Vivek Ramaswamy addresses criticism on 9/11 ‘Inside Job’ stance.
GOP Presidential Hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy Sparks Controversy with 9/11 Comments
Last week, Republican candidate Vivek Ramaswamy faced intense criticism for questioning the official narrative surrounding the 9/11 attacks. In an interview with BlazeTV, Ramaswamy expressed skepticism towards the government’s account of the events, stating that he believes we should be cautious of what we are told. His comments ignited a firestorm of backlash from fellow Republicans and media outlets.
.@alexstein99: “Was 9/11 an inside job or exactly how the government tells us?”@VivekGRamaswamy: “I don’t believe the government has told us the truth. We have to be skeptical. Do I believe everything the government told us about it? Absolutely not.” pic.twitter.com/nLhUtuvCZ5
— BlazeTV (@BlazeTV) August 2, 2023
Fellow Republican candidate Mike Pence and others expressed their offense at Ramaswamy’s remarks. The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board published an opinion piece criticizing Ramaswamy, suggesting that he is too inexperienced and accusing him of relying on unreliable sources.
Ramaswamy responded to the criticism with a letter published in the Journal and a statement on social media. In his letter, he clarified that he was not endorsing conspiracy theories but rather questioning the government’s handling of the 9/11 investigation. He highlighted recently declassified documents that suggest possible Saudi involvement in the attacks and emphasized the importance of transparency and public trust.
The controversy surrounding Ramaswamy’s comments has sparked a debate about government accountability and the role of the media in shaping public perception. While there is no credible evidence to support the claim that 9/11 was an inside job, Ramaswamy’s remarks underscore the need for transparency and honesty from our leaders.
Do you agree with Ramaswamy on 9/11?
“Last week, a comedian podcaster asked me if 9/11 was an ‘inside job or exactly as the government tells us?’ I answered truthfully: I do not believe everything the government has told us about that day.
“I wasn’t referring to the baseless theories about controlled demolitions at buildings around the World Trade Center, but the very real possibility supported by recently declassified documents that al-Qaida’s attack was undertaken with support from Saudi intelligence officials.
“Apparently, that breached a third rail of American politics.
“Democrat Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut tweeted: ‘If you want to be the GOP presidential nominee, you need to believe the government blew up the Twin Towers, and Osama bin Laden is an innocent man who’s living under an alias in Miami.’ Former Vice President Pence said he was ‘deeply offended’ that I don’t trust that the government told us the full truth in the 9/11 Commission Report.
“The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board pages mocked me for wading into ‘fever swamps’ and were appalled that a presidential candidate ‘really just said that,’ quipping that ‘back on planet Earth, the 9/11 Commission was one of the better efforts at government accountability in recent memory and its findings have never been discredited by anyone credible.’
“Hold on there. Back on the real planet Earth, the FBI declassified documents in 2021 which reveal that the 9/11 Commission flatly lied about potential Saudi government involvement in the attacks.
“Yes, it’s in our national interest to move on from 9/11 and to preserve a stable relationship with Saudi Arabia — but our best chance of rebuilding public trust is to acknowledge the truth about one of the defining events in our nation’s history.
“A key question confronted by the 9/11 Commission was whether the Saudi government was involved in planning the attacks. The report concluded there was neither Saudi government nor royal family involvement.
“At the time, questions swirled around a 42-year-old graduate student who welcomed, housed, [set up] bank accounts, and gave rent money to the first two Qaida hijackers after they landed in Los Angeles in January 2000 — concerns which the FBI and 9/11 Commission flatly dismissed.
“The Saudi student, Omar al-Bayoumi, claimed to have met the two terrorists entirely by chance; The 9/11 Commission report verified that Bayoumi’s altruism was in the name of hospitality as he claimed. And FBI official, Jacqueline Maguire, testified to the 9/11 Commission in 2004 that Bayoumi’s first meeting at a café with the hijackers appeared to be ‘a random encounter.’
“This is all against the backdrop of a 1998 FBI investigation revealing that rather than attend graduate school as he purported, Bayoumi frequented local mosques, doling out money for various causes and frequently and conspicuously videotaped visitors.
“The ‘graduate student’ reportedly put up $400,000 to start a mosque in San Diego and all the while was paid a stipend and other expenses as a ghost employee of a Saudi contracting company, the FBI reported.
“Notwithstanding these facts, both the FBI and the 9/11 Commission emphatically supported Bayoumi’s account.
“Now over 20 years later, the FBI has changed its story.
“In documents declassified last year, the bureau affirmed that Bayoumi was in fact an agent of the Saudi intelligence service who worked with Saudi religious officials and reported to the kingdom’s powerful ambassador in Washington.
“These revelations are now the focal point in a long-running federal lawsuit in New York, where 9/11 survivors and relatives of the 2,977 people who were killed are seeking to hold the Saudi government responsible for the attacks. Even if the media doesn’t want to litigate the case against the Saudi government, these survivors and family members are — and understandably so.
“There are reasons to believe that successive U.S. administrations hid the Bayoumi revelations to provide public cover to the CIA for critical failures in the lead-up to 9/11.
“The two Saudis, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, were known to the CIA as al-Qaida operatives. The CIA was watching as they joined an al-Qaida planning meeting in Malaysia in early January 2000. But the agency reportedly lost track of the two when they flew on to Bangkok and then to Los Angeles on Jan. 15, 2000.
“Embarrassingly, the CIA did not alert the FBI for more than a year after it learned the terrorists had entered the United States using their real names and Saudi passports.
“Given the enduring mystery over how the CIA lost track of Hazmi and Mihdhar in Malaysia, former FBI investigators have speculated that Bayoumi might have been asked to approach the hijackers as part of a U.S. or Saudi intelligence operation to recruit them. At the time, former officials have said, the CIA was trying desperately to develop sources inside al-Qaida.
“The CIA has consistently denied that it allowed the hijackers to come into the United States as part of a failed recruitment effort. Former White House counterterrorism coordinator, Richard Clarke, cited this as a plausible explanation for the CIA’s failure to track the first two hijackers and its abiding refusal to alert the FBI to their presence in the United States.
“The government hasn’t done itself any favors since then to build public trust around 9/11 or the U.S. response to it. The Pentagon’s prevarications about celebrity soldier Pat Tillman’s death in Afghanistan — initially claiming he was shot by enemy forces, but later forced to admit that he was killed by friendly fire — is one undisputed case among many.
“These events are important foremost because U.S. government officials continue to lie about other matters of public importance — the origin of Covid-19, knowledge about UAPs, Hunter Biden’s laptop, and so on — with a complicit media that just accepts the prevailing narrative without question. This fuels rampant public distrust.
“There is no credible evidence that 9/11 was an ‘inside job,’ but ironically when the government systematically lies about Saudi involvement and the media runs interference, that lends plausibility to an otherwise nonsensical claim.
“There’s no such thing as a noble lie. The reason the people don’t trust the government is because the government doesn’t trust the people.
“And yes, a Republican candidate for President really just said that.”
The post Vivek Ramaswamy Responds to Backlash Over His Answer on if 9/11 Was an ‘Inside Job’ appeared first on The Western Journal.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...