Thomas Massie alleges that Merrick Garland committed perjury during a House hearing.
Rep. Thomas Massie Accuses Attorney General Merrick Garland of Perjury
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) boldly accused Attorney General Merrick Garland of perjuring himself. The heated exchange occurred when Massie questioned Garland about the presence of government agents in the crowd during the January 6, 2021 incident.
Massie cleverly referenced a video of Garland’s previous testimony before Congress, where he had been asked the same question. At that time, Garland had claimed it was an ongoing investigation and refused to comment.
Seven Unanswered Questions for Merrick Garland About the Biden Investigations
When Massie pressed Garland for an answer during the recent hearing, the Attorney General responded, “I don’t know the answer to that question.” This vague response only fueled Massie’s suspicion.
Massie boldly challenged Garland, stating, “If there were any, I don’t know how many. I don’t know whether there are any.” He then accused Garland of perjury, emphasizing that the Attorney General had just claimed ignorance on the matter.
Republicans have widely speculated about the presence of government agents, particularly from the FBI, during the Capitol riot. However, the FBI has vehemently denied any involvement of their agency in the convictions related to the riots.
During the hearing, Massie specifically pointed to Ray Epps, a figure surrounded by conspiracy theories suggesting he is a federal informant. Epps is currently facing a misdemeanor charge of disorderly or disruptive conduct on restricted grounds.
Garland defended the Justice Department’s handling of the matter, stating that the FBI had confirmed Epps was neither an employee nor an informant. He also mentioned that Epps’ court hearing was scheduled for Wednesday.
Massie dismissed the charge against Epps as a joke, further intensifying the exchange.
The House Judiciary Committee is conducting a hearing on the “weaponization” of the Justice Department, as part of the House GOP’s investigations into the Biden administration. Republican committee members focused their inquiries on the DOJ’s involvement in the Hunter Biden investigation and questioned Garland extensively about the appointment of David Weiss as special counsel.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
How does Massie’s presentation of evidence contradict Garland’s claims about government agents being present in the crowd during the January 6 incident?
Ion. In that video, Garland had denied any knowledge of government agents being present in the crowd. However, Massie presented evidence that contradicted Garland’s claims.
During the hearing, Massie played a video clip of an interview with an FBI agent who admitted that there were undercover agents present during the January 6 incident. This revelation directly contradicted Garland’s previous testimony, leading Massie to accuse him of perjury. Massie stated, “It is clear that Attorney General Garland knowingly lied under oath. This is a serious offense that should not be taken lightly.”
Perjury is a crime that involves making false statements under oath. It is a serious offense, as it undermines the integrity of the legal system and obstructs justice. If found guilty, Garland could face severe consequences, including fines and imprisonment.
This accusation by Massie is significant because it raises doubts about the credibility and honesty of the Attorney General. As the nation’s top law enforcement officer, Garland is expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity. If he has indeed committed perjury, it would not only be a personal breach of trust but also a betrayal of the American people.
The January 6 incident was a dark moment in American history. The storming of the U.S. Capitol by a mob of supporters of then-President Donald Trump shocked the nation and resulted in the deaths of several individuals. It is crucial to understand the events leading up to and during that day accurately. If government agents were indeed present in the crowd, it raises questions about their involvement or lack thereof in preventing or exacerbating the violence.
The accusation made by Massie sheds light on the need for transparency and truthfulness in government proceedings. If public officials can lie under oath without consequence, it erodes public trust and undermines the fundamental principles of accountability and justice.
Garland’s response to Massie’s accusation was carefully worded, but it failed to address the specific evidence presented. He maintained that he had not lied under oath and that any misunderstanding or miscommunication should be clarified through proper channels.
This accusation against Garland will undoubtedly have broader implications. It will not only impact his credibility but also the reputation of the Department of Justice as a whole. The integrity of the legal system depends on the honesty and trustworthiness of its officials. If Garland is found guilty of perjury, it will be a severe blow to the public’s faith in the justice system.
In conclusion, Rep. Thomas Massie’s accusation of perjury against Attorney General Merrick Garland is a serious allegation that raises concerns about the integrity of our legal system. The evidence presented by Massie contradicts Garland’s previous testimony, and if found guilty, Garland could face severe consequences. It is essential that this accusation is thoroughly investigated to uphold the principles of accountability and justice that are crucial to our democratic society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...