Trump’s defamation trial starts as GOP primary caucuses begin.
A federal judge has scheduled E. Jean Carroll’s remaining defamation trial against former President Donald Trump for a date in January 2024 that coincides roughly with the kickoff of Republican presidential primary caucuses.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan said in a Thursday scheduling order that Carroll’s civil trial against Trump will begin on January 15, 2024, unless the case has been settled by then.
“Unless this case previously has been entirely disposed of, trial of this action shall commence on January 15, 2024, absent contrary order of the Court,” Kaplan wrote.
The case relates to a lawsuit Carroll filed over allegedly defamatory comments Trump made about her in 2019 when she first publicly accused him of sexual assault.
$10 Million in Damages
Carroll’s attorneys recently amended the defamation lawsuit to include comments Trump made during a CNN town hall in early May, seeking higher damages. That request came after Carroll won $5 million on May 9 in her other defamation suit against the former president.
Kaplan on Tuesday approved the request to amend Carroll’s complaint, with the suit now seeking $10 million in compensatory damages and unspecified punitive damages.
Thursday’s scheduling order from Kaplan relates to Carroll’s amended defamation lawsuit, with the date set for the trial falling a week before the commencement of the first Republican presidential caucus of the 2024 election cycle, which will be held in Iowa.
Like in past primary cycles, the Iowa caucus will be the first-in-nation Republican presidential primary caucus, which has often been described as the first major electoral test for contenders for the White House.
Matthew Dallek, a professor of political history at George Washington University, told PBS during the 2020 election cycle that the Iowa Republican caucuses effectively serve as “referendums on who is the most socially conservative candidate” in the Republican field.
The Iowa caucus, scheduled for Jan. 22, 2024, will be followed by the New Hampshire primary on Jan. 30, 2024.
More Damages
Carroll’s attorneys in late May asked to amend her pending defamation lawsuit, filed in November 2019, so she could seek further punitive damages against Trump.
Carroll had won $5 million on May 9 in her second defamation lawsuit—about $3 million for a defamation charge and about $2 million for a civil battery charge. The defamation charge was related to a statement Trump made on Truth Social in October 2022.
In the civil battery charge, jurors determined that Trump, now 76, had sexually abused, but did not rape, Carroll, 79.
Trump appeared at a town hall event on CNN on May 10—just a day after the verdict—where he called Carroll a “whack job” and said her claims against him were fake.
Carroll, in 2019, accused Trump of having raped her in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in 1995 or 1996.
Up until Carroll’s request to amend her complaint, her first lawsuit had been put on hold as an appeals court was deciding whether Trump was immune from being sued for remarks made while he was in office.
Opposition to Carroll’s Motion to Amend
In the motion to amend, lawyers for Carroll accused Trump of having “doubled down” on derogatory remarks about her.
“Trump’s defamatory statements post-verdict show the depth of his malice toward Carroll since it is hard to imagine defamatory conduct that could possibly be more motivated by hatred, ill will, or spite,” the lawyers wrote in the complaint, filed on May 22 (pdf).
“This conduct supports a very substantial punitive damages award in Carroll’s favor both to punish Trump, to deter him from engaging in further defamation, and to deter others from doing the same.”
In response, lawyers for Trump contended in a June 5 memorandum (pdf) that Carroll’s motion was “futile” since his comments made at the CNN town hall were “safeguarded by the fair reporting privilege, which consequently prevents them from being used as a foundation to enhance the punitive damages sought by [Carroll] in this case.”
The lawyers were referring to the absolute privilege under Section 74 of the New York Civil Rights Law. It states: “A civil action cannot be maintained against any person, firm or corporation, for the publication of a fair and true report
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...