The daily wire

The ‘Expert’ Class is collapsing right in front of us

The Collapse of the‍ Expert Class: From​ Defense to ⁢COVID

The Secretary of Defense ⁣is‌ out of⁢ commission, and no one’s even pretending anymore that ​the commander-in-chief has any idea what’s going on ⁢in the world.

So, unless you’re heavily invested in‍ weapons manufacturing, ⁣or​ sit on the board of Raytheon, you probably have a lot⁣ of urgent questions‌ about last night’s U.S. military strikes ‍in ⁤Yemen. You might wonder, for example, who ‌exactly the​ Houthis are,⁣ and⁣ why they made the decision to shut down a ⁢critical international‌ trade route by ​terrorizing ships in the Red ⁣Sea. It’s the kind of provocation that obviously justifies a response. It’s almost like they’re asking for U.S. military involvement​ in the region. You might also have questions about whether this is ⁤somehow a “wag the ‌dog” scenario, given ‌the Biden administration’s disastrous⁣ poll numbers.

Regardless of your position on yesterday’s missile strikes, these are fair concerns. You’re not a conspiracy ⁣theorist for asking about⁤ them. After years of relentless⁢ lies from cable news “experts”, the skepticism isn’t really noteworthy at all. In fact, at this point, even the experts themselves have basically conceded that they ​can’t be trusted. That’s become⁢ particularly ⁣clear in just the ‌past few days.⁣ From the airline industry to ​medicine, we are witnessing the collapse​ of the expert class in this country.​ They have lost their legitimacy, and they know ‌it.

You may have heard about Tony Fauci’s admission in a closed-door House committee ⁢hearing the other day. Fauci began⁣ by denying that he ever played a role in shutting down any schools ⁤in this country. That’s a lie, of course. Fauci’s agency provided official guidance calling on schools‌ to shut down, which exposed ‌those schools to civil liability ⁣if they refused. Then Fauci was asked about his infamous ⁤guidance ​that​ everyone needed to ‌“socially distance,” or⁣ stand six feet‌ apart. As you⁤ probably remember, this six-foot rule became ‌gospel in ​this country, virtually overnight. Every business and‌ school and government building⁢ and airport put up little placards and ​stickers on the ⁢floor, instructing everyone to obey. At the time, we were told that “the science” mandated this rule. But the other‍ day, Tony Fauci admitted what he always knew all along, which is that there was, in fact, no scientific data justifying⁣ this whatsoever. He​ says, essentially, that they just ⁣made it up ⁤on the spot. Here’s a New York Post reporter describing Fauci’s closed-door testimony:

The guidance “just appeared,” miraculously, like manna from heaven. Nobody knows where it came from⁢ or why, but there it was. Six feet apart they said, for no reason. Why not seven? Why not 10? ⁣Why not 100? Why not three? No reason. Literally no reason. Six feet is‍ just what was decided, ⁢by whoever decided it.

This isn’t the first⁢ time that Tony Fauci has admitted to ‌lying to the ‌public about COVID.‌ At one point, you may remember, he told the New York Times that he had deliberately misled Americans about the concept of⁤ “herd immunity,” by continually moving the goalposts.

Remember herd immunity? That was the idea that, once a certain number ‍of people became immune to COVID —‍ whether through infection or vaccination — ⁢then the virus becomes less of a threat, and we can resume our normal lives. Somehow, Fauci’s threshold for herd immunity kept changing throughout the pandemic. He kept saying that ⁤a bigger percentage of Americans needed to ⁣get the virus before herd immunity would apply. And then, ⁢when the ⁤Times asked him⁣ why he kept changing the percentage, he admitted it was just social engineering.

This week, though, Fauci dropped the pretense of “science” entirely. He just admitted he was making‍ stuff up. He was misleading us about pretty much every aspect of COVID — from social distancing to masks to the COVID ⁢shot to herd immunity. And now that he’s out of power,⁣ he can finally admit it because he knows he ​won’t suffer ‌any consequences.

WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show

This is one of those stories⁣ that’s getting buried, for obvious reasons. For ‌one thing, no one wants to hear about Fauci anymore. For a lot of different reasons, liberals and conservatives​ alike⁣ would prefer not to revisit that time in our recent history when Fauci was the most visible and powerful person in the country.‌ Also, admittedly, there’s a lot going on in the world. ‌Fine. But if you take ten steps back, you’ll see that the new expert class — the people who demand‌ to be taken as seriously as Fauci ⁤— are struggling to replace⁤ him. They simply have no credibility.

Recall again the story that⁢ broke the⁣ other day ⁢in ⁤Axios. Here’s what they wrote: “BREAKING: ​The climate of 2023 was the ⁢hottest seen in at least 125,000 years; for⁤ the⁤ first time in instrument records, daily global average temperatures went well above a Paris guardrail of 2°C.”

Along with that scary headline, Axios includes a chart that only goes back until the 1970s, strangely enough. ‍But all the same, they’re insistent that 2023 was the hottest ‌climate the world has seen in at least 125,000 ​years. Now, I could reference a ⁤bunch ⁤of experts who contradict this ⁣theory. I could tell you all⁢ about Steve Milloy, a senior fellow at ​the Energy and Environment Legal Institute, who‍ debunked this ⁣garbage science in the Wall Street Journal recently. Milloy pointed‌ out that — if you can believe it — we didn’t have ⁣satellites or temperature stations ‍to measure temperature 125,000 years ago. He also writes that even today, most of the ⁤world isn’t covered ​by temperature stations, and the temperature stations we do have ​are still quite inaccurate. In fact, he wrote, “it’s been estimated that 96% of‍ U.S. temperature stations produce corrupted⁤ data.” So‌ we can’t trust temperature data today — much less data⁣ from ​before human civilization was formed. But I really don’t have to cite any of this, because it’s all obvious to anyone with any common sense whatsoever. That’s why the comments on that Axios article are uniformly negative because⁢ people ‍aren’t ‌buying the lies anymore.

This is a trend that’s been causing a lot ‍of panic among experts and institutions that aren’t used to being challenged —⁤ including pretty⁤ much every corporate backer of the anti-white scam known as “diversity, ⁢equity⁣ and inclusion.” These are institutions that insist that ⁢DEI is a core part of their mission. They say their companies and universities simply cannot survive without it. But the⁢ moment you expose them, they run away in horror. All ‍you have to do is shine⁢ a light on what ‍they’re doing, and they give it‌ up.

That’s ⁤what just happened to Spirit‍ AeroSystems. ⁣That’s the manufacturer of the door ⁤that blew out on that ⁣Alaska⁣ Airlines flight recently, while the plane was taking ‌off. Yesterday, I came across a TikTok video that was uploaded‌ by a Spirit AeroSystems employee (or intern, possibly) about a year⁣ ago. This is footage from a conference for women in engineering. The video caught my eye, because the hashtags were “Women in Engineering” ⁤and ⁣“Spirit’s⁢ Dream Team.” So naturally I clicked‍ on the video. I wanted to see⁢ what an engineering “dream ‍team” looks like at a company that very clearly ⁣is incompetent at engineering. ⁤Here’s what⁣ I found:

Well, hey, what they lack in engineering talent and skill, they make up ‌for in sass. Now you⁢ can shout “girl power” while you’re being sucked out of the giant hole in the side of the plane at 30 thousand feet. This the “dream‌ team” ⁤at the company‍ that made the door that fell off a passenger plane flying over Portland the other day. And within about⁤ an hour of me posting that video on Twitter, the Spirit⁢ AeroSystems⁢ employee (or intern) took it down. ‌They know this is absurd. They know it’s⁢ completely incompatible with their mission. All you have to do is expose it, and ​they fold.

The same thing‌ just ⁢happened at Johns Hopkins Medicine. Hopkins’ “DEI office” — which exists, for some reason — sent​ out an⁤ email ⁤ to employees alerting them to potential patients who have unearned “privilege”. The list includes “Males, ‌Christians, White People, English-speaking people, Middle or owning class people, Cisgender People, Heterosexuals, and Able-Bodied ​people,” among ⁤others. I’ll say that again. Johns Hopkins Medicine believes that “males, Christians, White people, English-speaking people, Middle or owning class people, cisgender people, heterosexuals, and able-bodied people” are inherently “privileged.” And ​of course the word “privilege” is a very thinly veiled code. What Hopkins is really saying, of course,‍ is‌ that⁢ they don’t‍ like Christians, ‌or whites, or heterosexuals. ⁤They’re not looking at any real markers ⁢of privilege. They’re just indulging their bigotry.​ That’s ⁣the ‌unmistakable message there.

Keep in mind,⁣ this is a hospital and a medical school we’re talking about. They have the ability to administer treatments that can save people or kill ⁣them. ⁢Their only job is treating people.​ They should not be making⁤ lists about groups of people who are inherently inferior to other groups ‌of people. This kind of thing is threatening, actually. And they⁢ know that. That’s why, as‍ soon as this was published ⁣online by⁣ the X account “End Wokeness,” Hopkins⁣ took their little⁢ hit list ⁣down. Their DEI office issued a completely insincere⁣ apology and​ scampered away.

CLICK HERE⁤ TO‍ GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

Again, this is a pattern.⁤ Also yesterday — the same day that Hopkins took down its DEI list, and Spirit took down its TikTok video — Southwest Airlines deleted‍ a post on X about its “all-female flight crew.” The⁤ post read: “All female flight crew? Go off, queens!” But ⁤as it turns out, people don’t care about ‌the gender diversity of their flight crew. They care about competence. They care about​ not dying. ⁢And in no uncertain‍ terms, thousands ‌of people let‌ Southwest know ‍that. So, once again, they ‌erased the post and pretended it never happened.

It’s easy to take this kind of thing for granted. But just a⁤ few years ago, it would have ⁣been unheard of. Fauci ⁢never would have‍ admitted fault. Neither would Johns Hopkins, as they ‌told⁤ us to ⁣stay ‍socially​ distant and wear masks. Neither would the airlines, as they bombarded us⁢ with propaganda about the importance of DEI hiring. But now these frauds are being held to account. When ⁣they try⁣ to lie, like Axios did⁢ with their climate alarmists, no ⁤one buys it ​anymore. When they try to push their ham-fisted social ​engineering, people call them out‍ on it.

What this means is that the rule of the experts is ⁤over.

They can’t tell us to swallow DEI anymore than they‌ can tell us to wear a mask or stand six⁢ feet apart. For everyone who cares about competence and public safety, this⁤ is the ⁢best possible outcome. For bloated⁣ DEI bureaucracies, ⁣this development marks — at long last — the beginning⁤ of the end.

How⁣ can society demand ‌transparency, ‌accountability, and integrity‌ from‌ those in positions of authority and knowledge to⁤ prevent the collapse of the expert ⁣class

Conclusion:

The collapse of the expert class is becoming increasingly evident in⁤ various industries and fields.‌ From Tony Fauci’s admission of lying about⁣ COVID guidelines to institutions⁣ like Spirit AeroSystems and Johns Hopkins Medicine being exposed for their incompetence⁤ and bigotry, the​ credibility of experts is eroding. It is clear ⁣that the public no longer ⁤trusts these so-called experts who​ have been ‌proven to manipulate information ⁣and pursue their own agendas. As skepticism grows,​ it is important​ for individuals to question and critically analyze information presented ⁢by experts, ensuring that decisions and actions are based ​on sound judgment rather than blind trust. The collapse ⁢of the expert class ⁤serves as a wake-up call for society to demand transparency, accountability, and integrity from those in positions of authority and knowledge.


Read More From Original Article Here: The ‘Expert’ Class Is Crumbling Before Our Very Eyes

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker