“We’re seeing that Turkey is expanding its military presence in Syria. This is obviously not good for Israel and could lead to clashes,” said Noa Lazimi, a researcher at Israel’s Misgav Institute for National Security.

Trump appears to want Turkey to play a bigger role in the region, despite its poor human rights record toward the Kurds and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s long-standing antipathy toward Israel.

Erdogan, an outspoken supporter of Hamas, called for Israel’s destruction during a visit to a mosque at the end of Ramadan on March 31.

“We see what is happening in Palestine. May Allah destroy Zionist Israel in his holy name. We must see what is happening there, and therefore, we must unite, be strong, and be brothers here. May Allah always strengthen our unity,” he said.   

That didn’t stop Trump from praising Turkey’s leader. On April 8, during a briefing with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump fielded a reporter’s question about whether an expanded role by Turkey’s military in Syria could stabilize it.

After crediting Erdogan for ousting Assad “through surrogates,” Trump said he has “a very, very good relationship” with Turkey and its leader, whom he described as “a tough guy and very smart.”

To Netanyahu, Trump said, “Any problem that you have with Turkey, I think I can solve. I mean, as long as you’re reasonable, you have to be reasonable. We have to be reasonable.”

Khaled Hassan, an Egyptian-British national security and foreign policy adviser, said Turkey’s current push to expand its influence in Syria is driven by both “strategic opportunism” and “domestic imperatives.”

On a macro level, Hassan said, “Erdogan’s ambitions are deeply rooted in a neo-Ottoman Empire vision that seeks to reassert Ankara as a dominant power” across the region. Domestically, Erdogan’s “foreign adventurism” serves as a distraction from Turkey’s economic problems and rising public dissatisfaction.

“By framing these interventions as efforts to protect ‘national security,’ particularly against Kurdish groups labeled as terrorists, Erdogan bolsters his credentials ahead of critical elections,” Hassan said.

Limiting Israeli military action in Syria is just one of Turkey’s many goals, Hassan said. Counterbalancing Russian and Iranian dominance in northwest Syria, making Turkey an indispensable powerbroker in Syria’s reconstruction, and undermining Kurdish aspirations for self-rule, “which Ankara views as an existential threat,” are among its top priorities. 

Sinan Ciddi, a nonresident senior fellow and expert on Turkey at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington, D.C., said Syria’s new president, Ahmed al Sharaa, welcomes a greater diplomatic and military role for Turkey in his country.    

He said, “Ankara has gone to bat for the regime, asking that the international sanctions against Syria,” imposed by the international community during Assad’s reign of terror, “be lifted.”

At a time when Syria’s new regime “lacks the manpower to stabilize Syria,” Turkey is eager to assist with security, build military alliances, and offer military training, Ciddi added.

Eva J. Koulouriotis, a Greece-based political analyst specializing in the Middle East, said a stronger Syria-Turkey alliance would be a win-win for both countries.

“For the new Syrian government, the Turkish military position on Syrian territory could shield Syrian land against any Israeli expansionist plans and would also bolster Damascus’s negotiating position in any future rounds of negotiations between Israel and Syria,” Koulouriotis said.

Lazimi said Israel’s efforts to protect its border with Syria are motivated by legitimate security needs, not expansionism.  

“It is a vital key interest for Israel to ensure that southern Syria remains demilitarized, so the Golan and Galilee aren’t endangered. And by having operational freedom over Syrian airspace, Israel can prevent weapons from falling into the wrong hands and thwart attempts by pro-Turkish militia groups from attacking Israel’s border,” Lazimi said.

“I am not saying that right now the Turks are transferring weapons or arming militants to harm Israel, but the scenario isn’t far-fetched,” she added.

At a time when Trump has promised to play mediator, Lazimi said, Israel “must set red lines” based on its vital security concerns.

“Israel wants to preserve its military edge over other countries in the region,” starting with preventing the sale of F-35s to Turkey, she said.

Despite the growing tensions between Turkey and Israel, military representatives from both countries recently met in Azerbaijan to create a channel to prevent unintended clashes in Syria.

SYRIAN GOVERNMENT SIGNS BREAKTHROUGH AGREEMENT TO REINTEGRATE US-ALIGNED KURDISH FORCES

“The deconfliction mechanism between Turkey and Israel is not a step toward normalization,” a Turkish ministry spokesperson said, according to the Turkish Minute media outlet. “It is a structure designed to ensure the safe and controlled execution of military activities in Syria and to avoid any direct confrontation between the two countries.”

Ultimately, Hassan said, neither country wants to fight the other. For this reason, he said, “a direct confrontation between Israel and Turkey remains highly improbable.”

Michele Chabin is a journalist whose work has appeared in Cosmopolitan, the Forward, Religion News Service, Science, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, and the Washington Post.