The daily wire

The Race Card: A Path to Further Failure

We have now reached‌ the point in American life where⁣ in our ⁢racially divided society, there is⁣ a quick ​get-out-of-jail-free card, so ⁢long as you are a member of an intersectional ‍group.

If you’ve done something wrong, if you are accused of corruption, or ⁢if you are ‍accused of some sort⁣ of malfeasance, your get-out-of-jail-free⁣ card is, “You’re attacking me because I’m black.”

This has significant​ ramifications for American public⁣ life. The simple fact of ⁤the​ matter⁣ is that in a meritocracy, we should be able to point out when you are corrupt or when ‍you have failed. If every defense to failure is that the system itself ​is biased against you, that means ⁣failure will continue.

This is true system-wide, everywhere — from ​politics to administration, from the business world ‍to the⁤ educational world. When Claudine Gay gets fired from Harvard University, the​ basic idea is ⁤that it must be a racist system ⁢that⁤ got her⁣ fired.

There ‌is now no way to ​hold people accountable if they are from a minority race. If, ‌for example, you’re a​ politician and⁤ it turns out you’re deeply corrupt, and your first move is to claim America ‌is racist because that’s why you’re being targeted —⁢ if that’s believed — there is no way to get rid of corrupt officials so long as they⁣ are of minority status.

Once that standard is created and the basic idea becomes⁢ that ‍certain people in our society have a get-out-of-jail-free card and others do not, then‌ all standards collapse because a double standard is no standard at all.

WATCH: The Ben Shapiro ‌Show

The latest iteration of​ this particular foolish, divisive defense comes courtesy of ​a person named Tiffany Henyard. You might not have heard of Tiffany Henyard, but ⁤this is a burgeoning story about a small town mayor in Dolton, Illinois⁣ — a town of 20,000 people —  who’s been ‌alleged to have engaged in significant corruption on a vast scale.

This story was reported‌ in the UK Daily ‍Mail:

The⁣ first female mayor of a tiny Illinois village ⁢slammed her critics at a public meeting after she caused outrage by taking a $300,000 salary. Glamorous Tiffany Henyard was elected ‌leader of ⁢Dolton, a village of 20,000, in 2021, but ‌has since come under fire for what many see as her excessive spending. … She regularly engages the services of a professional hair and makeup team and ​stylist ​before public appearances‍ and photo shoots for the county’s taxpayer-funded billboards, which​ often feature the 40-year-old in what some see as shameless self-promotion.

Henyard has proposed a new law that would cap the next mayor’s salary at $25,000, unless she herself is the new mayor, a proposal many have deemed illegal.

“The scandal is just the latest to hit the beleaguered mayor, after she ⁤was slammed for hiring her former campaign worker as the town’s code enforcement officer despite the fact ⁣he is a convicted child rapist,” the Daily Mail continued.

Now‍ she ⁤is now being investigated for all of this. ⁤Her⁣ defense is a defense that has become the all-purpose defense for an enormous number of people in our post-George Floyd society.

She spoke about her alleged corruption and the reasons why⁢ she’s being targeted, saying, “You all should be ashamed of yourselves because ⁢you are all ‍black. You are all black!⁣ And you ‍all sitting up here beating and attacking a black woman that’s in power. You‌ all should be ashamed of ⁣yourselves.”

Now again, the​ basic idea here is that even if ‍a black person is asking this particular mayor about her corruption, it must‌ be because they’re ⁢a race traitor of some sort.

If basic standards of meritocracy and decency are to be put aside in favor of ​claims that any critique‍ is rooted in race, that means there can’t be any meritocracy ‍anymore — which, of course,​ is the basic idea that⁣ social justice can only be established by getting rid of baseline standards of competency.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

We see this‌ across the ⁣board in the United States in a ​wide variety of places. Mayor Brandon⁢ Johnson of Chicago ‍was questioned over his handling of the huge migrant crisis⁤ that ⁢has hit the city of Chicago, along with the crime crisis, along with the issues of economic problems‌ in the city. His answer was, I’m a black ⁢man with a​ black ‌wife and black kids. How dare you attack me?

This mentality is horrifyingly bad for the country. What does the race‍ of his wife and his children have​ to do with anything? The reasoning is:⁣ You can’t critique me because I am citing my race.

He’s following‌ in ‌the footsteps of Lori Lightfoot, who was recently ousted as mayor of Chicago after one short term because she was a terrible mayor. But‌ she also happened to be a black lesbian. She claimed that she had been ousted, not because she⁢ was⁢ terrible at her job, but because she was black. ​When asked after the election ⁣if she lost because of her race in a city like​ Chicago, which is heavily minority, ‌she​ said, “I’m ‌a black woman in America.”

In 2023, Lightfoot said in an interview with the New Yorker prior to the election, “And, look, also, I am‍ a Black woman —⁣ let’s not ⁣forget … Certain folks, frankly, don’t support us in leadership roles. … The same forces that didn’t want Harold Washington to succeed, they’re still here.”

She was ​referring to Chicago’s first black mayor.

This sort of excuse-making is a way of lowering standards of performance for⁢ everyone.

Again, we see it across ​the board. Fani Willis, who’s‌ the D.A. currently going after Donald ⁤Trump in Georgia, has spoken of how racism was behind all the accusations targeting her.

The answer to every question about​ impropriety is now race in America. So long as ‍you are able to play that card — and it’s a dangerous card to play — it undermines standards of⁢ stability,‍ decency, and performance in literally every industry.

How does using‍ race as⁢ a shield ⁤prevent⁢ meaningful examination of​ an individual’s conduct and create a double standard that erodes trust⁢ in⁤ institutions

E leader, but criticized anyone who questioned her performance as being racist or sexist.

In our ‌⁤current climate, it has⁤ become commonplace to use one’s race or ⁢intersectionality as a shield⁢ against ⁢criticism and accountability.​ This dangerous trend undermines the principles of equality and fairness that our society strives for.

It is crucial ‌to acknowledge that ‌racism and discrimination still exist and⁣ that marginalized communities ⁤face unique challenges. However, using these legitimate concerns⁤ as an excuse to evade responsibility or ⁣avoid‍ examination ‍of one’s actions sets a dangerous precedent.

A truly egalitarian society should be able ‌to hold all individuals, regardless of their race or⁢ intersectional identity,⁣ accountable for their actions. When the defense of “you’re attacking me because I’m black” becomes a get-out-of-jail-free ⁤card, ⁤it erodes the foundations of justice and ‌undermines the progress we have made towards a fair ​and equal society.

The ‌case of Tiffany Henyard, the mayor of Dolton, Illinois, is ‍a prime example​ of how this defense is employed to shield ‍individuals from scrutiny. ‍Despite allegations of corruption and excessive ⁤spending, ⁤Henyard dismisses any criticism as ⁤attacks on her as a black ‌woman in power.

By resorting to‌ race as a shield, Henyard undermines the⁤ valid concerns about her actions ​and prevents any meaningful examination of her conduct. This ⁢not only disrespects the ⁤importance ⁢of transparency‍ and accountability in public office but also perpetuates the notion that minority individuals are‍ beyond reproach.

This pattern ⁣of using race as a shield is not limited to ⁢a few isolated​ incidents. We have witnessed it at all levels of government, in the business world, and even in⁢ academia. When individuals in positions of power ⁢can avoid scrutiny simply ⁤by ⁢claiming racism, it creates a ⁢double standard that erodes trust ⁣in our institutions.

Moving ‍forward, ⁣it is crucial for our society​ to navigate the complex intersection of race and ‌accountability. We must find a balance​ between‌ acknowledging the systemic barriers that marginalized communities face and holding ‍individuals accountable for ‌their​ actions,​ regardless of their race or intersectional identity.

It is imperative that we foster a culture that values transparency, integrity, and equal‌ treatment ‌under ⁤the ⁤law. Only by upholding these principles can we ensure a fair⁤ and just society for all ⁣members, irrespective of⁢ their racial or intersectional background.

Addressing racial disparities and‍ working towards equity does not mean granting immunity to ⁣individuals based on their race or‌ intersectional identity. Instead, it ‌requires acknowledging⁣ the complexity of these issues while still maintaining the⁣ fundamental principles of accountability and responsibility.

As we continue to strive⁤ for ​a more inclusive and just ‍society, it is vital‍ that we reject the notion ‌that race can be used as a shield to evade scrutiny or ⁣evade responsibility. Only by⁣ holding all individuals, irrespective of their race or intersectional identity, ⁣to the same standards of accountability, can we⁤ truly achieve⁤ equality and justice.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker