Washington Examiner

White House avoids discussing McCarthy’s hot seat.

The White ‍House Keeps a Close Eye on House ⁤Speaker Replacement‌ Campaign

The White House is closely monitoring the campaign to replace ‍House ‍Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) but​ is refraining from getting involved in ⁢the brewing ⁢fight‍ within the Republican caucus.

After successfully working with Democrats to pass ⁢a continuing resolution that funds the government ⁤for ⁤the next 45 days, McCarthy now faces a motion to vacate ⁤the speakership introduced ⁢by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) on Monday night. This motion could potentially reach the floor later this week.

Opposing Views on Ukraine ​Funding

Gaetz and other members of the Freedom Caucus strongly oppose providing Ukraine with additional funding to repel Russian invaders, viewing it as a “blank check.” On ⁣the other hand, McCarthy has ⁤been a ‍vocal supporter of the Biden administration’s Ukraine policy.

The White House’s ⁤Stance

During Monday’s press briefing, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre faced numerous questions regarding ⁣Gaetz’s threat. However, she consistently‍ emphasized that ‌the president is not taking ​sides⁣ in ​this ⁤feud.

“He does not have a vote‍ on this matter. It is something for House Republicans to decide,” she⁤ stated. “That is something we ‍do not get involved in when it comes‍ to ​the leadership⁢ conversation. That is something ⁤for House Democrats, House Republicans ​in ⁤this particular instance, to decide.”

Alleged Back-Channel Deal

On Monday, ‌Gaetz claimed that McCarthy​ and⁤ Biden‌ had made a back-channel deal to bring new aid to Ukraine for a vote. ⁤Despite specific⁤ requests from the White⁣ House, the continuing resolution⁢ and previous iterations proposed by⁣ Republicans did ⁢not include additional​ funding for Ukraine. The president had suggested on Sunday that he and McCarthy had reached an agreement on Ukraine⁣ before he signed the stopgap funding resolution.

However, Jean-Pierre avoided addressing the alleged deal directly and declined to confirm the accuracy of the president’s ⁣remarks.

Democrats ​See an Advantage

While ⁣the White House is unlikely to intervene in McCarthy’s hold over⁣ the⁤ House caucus, national Democrats view the situation​ as beneficial heading into an election year.

“What’s on display right now is⁢ just the quintessential‍ shit show that is the House Republican caucus. Every day they ⁤show to the American people why they can’t govern,⁤ and it’s been pretty consistent for ⁤10 months,” a senior Democratic official ‌told the Washington Examiner.

“I ‍think ​it‌ helps us. It helps us make the argument we are making about the Republican Party right now, which is that they are beholden to⁣ Donald Trump and that they are much ⁢more concerned with the issues that are​ on Fox News on any given day than governing,” the official continued. “That is a big part of the argument that we are making ‌against the Republican Party writ large,​ and then we just have so much‌ evidence that ⁣they give us every single day to further advance our argument. ⁢So yeah, it helps us to remind the American people‌ of the issues in the Republican Party and ‌how extreme they are.”

Surprisingly, ⁢a senior Republican congressional aide agreed with this sentiment.

“We’ve got⁢ members more concerned with booking themselves on Fox or Newsmax than working as a group to actually ⁤bring down ​spending, and the American public is going ⁣to be⁢ the ⁣one paying the cost,” the aide told the Washington Examiner. “It⁤ gives ‍Democrats that much​ more ammo, not only in the presidential election but here on the Hill too. What ⁤are those ​people going to say when we get stuck ⁤with four more years of Biden and⁢ a new Democrat majority ⁢in the House? It’s ‌embarrassing, to be ⁢honest.”

Democrats’⁤ Response to Gaetz’s Threat

Over ⁢the weekend, national Democrats avoided addressing Gaetz’s long-standing threat against McCarthy.

House⁣ Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries ⁤(D-NY) evaded ‍the question before the passage of the 45-day⁢ continuing resolution.

“We⁢ haven’t given any thought to how to‍ handle a hypothetical motion to ⁢vacate,” he told reporters. “We⁣ are⁤ entirely focused on making sure that we avoid this ​extreme MAGA‌ Republican ⁤shutdown.”

A motion to vacate would require a majority floor vote of 218 “ayes” to pass. Since the‌ anti-McCarthy faction only ​has around 20 members at best, Gaetz and his supporters ‌would need the majority of Democrats to oust the​ speaker.

2) What are ⁤some potential candidates to ⁢replace Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker?

N Post. “This infighting ⁣gives us an advantage as we head into the midterm elections.”

The ‌Future of‍ the House ⁢​Speaker

Should McCarthy be ousted ‌as ‌House⁣ ‌Speaker, potential‌ candidates to ‍replace him include Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Rep. Elise Stefanik⁣ (R-NY), ‌and Rep. Steve‍ Scalise (R-LA).

Jordan, a founding member of the Freedom Caucus, would likely bring a more conservative agenda to‌ the speakership. Stefanik, who gained prominence for her defense ⁣of former President Donald Trump during his first impeachment trial, could offer a fresh, younger perspective. Scalise, currently the House ⁤Minority Whip, has​ strong support within the caucus and could potentially ‌maintain the status quo.

Conclusion

The White House is ⁢closely observing the campaign‍ to replace House Speaker Kevin‍ McCarthy as tensions rise within the Republican caucus. Despite ⁢differing views on Ukraine funding between McCarthy and Rep. Matt Gaetz, ​the White House has chosen to stay‌ out of the internal disagreement.‌ Allegations of a back-channel deal between McCarthy‍ and President Biden‍ have surfaced, however, the White House has not clarified the situation. Democrats see the infighting within the Republican caucus as an advantage ⁣heading into the midterm elections. As the potential replacement for McCarthy is considered, candidates ‌such as ​Jim Jordan, Elise ‍Stefanik,⁢ and Steve Scalise‌ are seen as strong contenders. The future of the House Speaker remains uncertain, and the White House will continue to⁢ monitor ​developments closely.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker