Under the Biden Administration, Border Patrol officers face pressure to permit border crossings without proper vetting
A recent Department of Homeland Security report highlights that under the Biden administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) supervisors pressured officers at multiple land ports of entry from Mexico to allow vehicles to cross into the United States without proper inspection. The report, authored by Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari and published on June 7, criticizes these practices, noting that officers were pushed to only question drivers and not passengers. Additionally, officers were instructed against using “Simplified Arrival,” a biometric tool designed to help identify individuals with criminal warrants, national security concerns, or significant border crossing histories. This lack of thorough vetting raises concerns about the potential entry of dangerous persons into the U.S., thus posing threats to public safety and national security. The report also assessed the effectiveness of DHS procedures regarding the screening and vetting of asylum seekers and other noncitizens seeking entry into the U.S., especially in light of past difficulties such as those encountered with Afghan refugees. Significant findings from the report also pointed out inconsistencies and lapses in supervisory practices at these border entry points.
A recent report published by the Department of Homeland Security said that under the Biden administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection management pressured officers to allow vehicles to cross from Mexico without proper inspection.
The June 7 report, authored by Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari, said that supervisors at multiple land ports of entry pushed Border Patrol officers to only question the drivers of vehicles entering the United States and not passengers. Officers were instructed not to use “Simplified Arrival,” a biometric tool used by the DHS to “identify criminal warrants, national security concerns, or border crossing history, before admitting [individuals] into the country.” The report further noted that “DHS will remain at risk of admitting dangerous persons into the country who may pose threats to public safety and national security.”
The report sought to determine the effectiveness of DHS procedures to screen and vet asylum seekers and noncitizens seeking admission into the United States following the challenges encountered while screening and vetting refugees, specifically those from Afghanistan.
Other significant findings in the report included twenty-nine supervisors “consistently” instructing subordinate officers to question only persons driving vehicles, not passengers, in crossing vehicles. Over 150 officers admitted to querying only drivers, with 104 doing so “monthly or more often.” Additionally, two officers stated that “to speed traffic flow, travelers either without identification or with expired documents were admitted into the country.”
With the rise of border crossings all along the southern border, agents have often said they’re overwhelmed. Policy for the CBP states that “its land POE processing policy permits exceptions when local port management does not consider complete inspections to be operationally feasible.” In essence, the agency considers factors such as staffing, cross-border events, and traffic volume as reasons not to enforce strict identification review. Port management directed “primary inspection lanes to query only drivers to expedite processing.”
The same report said this practice “leaves officers unaware of potentially derogatory information about persons in a vehicle.” Officers were pressured to release vehicles against their judgment even if they believed all persons should be queried before allowing them to enter the United States.
Nearly 900,000 people enter the nation through POEs every day. The report said that without “querying all noncitizens entering the country … CBP is at risk of allowing criminals, suspected terrorists, or other nefarious actors to enter the United States.”
Arianna Villarreal is a summer intern at The Federalist.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
