Trump Appeals New York Fraud Case
OAN’s Brooke Mallory
11:16 AM – Monday, February 26, 2024
Former President Donald Trump has filed an appeal against a judge’s ruling that requires him to pay over $450 million in a civil fraud lawsuit brought by the New York attorney general against his business empire.
Judge Arthur Engoron’s ruling earlier this month dealt a severe blow to the former president, prohibiting him from holding a senior position in any New York company for three years and appointing impartial observers to monitor his businesses.
The ruling came after a lengthy trial where the judge concluded that Trump and his senior officials had colluded for years to manipulate their net worth for insurance and tax benefits.
Trump’s appeal was expected as he and his attorneys have vehemently criticized the judge’s decision, calling it politically motivated and a “manifest injustice.” Trump denies any wrongdoing.
“We trust that the Appellate Division will overturn this egregious fine and take the necessary steps to restore the public faith in New York’s legal system,” said Trump attorney Alina Habba in a statement.
After officially filing the appeal, Trump will present his case to the First Judicial Department Appellate Division in an effort to have the remaining penalties, including the massive fine, dropped.
The New York attorney general’s office declined to comment.
The appeal comes after Trump’s legal team requested a 30-day delay in enforcing the $454 million fine to “protect” his appellate rights. However, Judge Engoron denied the request last week.
“You have failed to explain, much less justify, any basis for a stay,” responded Engoron to the request. “I am confident that the Appellate Division will protect your appellate rights.”
If the astronomical charge is upheld, Trump will also have to pay additional interest, with the amount increasing daily since the judgment was filed.
New York Attorney Letitia James has been taunting the former president by sharing the updated amount on Twitter every day.
While the ruling does not force Trump to leave his company, it could lead to significant organizational changes and the business operating without a clear leader for the first time.
In addition to the sanctions against Trump, his two adult sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., have been barred from holding executive positions in New York companies for two years.
The judge also imposed fines on Trump’s sons and senior business officials and expanded the authority of an impartial monitor to oversee the finances of the Trump Organization.
Stay informed! Subscribe here to receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. https://www.oann.com/alerts
with Drew Hernandez
with Kari Lake
with Roman Sharf
with Michael Loftus
Microsoft announced principles to foster innovation and competition as a market leader in AI.
Google plans to relaunch its AI tool that creates images of people in the next few weeks.
Nvidia’s market value soared to $2 trillion after surpassing Wall Street’s high expectations for AI chip demand.
Apple is rolling out an upgrade to its iMessage texting platform to protect against future encryption-breaking technologies.
rnrn
What are Trump’s arguments in his appeal against the ruling, and what are the potential implications if the appeal fails?
S pose a significant financial burden on Trump and his businesses, it also raises broader questions about the accountability of public officials and the integrity of the legal system.
The civil fraud lawsuit was brought by the New York attorney general’s office, accusing Trump and his senior officials of manipulating their net worth for insurance and tax benefits. The judge’s ruling not only requires Trump to pay a staggering $450 million fine but also prohibits him from holding a senior position in any New York company for three years. In addition, impartial observers will be appointed to monitor his businesses.
Unsurprisingly, Trump has filed an appeal against this ruling, arguing that it is politically motivated and a manifestation of injustice. His attorneys have vehemently criticized the judge’s decision and expressed confidence in overturning the fine on appeal. Trump himself maintains his innocence and denies any wrongdoing.
Trump’s appeal will be presented to the First Judicial Department Appellate Division, where he hopes to have the remaining penalties, including the hefty fine, dropped. His legal team had previously requested a 30-day delay in enforcing the fine to protect his appellate rights. However, this request was denied by Judge Engoron, who expressed confidence in the Appellate Division’s protection of Trump’s appellate rights.
If the appeal fails and the astronomical charge is upheld, Trump will also be required to pay additional interest on the fine, which increases daily since the judgment was filed. The financial implications for Trump and his businesses cannot be understated.
Furthermore, this case raises larger implications about the accountability of public officials and the integrity of the legal system. Regardless of one’s political beliefs or support for Trump, it is imperative for the legal system to operate without political bias or favoritism. The judicial system should be a neutral arbiter, ensuring justice and fairness for all parties involved.
While the New York attorney general’s office has declined to comment on the appeal, it is evident that this ongoing legal battle will have significant ramifications on Trump’s financial standing and his future business endeavors. Additionally, the outcome of the appeal will shape public perception of the legal system’s ability to hold public officials accountable.
As the legal proceedings continue, it is crucial to maintain a fair and impartial approach and let the judicial process run its course. Regardless of the final outcome, this case serves as a reminder that public officials should be held to the highest standard of accountability and that the integrity of the legal system should never be compromised.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...