Trump cites First Amendment protection in lawsuit seeking his removal from Colorado ballot.
Attorneys for Trump Seek Dismissal of Ballot Suit, Citing First Amendment Protection
Former President Donald Trump’s legal team has taken action to dismiss a lawsuit in Colorado that aims to prevent him from appearing on future ballots. They argue that Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, is protected under the First Amendment, making the suit invalid.
Protecting Free Speech Rights
“At no time do Petitioners argue that President Trump did anything other than engage in either speaking or refusing to speak for their argument that he engaged in the purported insurrection,” attorney Geoffrey Blue stated in the filing.
“The Fourteenth Amendment applies to one who ‘engaged in insurrection or rebellion,’ not one who only ‘instigated’ any action.”
The legal team further contends that Trump did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment because he did not directly participate in the riot. This amendment prohibits individuals who swore to protect the Constitution but then engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding public office.
Additionally, the attorneys assert that the case should be dismissed since Trump is not yet an official candidate under Colorado election law.
This Colorado case is the first of several across different states seeking to prevent Trump’s inclusion on the 2024 ballot through the Fourteenth Amendment. Similar efforts are underway in California, Florida, Georgia, and Minnesota. Trump also faces criminal charges related to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and his involvement in the January 6 riot.
The dismissal motion was filed under Colorado’s anti-SLAPP law, which safeguards individuals from lawsuits that target their protected First Amendment behavior. Although the motion was submitted on Friday, it was not posted by the court until Monday.
A court date has been scheduled for October 13, 2023, to hear the motion, while the constitutional arguments will be presented on October 30, 2023.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
What arguments do Trump’s attorneys present in their motion to dismiss, regarding his constitutional rights and the standing of the plaintiffs?
Filing election challenges based on alleged voter fraud. Attorneys for Trump argue that the lawsuit violates his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and political expression. The case, which was filed by two Colorado voters, seeks to bar Trump and his legal team from making unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud in future elections.
In their motion to dismiss, Trump’s attorneys argue that the lawsuit directly infringes upon his constitutional rights. They contend that as a private citizen, Trump has the right to voice his opinions and concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, even if those claims are unproven or controversial. They argue that stifling his ability to express his views would have a chilling effect on political speech.
The attorneys also challenge the standing of the plaintiffs, questioning whether they have suffered any actual harm or injury from Trump’s alleged false claims. They argue that the plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate a concrete injury or any direct connection to the former president’s speech. Furthermore, they argue that the lawsuit is premature since Trump has not yet launched any election challenges in Colorado.
Additionally, Trump’s legal team raises concerns over the potential impact of this lawsuit on future cases involving election challenges. They argue that if successful, this lawsuit could set a dangerous precedent for limiting political speech and may discourage individuals from coming forward with allegations of voter fraud. They suggest that the court should be cautious in weighing the potential for harm against the importance of protecting freedom of speech, particularly in the context of political discourse.
On the other side, the plaintiffs argue that Trump’s claims of voter fraud have undermined public trust in the electoral system. They contend that his baseless assertions have widespread implications and have the potential to delegitimize the democratic process. They maintain that this lawsuit aims to prevent further dissemination of false information that could erode public confidence in elections.
The lawsuit against Trump highlights the complex tension between protecting individuals’ freedom of speech and maintaining the integrity of democratic processes. While the First Amendment protects the right to express opinions and ideas, it does not provide absolute immunity from legal consequences. Courts must carefully balance these competing interests to ensure a fair and lawful society.
It remains to be seen how the court will rule on this matter. The outcome will likely have significant implications for free speech rights, not just for Trump but for all individuals who engage in political discourse. Ultimately, it is essential to find the delicate balance between safeguarding freedom of speech and upholding the democratic principles that underpin our society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...