiction.

One reviewer wrote, “I used to be a fan of Stephen King’s, but this book was nothing⁤ more‌ than a preachy ‍political rant. I read fiction to ‍escape the real world, not to be further subjected to ⁢the author’s⁢ agenda.”

Another reviewer commented, “I’ve enjoyed King’s novels for years, but it’s clear that his hatred for Trump and ​conservatives​ has ‍clouded his ⁣storytelling ability. This book was a disappointment.”

This is‌ not the first time King ⁣has expressed disdain for conservatives or been politically charged⁢ in‍ his writing. In 2019, he tweeted, “The news is real. The president is fake.” He even went so far as to block several Twitter users who disagreed with his views.

It seems that King has no interest in engaging in a fair and balanced discussion or ‌considering perspectives that⁤ differ from his⁢ own. His intentions ​with⁣ “Holly” were clearly to taunt conservatives and further divide his readership.

Conclusion

Stephen King’s newest novel, “Holly,” is a clear demonstration of his political bias and disdain for conservatives. By injecting his personal beliefs into his fiction,‍ King alienates a significant portion of his audience who read his books to escape the​ political discourse of the real world. While authors have the right to express their opinions, ⁢King’s blatant​ taunting and lack of regard for differing​ viewpoints is disappointing. It is a reminder that even acclaimed authors can let their personal biases overshadow their storytelling ability.

As ⁢readers and consumers, it’s important to be discerning and recognize when an author’s political agenda may be influencing their work. And for those who disagree with King’s views, perhaps it’s best to spend your ‍time and money on ​authors who prioritize storytelling ​over political propaganda.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker