The epoch times

Trump co-defendant demands Fulton County DA to disclose any offers made to witnesses or defendants.

Attorneys​ for ⁣Harrison Floyd, a co-defendant in a Fulton County, Georgia,‍ case ‍against former President Donald Trump and 18 others over their contesting the 2020 election results, filed several motions on Monday.

They asked the court to sever his case from most but ⁣not all of the co-defendants, unseal all 2020 ‍election materials, and disclose any deals the state ⁣offered any co-defendant or co-conspirator‌ named in⁣ the⁣ indictment, witnesses, or any​ officer ‍of agent of federal​ of⁢ state governments, whether the deals or “bargains” were ultimately entered into or not.

Mr. Floyd⁤ believes that the ⁤prosecution has already reached⁣ plea ‍bargains ‌with several co-defendants in ⁤the case, according to the filing.

Disclosure⁣ of ‍Deals

The⁤ “reveal the deal” motion (pdf) specifically requests⁤ the prosecution to include any summaries regarding the ⁤deals, dates on which the ⁣negotiations took place, polygraph examinations given to the witnesses, whether any of the witnesses‍ reasonably anticipate being offered something in return in any ⁢other court, whether incarcerated witnesses were given⁣ special ⁢privileges ⁤in return for‍ their testimony, whether witnesses were ‍given any sort of immunity for any offense, and any agreements with ‌any law enforcement agencies to not⁣ take out warrants against such potential ‍witnesses. It also requests that the state reveal any deals‍ witnesses had ​previously reached with any other​ agency in any other case.

“These matters ‌are particularly ⁤relevant to the witness’s bias as it⁢ reflects his willingness, desire, and⁣ experience in cooperating with the‌ Government,” the ​motion reads.

The ⁣attorneys argue that the guarantee of due process under the U.S. Constitution requires the⁣ state ⁤to reveal any agreements, formal‌ or informal, with witnesses in a⁣ criminal prosecution.

“Indeed, the Government‌ may not suppress favorable‌ evidence that ‍is material to the credibility of‍ one of its⁢ witnesses,” they wrote.

The prosecution, led by Fulton ‌County District ⁣Attorney Fani Willis, has estimated it will bring forth 150 witnesses in the ‌trial against‌ the 19⁤ defendants. The 19 were indicted one month ago, with Ms. Willis arguing that their actions to ​challenge ‌the 2020 election result in⁤ Georgia constituted a ‍”racketeering criminal‍ enterprise.” ‍All were ‍charged with violating‍ the state’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act,‍ and 40 other ‍counts.

Severing Case

In‌ addition to violating the RICO statute, Mr. Floyd was charged with two other ⁤counts:‌ conspiracy‌ to ‌commit solicitation of false statements and writings, and‌ influencing witnesses. He ‍is named in 10 of the 161 acts of racketeering listed in the indictment.

The acts center around Mr. Floyd’s contact with co-defendant Stephen Lee, a⁢ pastor from Illinois, and Trevian Kutti, a publicist. They had contacted⁤ Ruby ‍Freeman, an election worker and potential witness in an election fraud investigation, and the indictment cites ⁢those phone calls and texts as “overt acts in furtherance ‌of the conspiracy.”

Attorneys​ for ⁢Mr. ​Floyd are seeking to sever his ⁢case from 16 of the defendants, excluding Mr. ‍Lee and Ms.⁤ Kutti (pdf).

“Other‌ than the fact ‍that he is ⁢a Republican and supporter of ‌President Trump,⁣ the ⁣remaining 38 counts do not​ involve Mr.​ Floyd at all, do ‍not connect him to ‍a common scheme or plan, and do not connect him or his co-defendants (Ms. Trevian Kutti and Rev. Stephen Lee) to the other 16 co-defendants and their facts,” they wrote.

The others were indicted for actions including putting‍ together an alternate ⁢slate of electors and ⁣questioning the integrity of the ballot machines​ used in the⁤ election, which “are simply not relevant in the prosecution or defense of Mr.‌ Floyd⁢ and his immediate co-defendants.”

Several defendants have already requested ​their cases be severed from each other, some arguing⁤ that ⁢the sprawling nature of the indictment hardly applies to them.

The‍ prosecution has argued to keep the cases tethered, as it is ‍a RICO case, which would require prosecutors to try the entire⁤ case each time against all defendants.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker