These Mosques Pray for the Annihilation of Jews. They Also Receive Money From the Biden Administration.
Federal Program Funds Mosques and Islamic Groups with Controversial Views
A federal program aimed at protecting nonprofit groups from terrorist attacks has come under scrutiny for providing millions of dollars to mosques and Islamic organizations that have expressed support for terrorists and advocated for the destruction of Israel, according to an investigation by the Washington Free Beacon.
Mosques with Troubling Rhetoric
- The Masjid al-Ansar mosque in California received $100,000 in funding, despite its imam, Moustafa Kamel, making anti-Semitic remarks and praying for the annihilation of Jews in a war over the Holy Land.
- The Islamic Center of Detroit, which received $150,000, has an imam, Imran Salha, who openly expressed a desire to burn the state of Israel and referred to it as a “sick, disgusting Zionist regime.”
- The Islamic Center of San Diego, known for being associated with the 9/11 hijackers, received $150,000. Its imam, Taha Hassane, defended Hamas’s attack on Israel as an act of self-defense.
- The Flint Islamic Center, which received $300,000, had an Islamic scholar, Shaykh Adbullah Waheed, who claimed that Jews live for the purpose of genocide against Palestinians.
The alarming rhetoric from these organizations raises concerns about the potential for hate crimes and terrorist attacks, which the Department of Homeland Security grants aim to prevent. In fact, anti-Semitic hate crimes have surged by 400 percent since the recent Hamas attack, resulting in the deaths of 1,400 Israelis.
While the majority of grants have been awarded to synagogues, churches, mosques, and temples that do not support violence or promote terrorism, there is limited oversight over the selection process. This lack of scrutiny has allowed controversial organizations to receive funding, such as the Dar al-Hijrah mosque, which has ties to Al-Qaeda recruiters.
Controversial Organizations and Advocacy Groups
- The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), identified as a co-conspirator of Hamas, has received grants and blamed Israel for the root causes of the recent Hamas attack.
- The Muslim American Society’s Chicago affiliate, founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, regularly hosts anti-Semitic speakers and is set to feature Yasir Qadhi, who has made controversial statements about Hitler and the Jews, at its upcoming convention.
- The Islamic Organization of North America, which received $450,000, had its head imam speak at a rally where he accused the Israeli government of slaughtering Palestinians. The event was emceed by Amer Zahr, an activist who openly supports resistance against Israel, including groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
- ICNA Relief USA, another grant recipient, has a religious director, Rafiq Mahdi, who has expressed support for Hamas and struggled to condemn suicide bombers.
Despite concerns about the potential influence of these grants on organizations with controversial views, the Department of Homeland Security has not provided any comment or explanation regarding its selection process.
How do the controversial views expressed by these mosques and Islamic organizations raise concerns about the allocation of federal funds?
Ric and views expressed by these mosques and Islamic organizations raise concerns about the allocation of federal funds. The purpose of this federal program is to protect nonprofit organizations from terrorist attacks, but it is disconcerting to see funds being allocated to groups with controversial views that go against the values of inclusivity and peaceful coexistence.
The revelations uncovered by the investigation conducted by the Washington Free Beacon shed light on the troubling rhetoric propagated by these mosques and organizations. The Masjid al-Ansar mosque in California, for instance, received $100,000 in funding despite its imam, Moustafa Kamel, making anti-Semitic remarks and even praying for the annihilation of Jews in a war over the Holy Land. Such hateful and inflammatory rhetoric should raise red flags and prompt a reassessment of the funding allocation process.
Similarly, the Islamic Center of Detroit, which received $150,000, has an imam named Imran Salha who openly expressed a desire to burn the state of Israel, referring to it as a “sick, disgusting Zionist regime.” A religious leader espousing such extreme and violent views is troubling, and it raises questions about the vetting process for funding recipients.
Moreover, the Islamic Center of San Diego, which is known for its associations with the 9/11 hijackers, received $150,000. Its imam, Taha Hassane, defended Hamas’s attack on Israel as an act of self-defense. This endorsement of violence undermines the values of peace and non-violence that the federal program aims to promote. Supporting organizations with ties to extremism not only compromises the effectiveness of the program but also sends the wrong message to the public.
The Flint Islamic Center also received a significant sum of $300,000. However, it is concerning to discover that one of their Islamic scholars, Shaykh Abdullah Waheed, claimed that Jews live for the purpose of genocide against Palestinians. Such discriminatory and baseless accusations do not align with the principles of peace, respect, and inclusivity that should guide the federal program’s funding decisions.
Given these revelations, it is imperative that the federal program responsible for allocating funds to nonprofit organizations reassess its vetting process. Funding should be directed towards organizations that uphold and promote values of inclusivity, tolerance, and peaceful coexistence. While freedom of religion is a fundamental right, it is crucial to separate the protection of religious freedom from the support of extremist ideologies or groups.
Moreover, transparency and accountability should be prioritized in the allocation of federal funds. Clear guidelines and criteria should be established to ensure that organizations receiving funding are thoroughly evaluated to prevent funds from reaching those with controversial views or ties to extremism.
In conclusion, the allocation of federal funds to mosques and Islamic organizations with controversial views and ties to extremism raises significant concerns. The federal program aimed at protecting nonprofit organizations from terrorist attacks must reassess its vetting process and ensure that funding is channeled towards organizations that uphold values of inclusivity, peace, and respect. Transparency, accountability, and a thorough evaluation process are essential to prevent the misuse of funds and to promote a society that embraces diversity and harmony.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...