Trump’s executive order immigration crackdown faces blue state hurdles – Washington Examiner

The article discusses the challenges President Donald Trump’s immigration-focused ⁢executive orders face in Democratic-leaning states and cities.As Trump‌ prepares to implement stricter immigration policies, many local governments‌ are proactively enacting laws to shield their resources from involvement in federal immigration enforcement. For instance, Colorado has a law preventing local law enforcement‌ from cooperating with federal agents on immigration matters. Denver, in particular, has adopted policies to protect⁤ its immigrant population and has⁣ developed a response plan for anticipated ICE operations.

In California, cities like los Angeles⁣ and San⁣ Francisco ⁣have declared themselves sanctuary‌ cities, prohibiting city employees from assisting ICE except when federal law mandates ​it. The California Attorney General is also part of a lawsuit against the Trump governance’s attempts to modify ‍birthright citizenship, arguing it’s ​unconstitutional.

Similarly, the Chicago city Council is ​taking measures to counter Trump’s immigration initiatives. the article highlights the ⁤tension between federal ⁣immigration enforcement‍ and local jurisdictions⁤ that aim to protect immigrant rights.


Trump’s executive order immigration crackdown faces blue state hurdles

As state and city officials prepare for President Donald Trump’s immigration-focused executive orders to take effect in their jurisdictions, some Democratic-leaning areas have already passed laws and measures to safeguard them from being forced to use their resources at Trump’s request.

On his first day in office, Trump signed dozens of executive orders to prompt an immigration crackdown. He signed an order declaring a national emergency at the U.S. southern border in order to trigger the deployment of military resources to the border for enforcement and to continue building the wall from his previous administration.

In blue cities and states, local lawmakers have enacted various laws that give government agencies in their jurisdictions the right to refuse to work with the federal government in some capacities. 

Here is how some states and cities are planning to keep their resources away from Trump:

Colorado

A 2019 Colorado law restricts state and local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials’ efforts to arrest, detain, or gather migrants’ personal information. Law enforcement bodies in Colorado can refuse to assist federal immigration agents on civil matters or provide information about an individual wanted by federal immigration agents.

Denver will likely be a target city for federal agents to carry out their deportation plans. The Denver Police Department has policies in place that prevent police officers from asking witnesses or victims of a crime about their immigration status.

According to Mayor Mike Johnston, Denver was the single largest recipient of migrants per capita of any city in the country in 2024 after Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) started bussing migrants crossing the southern border into Texas to Democratic-run cities and states.

Johnston previously said the city will not aid or support Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents when and if they come to Denver. 

City officials have, however, developed a four-point plan for how to respond to anticipated ICE sweeps, which includes directives to collaborate with the federal government on the detention of violent criminals, similar to how the city proceeded under former President Joe Biden, according to CNN

California

California’s largest cities, Los Angeles and San Francisco, have branded themselves as sanctuary cities for immigrants. In the weeks after Trump was elected last year, the Los Angeles City Council unanimously voted to adopt a “sanctuary city” ordinance. 

Both cities also have local ordinances that bar city employees from aiding ICE unless required by federal law.

The Los Angeles Unified School District joined, reaffirming its policy that bars school personnel from voluntarily cooperating with immigration enforcement or sharing information about the immigration status of students and families with immigration agencies.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and 17 other attorneys general across the United States are additionally suing the Trump administration for an executive order, which he said ends birthright citizenship. 

Birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment and has previously been interpreted by the Supreme Court to grant citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil regardless of the citizenship status of their parents. 

“The President’s executive order attempting to rescind birthright citizenship is blatantly unconstitutional and quite frankly, un-American,” Bonta said in a statement.

Chicago

The Chicago City Council last week shot down a proposal to allow the Chicago Police Department to cooperate with ICE officials. The proposal would have allowed Chicago police to “work with federal immigration officers or agencies” when someone is arrested or convicted for “drug-related activities,” “gang-related activities,” “prostitution-related activities,” or a “sex crime involving a minor.”

Chicago’s Welcoming City Ordinance prohibits the city’s police department from working and coordinating with federal immigration enforcement. CPD cannot “arrest, detain or continue to detain a person solely on the belief that the person is not present legally in the United States, or that the person has committed a civil immigration violation,” even if ICE requests so. 

Police in Chicago are also largely banned from asking someone about their immigration status. 

The state-level Illinois TRUST Act additionally largely prohibits that same type of coordination with federal agents across the state. CPD said in a statement it was against the proposal because it said it violated Illinois state law.

Chicago Public Schools sent a letter to families reassuring them the district has policies in place to protect students and staff from immigration enforcement. 

Gov. JB Pritzker (D-IL) expressed his support for migrant families in Illinois in a Monday social media post

Pritzker said the situation is “chaos” in the state, telling reporters the Trump administration has not communicated its plans.

“We can’t stop Homeland Security from coming into the state of Illinois. They are allowed to do that,” Pritzker said. “Indeed, we want them to come into our state when they are doing things that are lawful when they are doing things that are consistent with the values of the American public. 

“We are not standing in their way. We are standing up for the people of Illinois and make sure we are not letting them be taken advantage of,” he continued.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker