The Fate of TikTok Has Been Decided as Court of Appeals Makes Big Decision

A recent ruling ‌by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has upheld a federal law that coudl lead ⁤to a ban on the popular app TikTok if its Chinese parent ⁤company, ByteDance, remains in control. this decision came after TikTok and ByteDance challenged the law, which is set to take ⁢effect on​ January 19,⁣ with the possibility ‌for ​President​ Joe Biden‍ to delay the ban for 90 ‌days if a sale of the company is underway.

Legislators from both parties have raised concerns that TikTok’s 170 million American ​users‌ might potentially be vulnerable to surveillance by the Chinese ⁣government and that the platform could be used to manipulate public opinion. The court’s ruling ⁤stated that while a TikTok ban could have meaningful implications, it ‌is⁣ indeed ‍necessary to‌ protect U.S. national security from foreign threats.

The ruling emphasizes that the government’s actions‌ are​ intended to safeguard free speech in the United States from foreign adversaries and that the national security rationale for‍ the ban is compelling. It also highlighted the government’s prolonged efforts to investigate⁣ the risks associated with TikTok and evaluate potential solutions.

In ⁤anticipation of the‌ ban’s implementation,discussions have emerged ⁣about the potential for incoming President⁣ Donald Trump to halt the ban or take other actions to undermine its enforcement. The‌ outcome of this legal challenge may ultimately reach the Supreme Court, with⁣ the impending deadline creating urgency for a resolution.


A federal law that would ban the app TikTok if its Chinese parent company remains in control of it has passed a legal challenge.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said it would not review a plea from TikTok and ByteDance, the Chinese parent company of the app, according to CBS.

The law takes effect Jan. 19. President Joe Biden can delay the ban for 90 days if a sale is in progress at that time.

The potential TikTok ban came about as legislators of both parties said that its 170 million American users could be spied upon by China.

Concerns have also been expressed that TikTok could use the platform to influence opinions by banning or emphasizing certain content as China might wish.

The decision sets up an appeal to the Supreme Court, which given the short time before the ban takes hold could either pause the law while it considers an appeal or allow the law to take effect.

“We conclude the portions of the Act the petitioners have standing to challenge, that is the provisions concerning TikTok and its related entities, survive constitutional scrutiny,” Senior Judge Douglas Ginsburg wrote in the ruling.

 “The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States,” the ruling said.

“Here the Government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States,” it said.

The ruling said banning TikTok could have vast implications, but that is not the government’s fault.

“Consequently, TikTok’s millions of users will need to find alternative media of communication,” the ruling said.

 “That burden is attributable to the [People’s Republic of China’s] hybrid commercial threat to U.S. national security, not to the U.S. Government, which engaged with TikTok through a multi-year process in an effort to find an alternative solution.”

The ruling said the national security grounds used for the ban are valid.

“The multi-year efforts of both political branches to investigate the national security risks posed by the TikTok platform, and to consider potential remedies proposed by TikTok, weigh heavily in favor of the Act,” the ruling said.

 “The government has offered persuasive evidence demonstrating that the act is narrowly tailored to protect national security,” the ruling said.

ByteDance and TikTok said that it would not sell its algorithm used to recommend content to anyone else.

President-elect Donald Trump is expected to intervene to halt the ban, The Washington Post wrote, citing sources it did not name. Trump takes office a day after the ban takes effect.

Alan Rozenshtein, a former national security adviser to the Justice Department, said Trump could have Congress repeal the law, simply choose not to have the Justice Department enforce it, or certify that ByteDance met the law’s terms.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker