The daily wire

Supreme Court denies Texas’ right to defend borders

The Right of Self-Defense ​Under Attack: Supreme Court Ruling Signals Troubling Trend

It’s no secret that the right of self-defense,⁣ one ‌of our most fundamental rights,​ is under threat in major cities across⁣ the​ country. Recent high-profile cases, such as those of Kyle Rittenhouse and the McCloskeys, ⁣have⁤ made it clear that defending yourself can lead to your life being destroyed ​by ⁤the government.

What many people may not realize is that conservatives are now inadvertently aiding the left in neutralizing this right. The ⁣recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, with two supposedly conservative justices in the majority, has given the Biden administration the green light ⁣to terminate the right of self-defense along the ⁢southern border with Mexico. ​This ruling is a significant blow to our ability​ to protect ourselves and our property, ⁣and it’s happening under ⁤the watch of the ⁣so-called “conservative majority” on the Supreme Court.

In this ruling, the Supreme Court allowed the Biden administration to remove razor-wire fencing placed by Texas on private⁤ property, with the consent‍ of ⁢the property owners, in order to prevent illegal migrants from flooding across the border. This decision is a direct‌ attack on​ the right of self-defense, as it undermines ​our ‌ability⁤ to secure our borders and protect ourselves⁢ from potential threats.

Supreme Court’s Troubling Silence

What’s particularly concerning about this ruling is the lack of explanation from the Supreme Court. There⁤ was no majority opinion provided to justify the decision. However, looking at the lower court filings, it becomes⁣ clear that the Biden administration argued that the razor-wire ‌fencing endangered‍ the lives of foreign criminals attempting to enter ​the​ country. This argument is absurd and raises the question⁤ of why we should be obligated to provide “emergency aid” to those who are breaking our laws.

The Supreme⁣ Court’s ⁢decision to side with the Biden administration ​in this case is a clear violation of the right of self-defense. It‍ suggests that we ⁢have⁢ an obligation to protect foreign criminals from themselves, rather than the right to ‌protect ourselves ​from potential threats. This is a dangerous precedent that undermines the very foundation of ⁢our self-defense rights.

Conservative Justices’ Surprising Votes

The ‌fact that supposedly conservative justices, such as Amy Coney Barrett and⁢ John Roberts, voted in favor ​of ‌this ruling is‍ deeply​ concerning. It raises questions about their commitment to conservative principles and the protection of our constitutional rights. ​Barrett, in particular, has‍ shown‍ a pattern of siding with liberal justices on key issues, undermining the trust placed in her as a conservative justice.

While this case is⁢ still making its way through the court system, it’s clear that the Supreme Court’s ruling is a significant blow to our right to defend ourselves and our borders. It’s crucial for red state governors to stand up against these​ attacks on‍ our rights and protect their‍ citizens and the border, even if it means defying the Supreme Court. When one side disregards⁤ laws and borders, it releases others ⁣from their obligations to obey the federal court system. We ‌must be prepared⁤ to defend our rights and our country, even if it means facing⁢ potential conflicts.

The last Civil War taught us⁤ that unimaginable conflicts can become a reality. If⁤ the ⁢Biden administration remains in‌ power after the next⁤ election, we may find ourselves facing a similar situation. It’s up to us to protect our rights and ensure that our⁤ government upholds its responsibility to defend our borders and ​enforce our laws.

How does ⁤this ruling potentially ​impact our right to self-defense, and what are the dangers it​ poses for ​our ability to protect ⁢ourselves and our property within ​our own communities?

Aking our laws‌ and endangering our communities.

Another troubling aspect of ⁣this ruling is the ‌fact ‍that ‌Justices Brett Kavanaugh and ‌Amy Coney ‍Barrett, both of whom ‌were appointed by former President Trump‌ and‌ are‌ considered to be conservative ​justices,​ sided with ​the liberal justices in​ allowing the removal of the razor-wire fencing. This raises concerns about the ⁢reliability of so-called conservative justices and their commitment ‌to⁤ protecting our fundamental rights.

Implications for Self-Defense

The implications of‍ this ruling ​on ‌the ⁣right of self-defense are significant. If the‍ government can justify the removal ‍of protective measures intended to secure our borders ​and ‌keep us safe, what’s ⁢to stop them from limiting our ​ability to defend ourselves and our property within⁣ our own communities? ​This ruling sets a dangerous precedent⁣ and could pave the ​way⁤ for further erosion of our right ‍to self-defense.

Furthermore, it sends a message that criminals and illegal migrants have greater rights and protections than law-abiding citizens. Instead of prioritizing the safety and ⁢security of American citizens, this ruling prioritizes the interests of those⁤ who break our ​laws and seek to harm our communities.

Fighting for Our Rights

It is crucial⁢ that ⁣we recognize the threat that this ruling and⁢ others like ​it⁢ pose ⁣to our fundamental rights. We cannot rely solely on the Supreme Court to protect our ⁣right of self-defense; it ​is ‍up⁤ to us‍ as⁢ citizens ⁢to hold our elected officials accountable and demand that our ​rights are safeguarded. We must support organizations and ⁤individuals who fight for the preservation of‍ our rights⁢ and oppose​ any attempts to erode them.

Additionally, ‍we ⁤must continue to educate ourselves and others about the‍ importance of the right of self-defense. By understanding the ​historical and philosophical foundations of this ⁣right, we​ can effectively ​advocate​ for its preservation and​ push back ​against attempts to weaken or eliminate it.

Conclusion

The recent ruling‌ by the‍ U.S. Supreme Court regarding the removal of razor-wire ‌fencing on the southern border signals a troubling trend in the erosion of our right of self-defense. This decision undermines our ability to​ protect ourselves and our property, and raises ⁢questions about the⁣ reliability of conservative justices in safeguarding our fundamental ⁤rights. It is⁢ imperative that we remain vigilant, fight for our‍ rights, and‍ educate ‍others about the importance of self-defense in maintaining a free and secure​ society.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker