Science Magazine Embraces Woke Ideology, Challenges Basic Biology
How Many Sexes Are There? It Depends.
Ask the average person how many sexes there are. Answer: Two.
Consult the Bible on how many sexes there are. Answer: “…male and female created he [God] them.” Genesis 1:27
Refer to Scientific American on how many sexes there are. Answer: “It depends.”
The answer to the question of how many sexes exist differs depending on the context | Analysis https://t.co/W68vMnVOA0
— Scientific American (@sciam) October 24, 2023
How the mighty have fallen.
Venerable Scientific American, in print since 1845 and on whose pages have been the likes of Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla, has joined the nonsensical LGBT world regarding one of the most basic of issues — human sexuality.
And social media won’t tolerate such nonsense.
A simple question about how many sexes there are collapses into a burble of word mush in an October Scientific American article by Charles Roseman.
It’s like asking Scientific American what time it is and they tell you how to build a watch.
Sort of, since they would also wander about the timekeeping universe discussing sundials, egg timers, spring-powered mechanisms, and digital devices coupled with an analysis of time zones and how military Zulu Time equals Coordinated Universal Time.
But you still wouldn’t have your answer.
Same thing with Roseman’s Scientific American article entitled “To Understand Sex, We Need to Ask the Right Questions” as it skips about concepts regarding varied species “including bacteria and archaea” and how they reproduce, “sometimes mate with themselves or switch back and forth between sexual and asexual reproduction” and on and on.
But you still wouldn’t have your answer, since Scientific American is attempting to blur current discussions on who can participate in girls’ sports, coupled with hormone levels and more with the contemporary junk science surrounding transgenderism and LGBT issues (although they’re careful not to spell out those afflictions).
Roseman does admit there are disagreements about what constitutes sex, and points out how the American Anthropological Association and the Canadian Anthropology Society both jettisoned a panel discussion from their annual meeting that was about why biological sex remains important to anthropological research.
The topic apparently was too toxic “following concerns in the anthropological community that the panel conveyed antitransgender sentiment and decrepit ways of thinking about human variation.”
Ultimately, sex is too heavy of a topic for Scientific American to deal with.
“We have no warrant to make authoritative declarations on this issue from a scientific standpoint that is uninformed by ethical, moral or social considerations,” Roseman’s article stated.
“We are in good company here because sex encompasses such a range of questions that we doubt any one medical, scientific or humanistic practitioner would be able to come up with a question that encompasses all of the ways in which humans are affected by sex, however it is construed,” concluded Roseman’s article.
Meaning: It depends.
But Scientific American is not getting away easily with this nonsense. Witness response on X:
Scientific American is illegitimate pseudoscience.
— Bellona (@RomanGoddess72) October 28, 2023
There are only two sexes in nature, male and female. Please stop embarrassing yourselves. This ideological fad will end and your reputation will be in tatters.
— la scapigliata (@lascapigliata8) October 24, 2023
In the human “context” … it’s “TWO”.
— PhotobombingCow (@PhotobombingC) October 25, 2023
How much science is present in the magazine Scientific American depends on the context
— If The Shoe Fits (@ThinkComing) October 24, 2023
I’m cringing for you.
— Patsy Brennan (@HonsCupboard) October 25, 2023
So, attempting to apply new concepts of science as evidenced in Scientific American, there is now a science-proved response when one is asked if a new baby is a boy or girl.
It depends.
The post Trust the Science? America’s Oldest, Most Prestigious Science Magazine Goes Full Woke on Basic Biology appeared first on The Western Journal.
rnrn
According to Scientific American, what factors contribute to the differing answers to the question of how many sexes exist?
How Many Sexes Are There? It Depends.
Ask the average person how many sexes there are, and their answer will likely be two. This belief is rooted in traditional notions of gender, which generally categorize individuals as either male or female. Even the Bible supports this binary understanding, stating in Genesis 1:27 that God created “male and female.”
But what does science have to say about the number of sexes? According to Scientific American, the answer is not so straightforward. In a tweet, the publication stated that the answer to the question of how many sexes exist differs depending on the context.
It is indeed surprising to see Scientific American, a venerable publication that has featured renowned scientists like Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla, joining the discussion around human sexuality with a somewhat vague stance. The article in question, titled “To Understand Sex, We Need to Ask the Right Questions,” by Charles Roseman, delves into a range of topics, including the reproductive behavior of various species.
However, the article fails to provide a definitive answer to the question of how many sexes there are. It meanders through concepts such as bacteria and archaea reproduction and the complexities of sex in different organisms. While it acknowledges that there are disagreements about what constitutes sex, it also seems to blur the lines between biological sex, gender identity, and issues related to LGBT rights.
The reluctance of Scientific American to take a clear position on this topic has not gone unnoticed by the public. Social media users have expressed their discontent, labeling the publication’s approach as pseudoscience and ideological fad. Some individuals firmly assert that there are only two sexes in nature – male and female, citing the biology-based understanding of sex.
Critics argue that Scientific American’s unwillingness to provide a definitive answer undermines its credibility as a scientific publication. They believe that discussions surrounding sex and gender should be grounded in scientific evidence rather than influenced by political or social considerations. Moreover, they point out that avoiding this topic altogether perpetuates confusion rather than providing clarity.
In response to the criticism, Roseman’s article states that Scientific American does not have the authority to make authoritative declarations about sex without considering ethical, moral, and social factors. It suggests that the concept of sex is multifaceted and encompasses various aspects that cannot be fully captured by a single definition.
Ultimately, the question of how many sexes there are remains unanswered. Scientific American’s reluctance to take a definitive stance reflects the complexity and evolving nature of the discussion surrounding sex and gender. While traditional beliefs may persist, it is important to recognize that scientific understanding and societal attitudes towards these issues continue to evolve.
In conclusion, the answer to the question of how many sexes there are depends on the context and perspectives involved. Science offers a broader and more nuanced understanding, but ultimately, it is up to individuals and society as a whole to navigate these complex discussions and strive towards greater inclusivity and understanding.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...