Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.
Washington Examiner

Supreme Court uses preferred honorific for first transgender lawyer in arguments – Washington Examiner

To write a summary in English, start with essential techniques derived from⁣ the search⁤ results that focus on how to summarize effectively.

1.​ **Identify​ the Main‍ Ideas**: A ⁤good summary captures the main points ‌of the original text. Begin by reading thoroughly to understand ⁣its ‍core message.

2. **Include Key Details**: While summarizing, incorporate significant details⁤ that support the main ideas, ​but avoid extraneous information.

3. **Use Your Own Words**: Paraphrasing is critical when writing a summary. This means expressing the text’s ideas in ​your own language rather ​than copying ⁤the text verbatim.

4. ​**Structure Your Summary**: Typically, a⁤ summary begins with an introductory sentence that‍ includes the title of the text, the author, and the‌ overall main point. Following this, present the main ideas and crucial details in a logical ⁢order.

5. **Keep it Concise**: Aim for brevity—summaries are generally shorter than the original text. Aim for⁤ a few sentences to a paragraph, depending on ⁤the⁤ length of the original material.

Using these guidelines, you can craft a summary that conveys the⁤ essence of ‍the text while‍ maintaining clarity and conciseness. For exmaple, if summarizing a fictional story, you would ⁤start with the title, author, and⁢ main theme, followed by a brief⁣ description of the plot ⁣without delving ‍into unnecessary details.

For more ‍structured guidance,resources like‍ the articles from Kellogg ​Community ⁢College⁢ and Indeed provide step-by-step approaches‌ and examples that can further enhance your summarization skills.


Supreme Court uses preferred honorific for first-ever transgender lawyer in arguments

Supreme Court justices on Wednesday used the preferred honorific of the first openly transgender-identifying person to argue before the high court during oral arguments in a landmark case on the ability of states to regulate hormone-based therapies for minors with gender dysphoria.

Chase Strangio, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union’s LGBT & HIV Rights Project, presented oral arguments on behalf of several families who sued against Tennessee’s law, Senate Bill 1, that prohibits the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and transgender surgeries for minors based upon their self-diagnosed gender identity.

Strangio, a biological female who identifies as a man, uses male pronouns.

The court documents addressed Strangio as “Mr.,” in line with court custom of using the preferred honorifics of people appearing before the bar.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett also referred to Strangio as “Mr.” in oral arguments.

The use of preferred pronouns has proved controversial in federal courts before. Judge Kyle Duncan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, for example, in 2020 wrote an advisory opinion dismissing a transgender defendant’s preferred pronouns.

The outcome of the case, United States v. Skrmetti, will have significant implications for the more than 20 other states with similar laws on the books.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker