Washington Post Is Breaking Its Pro-Democrat Tradition by Not Endorsing Kamala
The Washington Post recently announced that it will not endorse a presidential candidate in the upcoming election, which has sparked significant discussion within the media and political circles. The publisher, William Lewis, stated that this decision aims to demonstrate the paper’s independence and encourage readers to form their own opinions regarding the election. Historically, the Post has supported Democratic candidates since 1976, but the current sentiment reflects a shift away from this practice.
The announcement follows a similar non-endorsement by the Los Angeles Times and has led to speculation regarding Vice President Kamala Harris’s candidacy. Some commentators suggest that the lack of endorsement might impact voter turnout for Harris. In prior years, the Post endorsed candidates including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden, but now aims to return to its roots by refraining from endorsements in future elections. The decision has drawn reactions from various political commentators and users on social media, highlighting the implications this may have for the political landscape heading into the election.
The Washington Post became the second major American daily newspaper that routinely gives its stamp of approval to Democrats and liberals to pass on endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris.
A column by Post publisher William Lewis said the decision was part of an effort to show the Post was independent.
“We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility. That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way,” Lewis wrote, noting the Post largely eschewed endorsements prior to 1976.
The Washington Post/LA Times non-endorsement means nothing to average Americans.
It means everything to columnists, establishment figures, and pundits.
Their collective meltdown and subsequent infighting could depress Harris’ voter turnout nationwide. https://t.co/KfDDogTEBp
— Andrew Shirley 🇺🇸 (@AA_Shirley) October 25, 2024
“We also see it as a statement in support of our readers’ ability to make up their own minds on this, the most consequential of American decisions — whom to vote for as the next president,” he wrote.
Lewis wrote that the paper was not planning to re-enter the world of presidential endorsement.
“The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election. Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates,” he wrote.
First the LA Times and now the Washington Post.
Even the most liberal newspapers in America want nothing to do with Kamala Harris. https://t.co/m1pn6prhwl pic.twitter.com/nL1GiOwoLI
— Kristan Hawkins (@KristanHawkins) October 25, 2024
The Post reported that an editorial supporting Harris was drafted by the editorial board, but shot down by owner Jeff Bezos. The Post noted that all presidential endorsements since 1976 have been for Democrats.
The Post’s lack of support for Harris comes after Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, owner of the Los Angeles Times, stifled its editorial board’s proposed endorsement of Harris.
Kamala Harris is so bad, The Washington Post decided to never endorse another presidential candidate again 💀 pic.twitter.com/l0oYJ5xwx7
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 25, 2024
The Post noted it last sat out the 1988 presidential contest between Republican President George H.W. Bush and Democratic Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis.
More recently, the Post endorsed former President Barack Obama in 2008, dissing Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin in the process.
In 2012, the Post stuck with Obama despite “the disappointments of Mr. Obama’s time in office.”
📰 BREAKING: The Washington Post is not endorsing any presidential candidates!
Is Kamala Harris considered that bad that The WaPo is not endorsing a presidential candidate for the first time in decades? pic.twitter.com/omFB5AUM34
— Beats in Brief (@beatsinbrief) October 25, 2024
In 2016, the Post opted for Democrat Hillary Clinton, calling former President Donald Trump “dreadful” and “uniquely unqualified as a presidential candidate.”
In 2020, the Post supported President Joe Biden, suggesting that selecting Harris was one of his achievements due to her qualifications.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
