‘Too Narrow’: Jonathan Turley Rips Supreme Court For Ducking ‘Fundamental Issue’ In Censorship Case
The text snippet appears to discuss the concept of “standing”, a legal principle that determines who is entitled to bring a lawsuit to court. This is suggested via the phrase “Standing is often used to block meritorious claims”, indicating that the requirement for standing might be used strategically to prevent otherwise valid and justifiable legal claims from being heard in court. The concept of “standing” in a legal context indeed addresses whether a party has the right to make a legal claim or engage in a courtroom battle. Parties essentially need to demonstrate that they have sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action they are challenging to support that party’s participation in the case. The snippet you provided appears to argue that this criterion can be abused or misapplied, thereby serving as a gatekeeping mechanism to deny access to the courts, potentially for claims that have merit and deserve to be adjudicated. This use of “standing” might be seen as a way to unduly limit lawsuits which might otherwise lead to necessary legal reforms or enforcement of rights. This is a critical element in constitutional law, particularly in systems where judicial oversight plays a significant role in maintaining checks and balances, such as in the United States.
‘Standing is often used to block meritorious claims’
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...