Study: Many Democrat-run Cities are more dangerous than war zones

A new study has confirmed that it’s not fair to refer to violent Democrat-run cities like Chicago as “Chiraq” It would be unfair to Iraq.

The wars of aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq, or elsewhere have ended. The study did show that people who served in these wars were statistically significantly more likely to die or be shot than those who served in Chicago’s most dangerous areas. 

The following are the Post Millennial reported:
 

An analysis by the JAMA NetworkBrown University and University of Pennsylvania found that young men of military age in the United States were more likely to be in 20s. “zip codes with the most violence in Chicago and Philadelphia had a notably higher risk of firearm-related death than US military personnel who served during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

Research revealed that Philadelphia and Chicago are the most likely places for young men to be killed by gunshot wounds. This is despite the fact Chicago and Philadelphia being identified as areas where young men are most vulnerable. “The most violent areas in New York City and Los Angeles were associated with less risk for young adult males than these theaters of war.”

Although they were initially violent, the four cities that participated in the study (Chicago and Philadelphia; NYC, LA and LA) added fuel to the fire by defunding the police departments in 2020. 

The risk of firearm death in Chicago’s most dangerous zip code was found to be three times that of the risk of being killed in combat in Afghanistan, and four times the risk of death in Iraq. This zip code has a 6% chance of being shot. The violence rates in Chicago’s 10 most violent neighborhoods were more than those in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

The study was done while

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases