Controversial New Portrait of Kate Middleton Sparks Curiosity: ‘What’s This?

The new portrait of Catherine,‌ Princess‍ of ⁢Wales, featured on Tatler magazine’s July cover, has sparked controversy. Painted by⁢ Hannah Uzor, the artwork’s interpretation has drawn strong criticism ⁣and ⁤comparisons to the princess’s actual appearance. The​ negative reaction from viewers and critics has led to a heated debate about the portrait’s accuracy and portrayal. The portrait of Catherine, Princess of Wales, unveiled on the cover ‍of Tatler magazine’s July issue by artist Hannah Uzor, has stirred significant controversy. Critics and audiences alike have scrutinized the painting’s depiction, triggering a polarized discussion on its fidelity to the princess’s likeness and the artist’s interpretation.


Lifestyle & Human Interest

By Jack Davis May 24, 2024 at 7:48am

A new portrait of Catherine, Princess of Wales, is being attacked as an insult to its subject.

The portrait is on the July cover of Tatler magazine, which gushed about it on Instagram and said it was painted by British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor.

Uzor said the painting is supposed to portray the princess, Kate Middleton, as she looked at King Charles’s first state banquet (November 2022). Uzor said she looked at pictures of the princess before painting the portrait, according to CNN.

“When you can’t meet the sitter in person, you have to look at everything you can find and piece together the subtle human moments revealed in different photographs: do they have a particular way of standing or holding their head or hands? Do they have a recurrent gesture?” she said in a statement.

Uzor also said Kate’s recent revelation that she has cancer was a factor in the portrait.

“All my portraits are made up of layers of a personality, constructed from everything I can find about them,” Uzor said.

The reaction has been highly negative.

“What on earth is this??! Never seen a worse royal portrait, yet they still made it a cover?! Poor Kate,” broadcaster Piers Morgan posted on X.

What on earth is this??!
Never seen a worse royal portrait, yet they still made it a cover?! Poor Kate. 🙄 pic.twitter.com/qk1z8rNa1k

— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) May 22, 2024

Is this portrait an insult to Kate Middleton?

British TalkTV host Ian Collins joined in.

It’s worse than I remembered when I saw it five minutes ago! Is the artist an adult?” he said on X.

Ian Collins slams Tatler magazine’s front cover portrait of Kate Middleton.

“It’s worse than I remembered when I saw it five minutes ago! Is the artist an adult?”@iancollinsuk pic.twitter.com/9DFOg4cVUO

— Talk (@TalkTV) May 22, 2024

Art critic Alastair Sooke spoke for many when he castigated the portrait in the Telegraph.

“Sorry, who is she meant to be? The Princess of Wales? You could have fooled me. Even by the standards of modern royal portraiture (and there have been many abominable likenesses of senior members of our royal family produced over the past century), Tatler’s new cover image – an “exclusive” portrait of the Princess of Wales by the British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – is egregiously, intolerably, jaw-hits-the-floor bad,” Sooke wrote.

A sign of the times 👇
When Romanticism re-possesses a society – delusional mediocrity erected as a virtue – one ends up with two insults to the #RoyalsFamily in a week.

King Charles: First official portrait, by Jonathan Yeo
Princess of Wales portrait for Tatler, by Hannah Uzor pic.twitter.com/qKloZUnvVP

— Reason Praxis | Make Sense (@ReasonPraxis) May 23, 2024

“Whatever you made of Jonathan Yeo’s recently unveiled crimson portrait of King Charles III – which, as various wags observed, looked as if it had come pre-attacked with tomato soup by Just Stop Oil protesters – at least the damn thing resembled its subject.

“But this? I’ve spent the past hour or so – time, incidentally, that I will never get back – scrutinising Uzor’s ‘likeness’, and, still, I cannot divine any flicker of resemblance between it and the woman it’s supposed to depict,” Sooke wrote.

He continued with the criticisms.

“Has there been a flatter, more lifeless royal portrait in living memory? (It’s no surprise to learn that Uzor based her picture on video footage of, rather than personal sittings with, her subject. And be aware, this is not an official commission.) Beneath a Lego-like helmet of unmodulated, monotonously brown ‘hair”’, this Princess of Wales has as much charisma as a naff figurine atop a wedding cake,” Sooke wrote.

“She holds herself with the bored bearing of an air stewardess about to begin an in-flight safety demonstration.”

That portrait on the cover is horrid! It’s an insult to HRH Catherine Princess of Wales. https://t.co/Eb0piILEN4

— ⚜️FAYE a WALE’S MAORI WARRIORESS🔱 👑🇳🇿🇦🇺🇬🇧 (@Fayesugarfree) May 22, 2024

“Even her outfit — which she wore to the King’s first state banquet — appears stiff, with that rigid blue sash restricting her like a seatbelt. Her tiara doesn’t sparkle and those diamond-drop earrings fail to shine; towards the image’s bottom edge, her gown seems to disintegrate into streaks of brittle wax,” he wrote.

Uzor, Sooke wrote, “has somehow transformed one of the most alluring women in the world into a cipher, an automaton, an icon of anti-glamour. She says that her portrait is meant to convey strength and dignity, but the figure she’s painted has a feeble, blow-away presence, drained of charm. Oh dear!”

______________________________________________

An Important Message from Our Staff:

In just a few months, the world is going to change forever. The 2024 election is the single most important election of our lifetime.

We here at The Western Journal are committed to covering it in a way the establishment media simply will not: We will tell the truth, and they will lie.

But Big Tech and the elites don’t want the truth out. That’s why they have cut us off from 90% of advertisers. Imagine if someone cut your monthly income by 90%. That’s what they’ve done to people like us.

As a staff, we are asking you to join us to fight this once-in-a-lifetime fight. Without you not only will The Western Journal fail, but America will fail also. As Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

Will you support The Western Journal today and become a member?

A Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.

This is the time. America will live or die based on what happens this year. Please join us to get the real truth out and to fight the elites, Big Tech, and the people who want America to fail. Together, we really can save the country.

Thank you for your support!

P.S. Please stand with us!

Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.

Jack Davis is a freelance writer who joined The Western Journal in July 2015 and chronicled the campaign that saw President Donald Trump elected. Since then, he has written extensively for The Western Journal on the Trump administration as well as foreign policy and military issues.
Jack can be reached at [email protected].

Location

New York City

Languages Spoken

English

Topics of Expertise

Politics, Foreign Policy, Military & Defense Issues



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker