Tim Scott Schools NBC News’ Lester Holt Over Fact Check On Plan To Lower Prices
Sen. Tim Scott Disputes Fact Check During Republican Presidential Debate
During Wednesday night’s third Republican presidential debate in Miami, Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) engaged in a lively exchange with NBC News co-moderator Lester Holt. Holt had questioned Scott about his plans to lower prices for everyday items that burden American families.
Scott confidently responded, “America is blessed with an abundance of energy resources. By focusing on my ‘build here, don’t borrow from China’ plan, we can reduce the cost of energy, food, and electricity. This made in America strategy will create 10 million new jobs in innovation, high tech manufacturing, and the energy economy. We have the opportunity to export our surplus energy, freeing ourselves from reliance on China and oppressive regimes.”
Holt attempted to interrupt Scott, but Scott fired back, “Actually, it does make a difference. The economy operates on the principle of supply and demand. When we anticipate excess supply, prices decrease. Allowing those with leases to drill and extract more energy puts our economy in a strong position, leading to lower prices.”
WATCH:
What specific strategies did Senator Scott propose to lower prices on everyday items for American families?
During the Republican presidential debate on Wednesday night, Senator Tim Scott from South Carolina had a heated exchange with co-moderator Lester Holt from NBC News. The topic of discussion revolved around Scott’s plans to lower prices on everyday items that burden American families.
In response to Holt’s question, Scott confidently stated that America is blessed with an abundance of energy resources. He presented his “build here, don’t borrow from China” plan as a way to reduce the cost of energy, food, and electricity. According to Scott, this strategy, focused on products made in America, would result in the creation of 10 million new jobs in innovation, high-tech manufacturing, and the energy economy. Additionally, Scott emphasized the opportunity to export surplus energy and reduce reliance on China and oppressive regimes.
However, Holt attempted to interrupt Scott, challenging the feasibility of his plan. In response, Scott asserted that it indeed makes a difference. He explained that the principle of supply and demand governs the economy, and when there is an anticipated excess supply, prices decrease. Scott firmly believed that allowing those with leases to drill and extract more energy would strengthen the economy and lead to lower prices.
The exchange between Scott and Holt showcased a difference in opinion regarding economic policies and strategies. Scott’s emphasis on utilizing America’s energy resources and promoting domestic manufacturing as a means to decrease prices clashed with Holt’s concerns and skepticism.
It is important to note that this debate and the exchange between Scott and Holt highlight the ongoing conversation regarding economic strategies and their impact on the everyday lives of American families. Furthermore, it symbolizes the varying viewpoints within the Republican party regarding energy policies and their role in shaping the economy.
This lively exchange during the Republican presidential debate sheds light on the complexities of economic issues and the differing approaches taken by politicians. It serves as a reminder of the significance of these debates in shaping public opinion and influencing political discourse.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...