DOJ’s Compromise Makes Special Counsel for Biden Family Corruption Ineffective.

Blowing the ⁢Lid​ off Biden Family Corruption

After years of stonewalling and concealment by​ the nation’s top bureaucrats, the ⁣truth about Biden family ‍corruption deserves to be blown wide ‌open.

Evidence that⁣ President Joe Biden⁢ and his ​family exchanged political favors for ‌cash from foreign adversaries is⁤ mounting,‌ prompting renewed calls by House ​ and Senate Republicans and whistleblowers for ​a special counsel.

Under normal circumstances, asking the attorney general to declare a “criminal investigation​ of a person or matter [by a special counsel] is warranted” to ⁤avoid potential conflicts of interest in ​the Justice Department is the best legal route to ensure bad actors ‌who sell out their country to line their own ​pockets are indicted, tried, and fined. But these are not normal circumstances, Merrick Garland is not a normal ‌AG, and participating in international bribery schemes is⁤ not normal vice president or president behavior.

Asking Garland to⁤ bestow special privileges and status on yet another ​one of Biden’s corrupt deep state attorneys to investigate⁢ the ⁤first family’s corruption ⁤would ultimately be a waste of time and taxpayer money because ‌it would require​ Americans to believe ⁣the DOJ applies equal justice. Spoiler alert: they don’t.

Rotten to the ‌Core

Ever since inquiries into Joe and his son began,‍ the DOJ, FBI, ⁢IRS, and other bureaucrats have done nothing but obstruct congressional oversight, lie, hide ⁢evidence, slow-walk investigations, and do everything ‌they ⁢could to shield the Bidens from scrutiny.

The FBI⁣ field office tasked with investigating Hunter ​Biden kicked⁤ off the concealment campaign‍ by asking Twitter to censor certain content ahead of the⁢ 2020 election. ⁤Recent‌ testimony from Laura​ Dehmlow, section chief of ⁣the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force, confessed that the FBI told Twitter Hunter’s laptop was real the⁤ day the New York Post published ‍its bombshell reporting,​ before the bureau quickly switched its narrative to ‍“no⁢ further comment.”

More recently, FBI Director Christopher ⁢Wray, even⁤ when faced⁤ with threats of contempt, refused to publicize⁢ the unclassified document alleging Joe’s role in‍ accepting millions⁢ to orchestrate the firing of​ the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating‍ his son’s company.

IRS whistleblowers,⁤ who⁤ faced‍ retribution from their agency ​for speaking up about​ the double standards in ‍the Biden investigation, were also not privy to the bombshell‌ FD-1023. Nor were they ⁣ allowed⁤ access ⁣ to all of the‌ evidence on Hunter’s laptop.

During‌ the IRS’s tax⁣ investigation of Hunter, the FBI tipped ⁣off the Biden team about surprise interviews, according to whistleblowers, who also testified that the younger Biden was let off the ‌hook for⁤ apparent⁢ financial⁣ crimes in‌ 2014-2015 because U.S. Delaware Attorney David Weiss allowed the ‍statute ⁢of limitations to expire. Weiss’s​ office also played⁤ a role‌ in concealing ⁣evidence of Joe​ and Hunter’s Burisma bribes.

Meanwhile, Weiss and Garland at best ​misled, and at ⁢worst ‍lied to Congress about⁢ the authority the U.S. attorney‍ possessed over “where, ⁣when, and whether​ to file charges” ‍ against Hunter.

The list goes on and on and on.

Appointing⁢ a special counsel ⁣from the same agencies​ that spent years covering up the corruption he would be tasked with investigating would​ be‌ far too little,‍ far ​too⁤ late.

Don’t Forget the Durham Disappointment

History⁤ shows that naming a special counsel who ⁤is miraculously effective and nonpartisan is a futile effort.

Take Special Counsel ⁤John Durham, for example. While corrupt corporate media and Democrats touted the Russia-collusion hoax as fact and repeatedly tried⁣ to⁤ remove former President⁢ Donald Trump ⁢from office, the special counsel quietly and dutifully pulled ⁢together a 306-page report detailing grave misconduct by the Obama-era DOJ and FBI ⁣during the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. He even brought charges ‌against three known Russia hoaxers: Kevin Clinesmith ⁢ (who pled⁢ guilty but dodged jail time),⁢ Igor Danchenko, and Michael‍ Sussmann.

Durham successfully established ‍that‍ the government‌ massively abused its ⁣power against its citizens but ​his attempts to punish bad actors while protecting the establishment failed to get past the‍ deep⁢ state’s safety ‍nets. The best Durham ‍could offer following acquittals ⁣were strongly-worded⁣ recommendations to the‍ same agencies that “simply ignored or ‍in some fashion ‍rationalized​ away” protocols to ⁤undermine their sworn political enemy. Wray publicly confirmed ⁢ in 2022⁢ that none of the ‌FBI agents who were involved in Spygate have faced serious consequences.

In the face of malfeasance, even a skilled ​prosecutor like Durham only produced acquittals instead of accountability.

The⁤ only⁢ way to achieve⁤ true accountability for the⁣ corruption running rampant in⁣ the Biden administration is to impeach the president “and all of ⁤his top officials.” Republicans must follow through on ⁤their threats of ​contempt of‍ Congress​ and send a message‍ that unbridled ⁣duplicity⁣ is not welcome here.

[RELATED:[RELATED:Only ‍An ​Impeachment Inquiry Can‌ Unravel Biden Family Corruption And The Feds’ Role]

Considering the bureaucracy’s long track record of partisanship and weaponization,⁣ Republicans demanding a special counsel are either willfully shirking their responsibility to check the executive branch’s uncurbed​ power, ‌or foolishly trusting⁢ a⁢ system that has failed⁣ Americans time and ‌again.