Washington Examiner

Trump signals he’ll vote against Florida’s six-week abortion ban – Washington Examiner

Former President Donald ‍Trump⁤ has indicated⁢ his intention to vote against Florida’s six-week​ abortion ban in the upcoming referendum this fall. ⁢This ban,⁢ which follows the 2022 Supreme Court decision⁤ to repeal Roe v. Wade, has drawn⁣ criticism from Trump, who​ considers the⁣ six-week limit ⁤too restrictive. During an interview, Trump ​stated, “I want ​more than six⁤ weeks,” revealing his​ stance against the ban.

While Trump has previously taken credit for appointing justices who supported‌ overturning Roe v. Wade, he has also alienated some in the anti-abortion movement due to his opposition to federal restrictions. He has emphasized that decisions regarding abortion should be made⁢ at the state level but has not clarified whether⁢ he would support⁤ or oppose a federal⁣ abortion ban if proposed during a potential second ​term. His campaign has not addressed the conflicting statements made by allies regarding his position⁢ on abortion. Democrats have criticized Trump’s ⁢stance as⁣ disingenuous, suggesting it reflects a lack of ⁣commitment to genuine reproductive rights.


Trump signals he’ll vote against Florida’s six-week abortion ban in November

Former President Donald Trump signaled Thursday that he plans to vote for Florida‘s abortion referendum this fall, which would reverse his home state’s six-week abortion ban that went into effect following the Supreme Court’s 2022 repeal of Roe v. Wade.

Though Trump has taken credit for installing the Supreme Court justices who struck down the ruling, which created a national right to abortion, he has also angered the anti-abortion movement by opposing restrictions on the procedure at the federal level.

The former president previously hinted that he would soon unveil how he planned to vote on the Florida referendum, known as Amendment 4, during a press conference earlier this month, but in a Thursday interview with the Daily Mail, he revealed that he considers a six-week ban too restrictive.

“I want more than six weeks,” he stated. “I think six weeks is a mistake. And I’ll be expressing that soon, but I want more than six weeks.”

Trump has consistently argued this year that abortion rights should be decided at the state level, a point he again stated in his interview, but he did not say outright Thursday whether he would veto or sign a federal abortion ban into law should it come across his desk in a second term.

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) made headlines over the weekend by pledging that Trump would not sign a federal abortion ban into law as president, and the former president himself claimed on social media Friday that a second Trump “administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights.”

The Trump campaign did not respond to inquiries seeking to square his and Vance’s comments.

However, Democrats argue that Trump’s positions on the issue amount to empty promises.

“This seems so blatantly obvious it almost doesn’t bear mentioning, but Donald Trump cannot be trusted — on abortion, or any other issue,” a veteran Democratic strategist with close ties to Vice President Kamala Harris‘s 2024 campaign told the Washington Examiner earlier this week. “He’s just covering his a** because this is clearly a losing issue for him, and, in doing so, he’s pissing off a big chunk of his own base.”

Anti-abortion activists have voiced frustration with Trump’s handling of the political issue, claiming that he is betraying the movement with his pivot to the middle.

“It is not a pro-life position, it’s not an acceptable position, and it does not provide the contrast on this issue to the degree that we have had in the past between him and Kamala Harris,” Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said after Trump came out against using the Comstock Act to ban sending abortion medication through the mail. “What President Trump is doing is suppressing his own support.”



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker