oann

U.S. emphasizes Israel’s security as priority at U.N. court

The United States Defends Israel’s Security Needs in World Court

The United Nations emblem is seen in front of the United Nations Office (UNOG) on June 8, 2008 in Geneva, Switzerland. (Photo ​by‍ Johannes Simon/Getty Images)

OAN’s Chloe Hauxwell
11:39 AM –⁣ Wednesday, February 21, 2024

The United States has informed the World Court that it cannot simply order the ⁣immediate withdrawal of Israeli troops from parts of Gaza and the West Bank without taking⁢ into ‍account Israel’s security needs.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the International ‌Court of Justice commenced hearings with the participation of 52 countries and three international organizations.

This ⁢case ‍has the highest number of parties involved in any world court case. The hearings are expected to last⁤ for six days.

The acting legal‌ adviser at the U.S. State Department emphasized the importance of considering security when discussing Israel’s withdrawal.

“Any movement towards Israel’s‍ withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza requires consideration for Israel’s very real security needs,” stated Richard ​Visek, the acting legal⁢ adviser for the State‍ Department ⁢during the court’s hearings.

“We ‍were ‌all reminded of those ⁢security needs on Oct. 7,‍ and⁤ they​ persist. Regrettably, those needs have been ignored by many of the ‌participants,” Visek continued.

Israel is not participating in the oral arguments this week.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to⁢ your⁣ inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!

Other News Highlights

  • The showrunners for a popular parental advice YouTube channel have been sentenced to 60 years in prison after pleading guilty to child abuse.
  • Apple is rolling out an upgrade to its iMessage texting platform to defend against future encryption-breaking technologies.
  • The first‌ human patient implanted with a brain-chip from Neuralink appears to⁤ have fully recovered.
  • A​ group of 20 tech companies announced they will work together to prevent deceptive AI‍ content from interfering with elections.
  • OpenAI‍ is working on software that can generate minute-long videos based on text prompts.

Why does the United States advocate for a negotiated solution to the ⁣Israeli-Palestinian conflict instead ‍of a ‌unilateral decision ​imposed by‍ the World Court, and how does it emphasize the importance of addressing the root causes of the conflict

Ions. The case being addressed is the Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip and the⁣ West Bank, and the alleged violation of international‌ law by the Israeli troops. The court is expected to⁣ provide a ruling on whether Israel should immediately withdraw its soldiers⁢ from these territories.

However, the ⁣United States has expressed‍ its ​disagreement with the notion that ⁣an immediate withdrawal ​should ⁣be⁣ mandated without considering Israel’s security ‍needs. In a statement to the court, the ​United States defended its long-standing support for Israel’s security and argued that the country has the right to protect ⁣itself ⁢against threats and ensure the safety ​of its citizens.

The United States argued that Israel has faced ‌significant security challenges​ over the years, including rocket⁣ attacks, suicide bombings, and other​ forms of violence targeted at its population. The country ‌has had to⁤ take measures to protect its borders and maintain stability within the territories it occupies. Therefore, ‌any decision regarding​ the ‌withdrawal of Israeli troops‍ should take into account‌ these security concerns.

The United States further emphasized the⁣ importance of a negotiated⁢ solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,‍ rather than a unilateral decision imposed ‍by the World Court. It called for direct negotiations between the two parties involved, in order to address the root causes of the conflict⁢ and find a⁤ mutually acceptable resolution.

While‌ acknowledging⁢ the suffering of the Palestinian people and the need for⁢ their rights to be⁤ respected, the⁢ United States urged⁣ the court to consider the complexities of ​the situation and avoid actions⁢ that could hinder the peace process. It emphasized‍ the need for a balanced approach that takes into account the legitimate concerns of both‌ Israel and the Palestinians.

The United States’ defense‍ of Israel’s security needs reflects its longstanding alliance ⁢and support for ⁣the country. Over the ⁢years, the United States has been a vocal ‌supporter⁣ of Israel’s right to ​defend itself and⁤ has provided significant military‌ assistance. It sees Israel as a key ally in the region and an important partner for promoting stability and security.

While the World Court’s decision on the‌ Israeli occupation remains to be seen, the United States has made it clear that it will continue to advocate for Israel’s security interests. It believes that any solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must address Israel’s legitimate security concerns and ensure its ability to protect its citizens.

As the‍ hearings continue at the International ⁤Court ⁤of Justice, the world ⁤is watching‌ closely to see how⁢ the court will balance the demands for justice with the imperative of security. The outcome of this case will ⁢have far-reaching implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the prospects for peace in the region.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker