British hospitals claim that milk from men is just as beneficial for babies as mothers’ breast milk, calling it “sick
British Trust Claims Milk from Biological Men is as Good as Breast Milk for Babies
In a controversial move, a British trust overseeing multiple hospitals has sparked a heated debate by asserting that milk produced by biological men, with the help of ingested hormones, is just as beneficial for babies as breast milk from their mothers.
Dr. Rachael James, the medical director of the University of Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust (USHT), known for its progressive stance on gender terminology, wrote a letter last August to an organization called Children of Transitioners. In the letter, she argued that the term “human milk” should be considered neutral and not gender-biased, as it is the ideal food for infants.
Dr. James further explained that medications can be used to induce lactation in biological men, similar to the natural hormones that stimulate lactation after childbirth. She claimed that the available evidence demonstrates that the milk produced in this way is comparable to that produced by mothers after giving birth.
The USHT cited a 2022 study that measured “infant milk testosterone concentrations” and found no observable side effects on babies fed milk from biological men or lactating transgender women. However, this study has reportedly been rejected by experts, as reported by The Daily Mail.
In 2021, USHT introduced Great Britain’s first clinical and language guidelines supporting trans and non-binary birthing individuals. These guidelines asserted that men who had taken hormones could produce milk comparable to that produced after childbirth.
Critics, such as Lottie Moore from Policy Exchange, argue that the trust’s claims are unbalanced and naive. They believe that the secretions produced by males on hormones cannot nourish infants in the same way as a mother’s breast milk. They emphasize that a child’s welfare should always take precedence over identity politics and beliefs that lack evidence-based support.
Despite the controversy, a spokesperson for USHT has stated that they stand by the facts presented in the letter and the evidence supporting them.
This is what this madness has wrought folks. Being “pc”/polite/saying nothing when you know it’s wrong has gotten us to abusing babies. Pls pls pls find your voice. This is sick. It’s mental illness – and we are enabling it. https://t.co/voY6BiKaBR
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) February 18, 2024
How does hormone therapy enable men to produce milk that is nutritionally comparable to breast milk?
Which allows them to produce milk that is nutritionally similar to breast milk. She pointed out that breast milk from biological women contains unique components that are important for infant development, such as antibodies and specific types of fats. However, she argued that with the help of hormone therapy, men can produce milk that is comparable in nutritional value for babies.
The controversial claim made by Dr. James has ignited a fierce debate among medical professionals and the general public. Opponents argue that breast milk from biological women is irreplaceable and contains elements that cannot be replicated in milk produced by men. They stress the importance of breastfeeding for establishing a strong bond between mother and child, and believe that this bond is not only nourishing but also emotionally beneficial.
On the other hand, supporters of Dr. James’ claim believe that it is crucial to be inclusive and considerate of various family structures and circumstances. They argue that not all babies have access to breast milk from their biological mothers and that alternative options should be explored to ensure optimal nutrition for infants. They also emphasize the significant advances in hormone therapy and the potential it holds for allowing men to contribute to infant feeding.
The British trust’s viewpoint is in line with the broader movement towards gender inclusivity. It challenges traditional gender roles and encourages a more expansive understanding of parenthood and infant feeding. However, it is important to note that the scientific consensus on this matter is not yet established. There is limited research on the nutritional composition and long-term effects of milk produced by biological men.
Critics argue that the potential risks and uncertainties associated with consuming milk from biological men should be thoroughly studied before any widespread adoption of this practice. They highlight the importance of evidence-based medicine and caution against potentially harmful consequences that may arise from hasty decisions.
In conclusion, the assertion by the University of Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust that milk from biological men can be as good as breast milk for babies has sparked a contentious debate. While some argue for the importance of breastfeeding and its irreplaceable benefits, others advocate for inclusivity and alternative options. However, further research is needed to ascertain the nutritional composition and long-term effects of milk produced by biological men. Only with a robust scientific foundation can informed decisions be made regarding infant nutrition and feeding practices.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...