The Western Journal

Viral ‘Chase Bank Glitch’ That Was Supposed to Provide Free Money Causes Nightmare for Those Who Participated

Recently,​ a viral “glitch” involving Chase ⁤Bank emerged, with individuals attempting to exploit​ a ​loophole ‍to ⁢withdraw cash from‌ fraudulent checks deposited into their ‍accounts. This scheme, which⁤ originated on TikTok, involved depositing fake checks for large sums⁣ and then quickly withdrawing cash before the checks cleared. The rapid spread ⁤of this information led to many videos showcasing people trying to cash in on what they⁤ mistakenly believed to be “free money.”

However, this is⁤ not a game-like‌ scenario; it is a serious act of fraud. Chase Bank quickly addressed ⁤the issue, emphasizing that such actions are illegal and will have repercussions. As a result, some participants found themselves in ⁢significant debt‌ as the bank placed holds on accounts and investigated‌ the fraudulent activities. Many‍ on social media⁢ expressed skepticism about the claims of individuals accumulating large ⁤negative balances, questioning the ⁣feasibility of withdrawing huge amounts from⁢ ATMs.

the incident serves as a cautionary tale,‍ highlighting the​ risks of participating in viral ‍social⁤ media trends, particularly those involving ‍illegal activities.


It should go without saying that real life is not a video game.

Real life is especially not “Grand Theft Auto: Online” where one can accrue untold gobs of cash with minimal (and typically illegal) effort.

Someone needed to explain that rather obvious fact of life to the people who tried to take advantage of a viral Chase bank “glitch” recently.

The “glitch,” which is really just a rehash of the age old scheme of passing fraudulent checks, effectively goes like this, according to the New York Post:

  • Mobile deposit a fake check for a large sum of money into your Chase account
  • Pull cash out at a physical ATM after the money posts but before the check clears
  • Enjoy?

The “glitch” part of this viral sensation — which reportedly originated on TikTok — appears to be rooted in that second bullet point.

Normally, banks have safeholds in place to avoid this exact and similar situations (i.e. if a check were to bounce after depositing it), but this glitch appears to have overrode that safehold for Chase, at least for a moment.

The glitch largely appears to have gone viral at the end of August, going right into Labor Day weekend.

Accompanying videos of people exploiting this glitch swiftly went viral, as well, for obvious reasons. After all, who wouldn’t want some “free” cash?

Just one problem: This isn’t Grand Theft Auto, and when you effectively rob from a bank, they will actually come after you.

Unsurprisingly, Chase was less than thrilled with the viral “glitch,” as noted by People magazine.

In a statement provided to People, the Post and other outlets, a Chase representative said, “We are aware of this incident, and it has been addressed.”

The rep added, “Regardless of what you see online, depositing a fraudulent check and withdrawing the funds from your account is fraud, plain and simple.”

Further adding to this nightmarish scenario, some social media users who claimed to have engaged in the stunt showed images of their Chase bank account tens of thousands of dollars in the red.

(People magazine did note that the Chase rep did not comment on the extent of the apparent fraud.)

Anyone who did partake in this stunt and ended up with a large negative balance won’t find much sympathy online.

It is worth noting that some on social media were dubious of the people claiming to be tens of thousands of dollars in debt.

“I’m supposed to believe that person was able to withdraw $31,000 in cash from an atm?” asked one social media skeptic.

One possible explanation: The fraudulent check deposited may have been in the sum of $31,000, but the scam participant may have only been able to draw $1,000 or whatever is their daily limit.






" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker