Trump campaign criticizes DeSantis as ‘eager’ before Newsom debate

Trump’s Campaign Mocks DeSantis Ahead of Debate with Newsom

Former President Donald Trump’s 2024 election campaign launched a scathing attack on Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) ahead of his ​debate against Gov. Gavin ‌Newsom (D-CA),‌ referring to him as a “thirsty, third-rate⁢ OnlyFans wannabe model.”

“Ron DeSanctimonious is acting more like a thirsty, third-rate OnlyFans wannabe model than an actual presidential candidate,” said Steven Cheung, a Trump spokesman, in a statement. “Instead of actually⁢ campaigning and trying ⁢to turn around his dismal poll numbers, DeSanctus is now so desperate for attention ‍that he’s debating a Grade ​A loser like Gavin Newsom.”

DeSantis Takes a Risky⁢ Move in ‍Debate Against​ Newsom

DeSantis ‌is set to ⁣face off against​ Newsom ⁣at 9 ‌p.m. Eastern ⁢on Fox‍ News, with Sean Hannity moderating the debate. This unconventional debate provides‌ the Florida governor an opportunity to present his case to a receptive audience, outside of the Republican National Committee-sanctioned primary debates.

Unlike Trump, ⁢DeSantis has already participated in all three previous GOP primary debates. However, his decision to debate Newsom suggests a​ desire for additional media attention, as Newsom is a ‍rising star in the Democratic Party. Nevertheless, Trump’s campaign has been mocking the debate due to‍ DeSantis’s declining poll numbers and internal struggles ​with his affiliated⁣ super PAC, Never Back Down.

“At the debate, Ron will flail his arms and ⁢bobble ⁣his head ⁣wildly, looking ‌more like a⁢ San Francisco crackhead than the governor of Florida. This isn’t a prediction. It’s a spoiler,” Cheung continued. “Hopefully for Ron, it’s⁤ a seated debate so he⁢ won’t​ have to ​mash his foot into his high-heels to look taller. But if not, he’ll definitely be⁣ on a 12-inch ‌step stool so ‌he ​can⁣ peek right above the podium.”

Cheung’s ⁤comments⁣ allude to allegations‍ that DeSantis has been wearing‌ height-enhancing cowboy boots during his campaign.

Click‌ here to read more from The Washington Examiner.

Trump currently holds a significant‍ lead over his rivals in national surveys. According to a RealClearPolitics poll average, Trump stands at 62%, while DeSantis trails at 13.6%, ⁤and⁣ former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley at 9.6%. ‍The debate with​ Newsom takes place less than seven weeks before the Jan. 15 Iowa caucuses, which DeSantis hopes⁢ to win in order to impede Trump’s path to the nomination.

DeSantis has secured the coveted ⁢endorsement of Gov. Kim​ Reynolds (R-IA) and ​influential​ evangelical Iowa⁤ leader Bob ⁣Vander Plaats. However, a strong debate performance against‍ Newsom could further boost DeSantis’s campaign leading up to the fourth GOP debate⁤ in​ Alabama‌ next week.

How does the format ⁤of the debate contribute to ‌the potential for more heated exchanges and personal attacks between ‍the candidates?

Format allows for more direct interaction between the candidates, which could potentially lead to more ‍heated⁤ exchanges and opportunities for personal attacks.

By choosing to debate Newsom,⁣ DeSantis is taking a risky move, as Newsom enjoys a higher ⁣popularity rating and has a strong​ base of support in California. ‍However, DeSantis seems ​to be banking on the fact that his conservative stance and ⁣policies will resonate with the Republican ⁣base ⁤across the country,⁢ and this ⁤debate is an opportunity for him to showcase his⁢ ideology and gain national exposure.

The Trump campaign’s attack on DeSantis reflects the growing divide within ⁢the Republican Party. While DeSantis is often seen as a⁢ potential successor to Trump and has closely aligned himself with the former ‍president’s policies, the Trump campaign’s mockery suggests a rift in their ‍relationship. It highlights the intense competition‌ among Republican candidates vying for‌ Trump’s endorsement and support in the upcoming ⁢2024 election.

This⁣ attack also raises questions about the ⁣tone and‌ direction of political discourse in the United States. Personal attacks and⁤ name-calling have become⁢ all too common in politics, and the ⁢Trump ‍campaign’s choice of words further perpetuates this trend. ‌Instead⁣ of focusing on the issues⁣ and presenting substantive arguments, political campaigns often resort ‌to mudslinging and⁢ ad hominem ⁢attacks in an attempt‌ to discredit their opponents.

While such tactics‍ may‌ temporarily grab attention and generate buzz, they contribute to​ the ⁤polarization and fragmentation of American politics. They divert attention from the important‌ policy debates and hinder the ability ⁤to find common ⁤ground ⁤and ⁢solutions to pressing issues.

As the debate between DeSantis and Newsom approaches, it ‌is ⁤crucial for ​voters ⁤to look beyond the rhetoric and personal attacks. They should evaluate each⁤ candidate’s​ positions, track record, and ability to address the challenges facing their respective states and the nation as a whole.

Ultimately, the debates ⁤should​ serve ​as ‌an opportunity for candidates to present their vision ‌and plans for the future, rather than engaging ​in petty‍ insults and derogatory language. The American public deserves ‌a substantive and respectful discourse that focuses on the issues that truly matter to them.

It remains to be seen how DeSantis⁤ will fare in ⁤the debate and whether ‍any of the personal attacks ‌launched by the Trump ⁢campaign ​will have an ⁤impact. However, one ​thing is clear – the state of ⁤political⁢ discourse in​ the United States would greatly benefit from a shift towards more‍ civil ‍and substantive discussions that prioritize the⁢ well-being of the country⁢ over personal vendettas and⁢ petty⁤ insults.