Trump Gets Major Pre-Debate Boost from New York Times Poll That Shows the Race Has Changed

Two gargantuan caveats must accompany every story about polling results.

First, establishment pollsters have a recent history of extreme inaccuracy. And second, their errors have all tended to favor Democratic presidential nominees, which suggests at least the possibility of design.

With that in mind, former President Donald Trump received even better news than expected from a New York Times/Siena College poll released on Sunday, which showed him holding a one-point lead nationwide over Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of their presidential debate in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on Tuesday.

One Times writer called the result “surprising” but also noted that it could signal a shift toward Trump.

In truth, however, that shift began when former independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. allied with Trump last month.

At an Arizona rally on Aug. 23, Kennedy announced his decision to join forces with Trump and help save Americans from a Democrat-dominated establishment dedicated to perpetual war, censorship and attacks on children.

The Times/Siena poll, therefore, comes as a surprise only because of the establishment news outlet’s honesty about its meaning.

In late July, of course, Democratic elites staged a coup to force President Joe Biden from the race. For weeks thereafter, the establishment media conducted Harris’s campaign for her.

It turns out, however, that the fawning press can only carry the weakest candidate in modern history for so long.

“Mr. Trump may have had a rough month following the president’s departure and amid the burst of excitement that Ms. Harris brought Democrats, but the poll suggests his support remains remarkably resilient,” the Times admitted.

Some voters undoubtedly have noticed that Harris refuses to speak except in the most scripted settings. Indeed, the vice president’s reluctance to answer questions even from friendly reporters has reached comic proportions.

Likewise, some voters might have discovered her extreme dishonesty, inauthenticity and propensity for speaking in word salads.

Furthermore, surely those same voters have noticed her policy-related flip-flops and spectacular failure as “border czar.”

Whatever the reason for her decline in the polls, there is no question that the decline began long before the Times/Siena poll registered it, for other establishment pollsters have noticed the same trend.

To understand the magnitude of Trump’s lead, consider that the same pollster’s final set of polls for the 2020 presidential election showed Biden with an 11-point lead in Wisconsin, per RealClearPolling. But the state’s certified results in that controversial election gave Biden a victory of less than one percentage point.

The final Times/Siena 2020 Ohio poll showed Biden ahead by one point. Trump prevailed by 8.1 points.

In Iowa, Times/Siena showed Biden with a three-point lead. Trump also won that state by 8.2 points.

In other words, if an establishment pollster like Times/Siena shows Trump with a one-point nationwide lead over Harris, then the real margin is almost certainly much higher.

Whether establishment outlets report it that way on election night, Nov. 5, remains to be seen.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.