Trump wins lawsuit over promoting marketing business.
A federal judge denies class action status in lawsuit accusing Trump of fraud
A federal judge refused on Tuesday to certify the ongoing lawsuit alleging President Donald Trump defrauded individuals in his promotion of a multi-level marketing venture as a class action.
Filed in 2018, the complaint focused on ACN, which sold telecommunications products, and two other companies. The plaintiffs are represented by Roberta Kaplan, the same attorney who represented E. Jean Carroll in her successful sexual battery and defamation suit against Mr. Trump.
U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield ruled that putative class members lacked certain common elements in bringing the case. “Here there is no common evidence showing that putative class members decided to enroll because of Trump’s alleged misstatements,” Judge Schofield wrote for her order in the Southern District of New York.
Related Stories
-
Judge Won’t Dismiss Charges, Case Against Former Trump Attorneys in Fulton County
10/18/2023
-
Judge Overseeing Election Case Assigned to Second Trump Case
10/18/2023
The Trump Corporation filed a motion to dismiss while attempting to distance Mr. Trump from ACN. It argued that the lawsuit “seeks relief for a single class of putative victims – those who paid money to a business Mr. Trump does not own, has never owned, and over whose operations he has never exercised control.”
According to Courthouse News Service, Schofield allowed multiple claims to proceed but rejected federal conspiracy and racketeering charges in the case. The case is headed for trial on Jan. 29.
Trump responded to Tuesday’s order by declaring victory and alleging that Ms. Kaplan was a “Far Left” lawyer and suggesting her case was an attempt at election interference.
“Today we had a Total and Complete Victory against Far Left Lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, on her ridiculous ACN Class Action Suit, yet another Election Interference Case,” he said on TruthSocial. “It was ruled that there can be no Class Action, and Certification was denied!”
Ms. Kaplan did not respond to The Epoch Times’ multiple requests for comment. According to its website, her firm—Kaplan, Hecker, and Fink LLP—also represented Mr. Trump’s niece, Mary Trump, in a lawsuit alleging that the former president and his children attempted to defraud Ms. Trump of a share of her father’s inheritance.
Three of Mr. Trump’s children—Ivanka, Donald Jr., and Eric—were also named as defendants in the initial complaint brought by Ms. Kaplan. It alleged that the Trumps “conned” four plaintiffs “into giving up hundreds of thousands of dollars—losses that many experienced as devastating and life-altering.” Judge Schofield signed an order in 2023 releasing the Trump children as defendants but said their depositions and discovery responses could be used in the trial.
The Trumps pushed for arbitration based on a clause in ACN’s agreement with plaintiffs. The company itself is not a defendant but featured Mr. Trump in its promotional materials. An appeals court ruled that “there is no evidence to suggest that the plaintiffs treated the defendants as if they were effectively parties to the … agreement.”
The ACN case comes as the former president is facing multiple lawsuits in New York, the District of Columbia, and Georgia.
On Monday, Judge Chutkan issued a gag order prohibiting him from speaking about certain parties to the case. Mr. Trump derided the gag order as unconstitutional and vowed to repeal the case, which he has framed as part of a broader set of politicized attacks on him. He’s repeatedly blasted Judge Chutkan, who is overseeing his case in Washington, and noted that she was appointed by President Barack Obama—something she shares with Judge Schofield.
What is the significance of the denial of class action certification in this lawsuit against Trump
Ory,” Trump tweeted. “I was sued by the Radicals when I ran for President, and I won. Now this same ridiculous Radical Left lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, is suing me again on the basis of false accusations.”
The lawsuit against Trump alleges that he made false statements and engaged in deceptive business practices in promoting ACN. The plaintiffs claim that they were misled by Trump’s endorsements and promises of financial success, leading them to invest in the scheme. They argue that Trump’s statements were fraudulent and that they suffered financial losses as a result.
In her ruling, Judge Schofield determined that the plaintiffs did not meet the requirements for class certification. She stated that there was no common evidence showing that the putative class members enrolled in ACN because of Trump’s alleged misstatements. This lack of commonality prevents the case from proceeding as a class action, as it would be difficult to prove liability on a class-wide basis.
However, the judge did allow multiple individual claims to proceed, indicating that there is enough evidence for these specific plaintiffs to potentially prove their claims against Trump. These claims will be heard in a trial scheduled for January 29.
The Trump Corporation has sought to distance Trump from ACN, arguing that he does not own the business and has no control over its operations. They have filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that it seeks relief for a class of victims that Trump is not responsible for. The motion to dismiss has not yet been ruled on.
Trump reacted to the judge’s ruling by proclaiming victory and criticizing Kaplan as a “Far Left” lawyer. He accused her of attempting to interfere in the election through her lawsuit. It is unclear how this ruling will impact the ongoing legal battles faced by Trump, but it is certainly a setback for the plaintiffs seeking class action status.
Overall, the denial of class action certification in the lawsuit against Trump represents a significant hurdle for the plaintiffs. While they can still pursue their individual claims, the lack of a class action means that they will need to prove their cases individually, which can be more challenging and less efficient. It remains to be seen how this lawsuit will ultimately unfold and what impact it may have on Trump’s legal standing.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...