Susanna Gibson: From Livestreaming Sex to Struggling for Support
Susanna Gibson, Democratic candidate for Virginia House
Prominent Virginia Democrats are turning their backs on House of Delegates candidate Susanna Gibson, who recently made headlines for engaging in explicit acts and live-streaming them for money.
After video clips and screenshots of Gibson’s performances on the X-rated website Chaturbate circulated through the media, Gibson claimed that the distribution of these clips, which have been available on third-party pornography websites for over a year, constituted a “sex crime.”
However, Democrats are not rushing to Gibson’s defense. Virginia’s Democratic senators, Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, declined to comment on whether she should end her campaign. Gibson’s district, which includes part of Richmond and its surrounding suburbs, is one of the few that could determine which party controls the state’s lower chambers after the upcoming elections in November.
“I met Ms. Gibson once,” Warner told the Washington Times. ”I’m anxious to hear—there have been reports from her campaign of pushback. I want to hear both sides and then I’ll weigh in.”
Kaine, who campaigned for Gibson just last weekend, said at a Wednesday press conference, “I don’t really know her that well.”
“But I was very, very surprised at the story. It really took me aback,” he added.
Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger, who previously supported Gibson’s campaign, called the videos ”a shocking, terrible situation.” Spanberger also declined to comment on whether Gibson should drop out of the race.
Gibson’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.
Gibson, often accompanied by her husband, performed on Chaturbate from at least May 2022 to September of that year, two months after she announced her candidacy. In exchange for “tips” from Chaturbate users, Gibson would act out various sexual requests.
“Yeah, you can watch me pee. Let me block a few people and then y’all can watch me pee if you tip me and some tokens again I’m raising money for a good cause,” she said in one Chaturbate session, uploaded to a third-party website on Sept. 5, 2022. Gibson received the “Family Friendly Seal of Approval” from the left-wing Family Friendly Virginia in May.
Gibson remains determined to stay in the race and told the New York Times that the circulation of her Chaturbate streams “won’t intimidate me and it won’t silence me.” Her attorney, Daniel P. Watkins of the Meier Watkins Phillips Pusch firm, stated that any dissemination of her pornographic performances is “illegal.” Watkins is currently “working closely with the F.B.I and local prosecutors to bring the wrongdoers to justice.”
How can L navigate the lack of support from prominent Virginia Democrats in light of Gibson’s scandal?
L make a decision on what further actions, if any, are appropriate.”
Kaine also expressed his reluctance to take a stance on the matter. “I think it’s important for people to be able to run for office and discuss their ideas and concerns,” he said. “But I also think it’s important for candidates to address any legitimate concerns that may arise.”
While some Democratic officials remain tight-lipped, others are openly criticizing Gibson. Delegate Charniele Herring, who serves as the chair of the Virginia Democratic Party, condemned Gibson’s actions, calling them “unacceptable” and “inconsistent with the values of our party.”
Gibson’s explicit livestreams have put her campaign in jeopardy, as many constituents and party members believe her behavior undermines her credibility as a candidate. Despite her attempts to portray herself as a victim, it is clear that considerable damage has been done, and her chances of winning the election are dwindling.
Moreover, Gibson’s actions have raised concerns about her judgment and integrity. Engaging in explicit online behavior for financial gain not only raises ethical questions but also brings into question her ability to make sound decisions and prioritize the interests of her constituents. Voters are left wondering if someone who is willing to engage in such activities can be trusted to represent them effectively in the Virginia House.
At a time when public trust in elected officials is already low, Gibson’s scandal serves as another blow to the reputation of politicians. It reinforces the perception that politicians are willing to prioritize personal gain over the needs of the people they serve.
The lack of support from prominent Virginia Democrats further highlights the seriousness of the situation for Gibson. Without the backing of her party, she faces an uphill battle in convincing voters that she is fit for public office.
While it is important to approach this situation with fairness and open-mindedness, it is evident that the controversy surrounding Gibson’s explicit livestreams has cast a shadow over her campaign. Whether or not she can overcome the negative perception and regain the trust of voters remains to be seen.
As the November elections draw near, voters in Gibson’s district will have to carefully consider whether her past actions are indicative of her character and abilities as a public servant. The outcome of this election will not only determine the future of Gibson’s political career but also send a message about the standards voters hold for their elected representatives.
Now loading...