Tim Walz Insider Reveals JD Vance’s Debate Strategy Took Them by Surprise

Following⁢ the ‌recent vice-presidential debate between Ohio Republican Senator ​J.D. Vance and Minnesota Democrat Governor Tim Walz, many viewers perceived Vance’s performance ⁣as exceptional. Republican ​voters praised him for his ⁢calm ⁤demeanor and unexpected warmth, which contrasted with the aggressive style shown by Vice‌ President Kamala Harris in​ her recent debate against former ⁢President Donald Trump. Walz’s team had⁢ anticipated a⁣ more combative Vance, ⁣reflective of his campaign rhetoric, but were surprised⁣ by his amiability during the debate.

A ⁣Vance‌ advisor noted that their strategy aimed to challenge the ⁣media’s preconceived⁣ notions of Vance as a harsh figure. The advisor also emphasized the ⁤importance of contrasting Trump’s successes with Harris’s failures, which Vance accomplished while maintaining‍ a relatable and ​approachable persona. The visual ‌dynamics of the debate were also significant; Vance appeared relaxed and ​engaged, ‍even sharing‍ a light moment with the audience, whereas Walz displayed a more serious demeanor.

Vance’s approach may benefit Trump’s campaign indirectly by shifting perceptions and presenting ⁣a different narrative in a heated political landscape.‍ The implications of debate performances can be‍ substantial, as historical examples have ⁤shown ⁢their potential to influence voter decisions significantly.


After Tuesday’s vice-presidential debate between Ohio Republican Sen. J.D. Vance and Minnesota Democrat Gov. Tim Walz, many viewers walked away with the impression that Vance put on a master class.

While Republican voters are praising Vance for appearing calm and actually nice at times, even Walz’s aides admitted the strategy was one they did not expect.

Axios reported on Thursday that an unnamed member of the Walz team said they “expected more MAGA mode, given what [Vance has] been saying repeatedly on the stump.”

The Walz campaign was clearly expecting something more like what they’ve seen in Vance’s remarks on the campaign trail and his demeanor with crowds, which have been indicative of how polarizing politics are in this election cycle.

In September, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump battled in their own CBS debate, with Trump on the offensive as he tried to remind Americans of how awful Harris’s time in office has been as President Joe Biden’s second.

Trump appeared aggressive and dismayed many by taking the bait when Harris criticized the attendance at his rallies.

Needless to say, Tuesday’s dynamic was a total reversal, courtesy of Vance.

A Vance advisor told Axios, “We figured it would throw him off,” further noting, “Democrats and much of the media bought their own false caricature of J.D., that he was just some heartless fire-breather.”

The mainstream media certainly had their preconceptions of Vance, whether it be from his “childless cat ladies” comments about who’s running the government or just by sheer association with his more combative running mate.

One advisor remarked, “J.D. knew instinctively that what would actually move the ball forward is creating the contrast between Trump’s successes and Kamala’s failures.”

While being warm and relatable, Vance still achieved that end by reminding viewers where Harris was lacking since taking office in 2021, whether it be through her terrible border policies or how much prices have risen.

Viewers also noted the difference in appearance between the two.

Vance appeared relaxed in his body language.

He even gave viewers a viral snapshot in which he broke the fourth wall, reacting with an irreverent smirk toward the TV camera as Walz spoke.

The governor, on the other hand, was panicked and wore a frown coupled with a wide-eyed glare into the camera.

Call it superficial, but all this matters.

As The Smithsonian noted, the first televised debate between Vice President Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy in 1960 had a huge impact on the outcome of the election. Four million voters made up their minds after the debate, with three million choosing Kennedy in what would be one of the closest elections in history.

Of course, Vance and Walz aren’t running for the highest office themselves, but the Ohioan’s strategy should pay off for Trump.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker